231:) for specifics. Many of the stations are still replaying the interview and most have us schedule to return - Google GOOOH - there are dozens of sites linking to us - We have been in newspapers from Texas to New Hampshire to Washington (state). - Most importantly, we have had 60,000 visitors come to our Web site and WP: Org specifically states, “Notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice." It is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." Please consider notable and demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education... arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations.”
367:
comments above, but simply points out that I have made a limited amt of edits. This is true, but in no way should it diminish the credibility of the points in my Keep vote - they must be evaluated on their own merits - which has not yet been done. I would hate to think that I was being dismissed
234:
We would not be on so many talk radio stations or having tens of thousands of visitors come to our site if we were not notable or attracting notice. Granted, we are just getting started, but with the
November election getting closer, our popularity will only increase.
220:
120:
284:
180:
this article should GOOOH away (like I wasn't the first to think of this?). In all seriousness, article is grossly written from a POV, also the group does not meet
87:
82:
91:
74:
227:"We believe GOOOH, a growing national movement, should remain listed. Here is further justification: - We have been on talk radio in 40+ cities (see
268:, please clarify as this assertion appears groundless based on 1) multiple newspaper articles from mid-sized metropolitan areas (as shown here
319:
287:
275:
17:
153:, although I find the acronym pretty amusing. It's like something an anime character would shout while charging into battle.
250:
377:
335:
298:
254:
210:
193:
172:
136:
56:
356:
281:
78:
395:
36:
394:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
246:
189:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
70:
62:
272:
373:
313:
294:
369:
309:
290:
289:. Regarding the article having a POV: that is possible, but warrants a cleanup - not a deletion. --
269:
185:
206:
53:
242:
216:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
350:
331:
132:
278:
154:
364:
360:
323:
265:
202:
181:
146:
49:
108:
150:
346:
327:
128:
277:), 2) dozens of blog and website references (incl. one as notable as
343:
228:
388:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
221:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/GOOOH Political Action
Committee
283:), and 3) a published book on the process found on Amazon.com
241:(original statement made at 17:01, 22 February 2008, by
115:
104:
100:
96:
363:label, as he provides no material refutation of my
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
398:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
184:and there aren't any other verifications.
201:as above per Andrew & Wildthing.
7:
326:with only six edits on the subject.
264:I see no grounds to delete based on
368:simply because I am a neophyte. --
215:The following content was added by
24:
238:Thanks for your consideration."
229:http://www.GOOOH.com/Media.aspx
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
378:23:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
336:01:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
299:00:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
255:04:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
211:23:48, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
194:16:22, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
173:16:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
137:16:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
57:21:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
342:* subnote to closing admin,
415:
391:Please do not modify it.
71:GOOOH National Committee
63:GOOOH National Committee
32:Please do not modify it.
308:note to closing admin,
286:and BarnesAndNoble.com
245:; pasted in here by
219:at the orphaned AfD
359:) to explain his
334:
135:
406:
393:
330:
170:
167:
164:
161:
131:
118:
112:
94:
34:
414:
413:
409:
408:
407:
405:
404:
403:
402:
396:deletion review
389:
168:
165:
162:
159:
114:
85:
69:
66:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
412:
410:
401:
400:
384:
383:
382:
381:
339:
302:
301:
279:Richard Winger
225:
224:
213:
196:
186:Wildthing61476
175:
155:Andrew Lenahan
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
411:
399:
397:
392:
386:
385:
380:
379:
375:
371:
366:
362:
358:
355:
352:
348:
345:
340:
338:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
315:
311:
306:
305:
304:
303:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
282:
280:
276:
273:
270:
267:
263:
260:
259:
258:
256:
252:
248:
244:
239:
236:
232:
230:
222:
218:
214:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
174:
171:
156:
152:
148:
144:
141:
140:
139:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
390:
387:
353:
344:I have asked
341:
316:
307:
261:
240:
237:
233:
226:
198:
177:
158:
142:
127:Non-notable
126:
45:
43:
31:
28:
370:Ericwooten3
310:Ericwooten3
291:Ericwooten3
274:, and here
243:user:Goooh
217:user:Goooh
328:≈ jossi ≈
322:), is an
129:≈ jossi ≈
357:contribs
320:contribs
203:Eusebeus
121:View log
50:Philippe
271:, here
88:protect
83:history
365:WP:ORG
361:WP:SPA
332:(talk)
324:WP:SPA
266:WP:ORG
199:Delete
182:WP:ORG
178:Delete
147:WP:ORG
143:Delete
133:(talk)
116:delete
92:delete
46:Delete
347:Jossi
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
374:talk
351:talk
314:talk
295:talk
262:Keep
251:talk
207:talk
190:talk
151:WP:N
149:and
145:per
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
54:Talk
166:bli
376:)
297:)
257:)
253:)
247:DS
209:)
192:)
169:nd
163:ar
160:St
157:-
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
52:|
48:-
372:(
354:·
349:(
317:·
312:(
293:(
249:(
223::
205:(
188:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.