429:- When the article was redirected, several editors attempted to put the information in the List article. It was repeatedly removed, and stated that the list was for summaries only and that was too much information. IF there is too much information for a summary, then it is clear that an article is needed. Redirection has resulted in citied information being removed from wikipedia, an action contrary to the goals of the project. Last, TTN's assertion that "It was decided by the Pokemon project to remove all besides Pikachu" is absurd. A look at the talk page and other conversations will show there was HUGE opposition to this. Just because a few months passed and THEN it was redirected without discussion or consensus does not mean that people's former opinions have gone away. Even the redirect was reverted and only remains because its creator and TTN edit warred over it, against other's opinions so it is pretty clear that there is/was/never was consensus for that action.
336:
a featured article, but as time passes, standards change. After being removed from FA status, the article couldn't become a good article. It was decided by the
Pokemon project to remove all besides Pikachu because it is the only one with relevant information (feel free to compare and contrast). Also,
449:
on the entire of
Knowledge (XXG), then there is obviously enough relevent information on the topic. Yes, it was delisted, and no, it's not even a Good Article now, but if information was lost or made muddling since it became a Featured Article it can be restored.
351:
I asked you several times before to give me the links to the relevant discussions that, as you said, had reached consensus, but you refused to do so. Now, I ask you again, please provide the links so the AfD participants can judge the case on its merit. Thanks, -
82:, the pressing of a delete button by an administrator. Do not bring articles here if an administrator pressing that button is not what you want. The correct venues for discussing redirects, mergers, and other ordinary editing matters (which do
263:. Since "delete and redirect", "redirect without deletion", "merge" and "keep" are all possibilities, a community discussion on content is needed. Procedural nomination, I have no editorial opinion on the topic. ~
188:
193:
183:
178:
173:
248:
58:
Review that that was the improper venue for discussing this, and that the proper venue was the article's talk page. AFD, too, is not the proper venue for discussing this. What
54:. No-one wants an administrator to press a delete button here. This is an ordinary editing dispute that is addressible with ordinary editing tools. It was pointed out a
337:
please do not say that this has enough information to hold an article. Most of the first two hundred could easily get up to this standard. Should be bring those back too?
370:
168:
298:
By virtue of the fact that this article was promoted to
Featured Status, a great deal of verifiable, notable information exists in this topic.
109:
445:- As several people have pointed out, the article was once a Featured Article. If this article was at one time considered to be one of
69:
17:
101:
91:
483:
459:
437:
421:
399:
382:
361:
346:
324:
307:
290:
272:
148:
121:
221:
216:
225:
498:
36:
208:
407:
a major character in the series. The article is sourced and was formerly featured. What is the supposed problem?
268:
260:
144:
105:
497:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
455:
416:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
303:
63:
472:
468:
50:
87:
59:
320:
264:
140:
476:
451:
410:
281:. Former featured article on the Main Page, no clear reason for deletion/redirection was given.-
434:
357:
299:
286:
117:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
135:
100:
involved. AFD is not a way of gaining a wider audience to a talk-page discussion. That is
256:
130:
316:
212:
378:
342:
133:
so reasoning addressing editorial nominations does not apply. In any case, this is a
430:
395:
353:
282:
113:
242:
204:
157:
374:
338:
129:
Invalid closing statement stricken. This was a procedural nomination per
259:
because a long history of edit warring led to a protected redirect to
471:. I won't repeat myself here, unless I need to; read the archives at
96:
There is enough traffic at AFD discussing articles where deletion is
467:. I have explained why this article should be kept lots of times at
104:. Other venues for raising matters for general discussion are the
491:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
238:
234:
230:
189:Articles for deletion/Bulbasaur Mansion Characters
194:Articles for deletion/Bulbasaur evolutionary line
90:pointed out, the articles' talk pages, employing
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
501:). No further edits should be made to this page.
184:Articles for deletion/Bulbasaur (4th nomination)
179:Articles for deletion/Bulbasaur (3rd nomination)
174:Articles for deletion/Bulbasaur (2nd nomination)
72:) wrote at Deletion review is quite correct.
