240:- The basis is valid and I can't see problems with the implementation that would defeat the article's point. Much has been written about business in Second Life: we definitely need to cover corporate presence. The list has very clear criteria. If entries need to be limited further, which I don't think they do, we should at the least look at the way the matter has been handled in other business or organization lists. --
281:: There are reliable third-party sources on many of these businesses and organizations in Second Life because it's a pretty monumental phenomenon. Also, I don't think anything has really changed (on Knowledge, or in the game industry) that would justify a change in consensus from the previous AFD, which was to
216:
In response to your second point- I'm not seeing how its unmaintainable. It seems like as long as the stuff in there is sourced correctly (and the first part of the article is re-written, holy cow is that badly done), it seems to me at least, that it can be done. As for your first question...
76:
217:
probably because everybody who would want to do it is too busy living their second lives to be worried about first life things like wikipedia ;). As a serious response, all i can really say is just because it *hasn't* been done, doesn't mean it *can't* be done.
71:
293:. There appears to be a consensus to clean this list up so that it isn't an indiscriminate list of every "player" to make an organization in the "game", but a list of truly notable organizations. A lot of this article violates
103:
98:
107:
90:
136:
352:
319:
310:
273:
254:
226:
207:
191:
173:
150:
55:
94:
318:
This is certainly notable -- I remember hearing on NPR when Wells Fargo decided to open up in the game. But it needs lots of cleanup, perhaps a total makeover.
262:
really major internet phenomenon., I'm not sure where it would shade over into directory, but the presenrt article is still ok and the criteria satisfactory.
86:
61:
161:
143:
No real notability, indiscriminate list. Uncategorized to boot. Kept in March with promises to trim and source. Sourced, maybe, trimmed, no.
17:
249:
367:
36:
366:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
289:, there was also a consensus that a lot of the in-game-only organizations were inappropriate and verging on
327:: I went ahead and cleaned this up. You can compare the version that was originally nominated for deletion
222:
187:
348:
306:
201:
144:
49:
169:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
200:
Then why is nobody tending to it? :-P Seriously, it seems like an unmaintainable list to me.
298:
218:
183:
244:
335:. Everything I removed was either unreferenced, or referenced to sources that would fail
344:
302:
294:
290:
340:
269:
165:
124:
77:
Articles for deletion/Businesses and organizations in Second Life (2nd nomination)
336:
182:- I see no problems with the list that can't be solved through editing/cleanup.
241:
264:
72:
Articles for deletion/Businesses and organizations in Second Life
360:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
332:
328:
131:
120:
116:
112:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
370:). No further edits should be made to this page.
162:list of video game related deletion discussions
8:
87:Businesses and organizations in Second Life
62:Businesses and organizations in Second Life
160:: This debate has been included in the
69:
339:(and for information that would fail
7:
316:Keep but definite need for clean-up
68:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
353:19:33, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
320:19:25, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
311:19:18, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
274:18:58, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
255:18:40, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
227:18:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
208:18:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
192:18:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
174:17:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
151:17:46, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
56:20:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
387:
363:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
331:, with the new version
67:AfDs for this article:
206:and his otters •
149:and his otters •
54:and his otters •
44:The result was
279:Keep but clean-up
176:
378:
365:
252:
247:
204:
203:Ten Pound Hammer
156:
147:
146:Ten Pound Hammer
134:
128:
110:
52:
51:Ten Pound Hammer
48:Yeah, whatever.
34:
386:
385:
381:
380:
379:
377:
376:
375:
374:
368:deletion review
361:
250:
245:
202:
145:
130:
101:
85:
82:
65:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
384:
382:
373:
372:
356:
355:
322:
313:
276:
257:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
211:
210:
195:
194:
177:
141:
140:
81:
80:
79:
74:
66:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
383:
371:
369:
364:
358:
357:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
323:
321:
317:
314:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
277:
275:
271:
267:
266:
261:
258:
256:
253:
248:
243:
239:
236:
235:
228:
224:
220:
215:
214:
213:
212:
209:
205:
199:
198:
197:
196:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
154:
153:
152:
148:
138:
133:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
73:
70:
63:
60:
58:
57:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
362:
359:
324:
315:
286:
282:
278:
263:
259:
237:
179:
157:
142:
45:
43:
31:
28:
219:Umbralcorax
184:Umbralcorax
345:Randomran
303:Randomran
299:WP:MADEUP
46:Withdrawn
137:View log
325:Comment
295:WP:SPAM
291:WP:SPAM
287:However
166:MrKIA11
104:protect
99:history
341:WP:NOT
132:delete
108:delete
135:) – (
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
349:talk
337:WP:V
333:here
329:here
307:talk
297:and
283:keep
270:talk
260:Keep
238:Keep
223:talk
188:talk
180:Keep
170:talk
158:Note
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
343:).
265:DGG
242:Kiz
351:)
309:)
301:.
285:.
272:)
225:)
190:)
172:)
164:.
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
347:(
305:(
268:(
251:r
246:o
221:(
186:(
168:(
139:)
129:(
127:)
89:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.