453:- Gotfrag is the goto source for eSports coverage, and any attempt to cover eSports in an encyclopedic fashion should cover Gotfrag. The issue is that there's few sources about the website itself, and you'll likely find the same issue with other trade publications. Given Odie's sources though, I think the subject does pass notability guidelines. -
411:
Ok, based on a couple of the sources cited above (especially the Kane book which does mention the site several times). I have striken my delete vote, but I encourage editors interested in the article to acutally cite some of these more notable sources in the article itself to avoid ending up here
276:
And the CNET piece is just a brief announcement of an buisness acquisition, which talks more about the company that acquired GotFrag than about GotFrag. Everything I found was either obvious promotioinal material or user contributed comments at sites like
165:
430:
If no one else does it at the end of the AfD I'll try to (at least adding some to external links.) Can't say I have much interest in the subject, but I agree they shouldi be added.
126:
159:
254:
396:
62:
17:
227:
for this site, and what references are used on the article now are all first-person (except the one cnet blog entry)... fails
483:
503:
36:
210:
180:
99:
94:
147:
435:
392:
103:
502:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
86:
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
417:
287:
384:
351:
141:
431:
388:
327:
240:
137:
173:
52:
49:
488:
465:
439:
421:
400:
368:
333:
312:
291:
266:
244:
214:
68:
413:
364:
282:
187:
347:
308:
262:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
354:
345:
342:
478:
474:
300:
228:
197:
457:
321:
236:
349:
278:
224:
232:
462:
454:
360:
153:
196:
No significant coverage in secondary reliable sources in Google to indicate meeting
304:
258:
90:
120:
201:
357:
344:"Gotfrag is the best source of gaming info for the hard-core community."
473:
Just ekes through the independent coverage of the site requirements of
82:
74:
353:. The game demos GotFrag archives were used in scientific research:
48:. The concerns of the "delete" !voters seem to have been addressed.
496:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
116:
112:
108:
172:
186:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
506:). No further edits should be made to this page.
376:I think Odie's sources prove that it is notable
255:list of video game related deletion discussions
8:
253:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
356:. Used as a source by GameSpot
1:
489:21:01, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
466:22:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
440:20:50, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
69:00:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
422:21:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
401:19:45, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
369:16:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
334:03:23, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
313:14:37, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
292:07:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
267:21:55, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
245:21:44, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
215:21:37, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
523:
499:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
380:a reliable source.
320:per all the above.
44:The result was
487:
404:
387:comment added by
269:
514:
501:
481:
460:
432:Martin Raybourne
403:
389:Martin Raybourne
381:
330:
324:
279:Urban Dictionary
249:
223:- I can find no
206:
191:
190:
176:
124:
106:
65:
60:
55:
34:
522:
521:
517:
516:
515:
513:
512:
511:
510:
504:deletion review
497:
458:
382:
328:
322:
213:
202:
133:
97:
81:
78:
63:
58:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
520:
518:
509:
508:
492:
491:
468:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
425:
424:
406:
405:
371:
336:
315:
294:
270:
247:
209:
194:
193:
130:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
519:
507:
505:
500:
494:
493:
490:
485:
480:
476:
472:
469:
467:
464:
461:
456:
452:
449:
448:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:
427:
426:
423:
419:
415:
414:Rusty Cashman
410:
409:
408:
407:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
379:
375:
372:
370:
366:
362:
358:
355:
352:
350:
348:
346:
343:
340:
337:
335:
332:
331:
325:
319:
316:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
295:
293:
289:
285:
284:
283:Rusty Cashman
280:
275:
271:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
207:
205:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
498:
495:
470:
450:
377:
373:
338:
326:
317:
296:
273:
272:
250:
220:
203:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
45:
43:
31:
28:
383:—Preceding
231:as well as
160:free images
237:Adolphus79
471:Weak keep
397:contribs
385:unsigned
361:Odie5533
299:- fails
211:Contribs
127:View log
341:- See:
305:Teancum
259:MrKIA11
166:WP refs
154:scholar
100:protect
95:history
83:GotFrag
75:GotFrag
50:King of
475:WP:WEB
455:hahnch
412:again.
318:Delete
301:WP:WEB
297:Delete
274:Delete
235:... -
229:WP:WEB
221:Delete
198:WP:WEB
138:Google
104:delete
484:cont.
329:Cobra
323:Glass
225:WP:RS
204:Leuko
181:JSTOR
142:books
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
477:. -
451:Keep
436:talk
418:talk
393:talk
374:Keep
365:talk
359:. --
339:Keep
309:talk
288:talk
263:talk
251:Note
241:talk
233:WP:V
174:FENS
148:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
46:keep
479:2/0
378:and
188:TWL
125:– (
438:)
420:)
399:)
395:•
367:)
311:)
303:--
290:)
281:.
265:)
257:.
243:)
200:.
168:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
67:♠
486:)
482:(
463:n
459:e
434:(
416:(
391:(
363:(
307:(
286:(
261:(
239:(
208:/
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
123:)
85:(
64:♣
59:♦
54:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.