8:
369:Note: This debate has been added to the
166:
110:Knowledge (XXG):Centralized discussions
86:involve deletion in any way) are, as
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
393:it's a previous TFA, for god's sake
102:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment
92:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment
469:at the Pokémon Wikiproject talkpage
164:
24:
315:due to Featured Article status.
169:Articles for deletion/Bulbasaur
1:
484:16:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
460:16:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
438:16:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
422:16:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
400:16:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
383:15:37, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
371:list of video game deletions
362:15:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
347:15:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
325:14:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
308:14:41, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
291:14:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
273:13:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
149:19:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
122:16:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
106:Knowledge (XXG):Village pump
518:
494:Please do not modify it.
48:. This is Articles for
32:Please do not modify it.
261:List of Pokémon (1-20)
163:AfDs for this article:
78:is for discussing
447:the absolute best
306:
509:
496:
480:
420:
413:
385:
302:
246:
228:
44:The result was
34:
517:
516:
512:
511:
510:
508:
507:
506:
505:
499:deletion review
492:
478:
411:
408:
368:
265:trialsanderrors
257:deletion review
219:
203:
200:
198:
161:
141:trialsanderrors
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
515:
513:
504:
503:
487:
486:
462:
452:MelicansMatkin
440:
424:
412:brighterorange
402:
387:
386:
366:
365:
364:
332:- The article
327:
313:Reluctant Keep
310:
293:
253:
252:
199:
197:
196:
191:
186:
181:
176:
171:
165:
162:
160:
155:
154:
153:
152:
151:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
514:
502:
500:
495:
489:
488:
485:
482:
474:
470:
466:
463:
461:
457:
453:
448:
444:
441:
439:
436:
432:
428:
425:
423:
418:
414:
406:
403:
401:
398:
397:
392:
389:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
367:
363:
359:
355:
350:
349:
348:
344:
340:
335:
331:
328:
326:
322:
318:
314:
311:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
292:
288:
284:
280:
277:
276:
275:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
250:
244:
240:
236:
232:
227:
223:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
201:
195:
192:
190:
187:
185:
182:
180:
177:
175:
172:
170:
167:
159:
156:
150:
146:
142:
138:
137:
136:snowball keep
132:
128:
127:
126:
125:
124:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:if necessary.
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
74:Articles for
71:
68:
65:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
493:
490:
475:. Regards, —
464:
446:
442:
426:
404:
394:
390:
333:
329:
312:
300:RyanGerbil10
295:
278:
254:
134:
97:
88:81.104.39.63
83:
79:
75:
73:
66:
60:81.104.39.63
55:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
465:Strong keep
391:Speedy keep
304:(Говорить!)
46:speedy keep
255:Listed at
481:tianpower
205:Bulbasaur
158:Bulbasaur
98:genuinely
330:Redirect
249:View log
80:deletion
76:deletion
70:contribs
56:Deletion
51:deletion
473:WT:POKE
431:pschemp
354:PeaceNT
283:PeaceNT
222:protect
217:history
114:Uncle G
317:Madman
226:delete
131:WP:DRV
108:, and
296:Keep.
243:views
235:watch
231:links
16:<
456:talk
443:Keep
435:talk
427:Keep
417:talk
405:Keep
396:Will
379:talk
358:talk
343:talk
321:talk
287:talk
279:Keep
269:talk
239:logs
213:talk
209:edit
145:talk
139:. ~
118:talk
64:talk
477:Cel
375:TTN
339:TTN
334:was
247:– (
84:not
479:es
458:)
433:|
409:—
381:)
373:.
360:)
345:)
323:)
289:)
271:)
241:|
237:|
233:|
229:|
224:|
220:|
215:|
211:|
147:)
120:)
112:.
454:(
419:)
415:(
377:(
356:(
341:(
319:(
285:(
267:(
251:)
245:)
207:(
143:(
116:(
67:·
62:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.