Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Gothador

1012:

I also note that most of these were 'speedy deletes', unfortunately you and a few rogue admins seem to think notability is valid for a speedy delete, apparently it is not, i read the policy and it appears speedy deletes should only be for copyright issues. People like you will kill WP DarkSabre. I still note you have about ZERO actual proper edits to WP, you contribute NOTHING outside of 'Doom metal' which is about as notable as my arse, but delete anything that gets in your way using an incorrect method. WPs inherent beurocracy is the only reason you get away with it, because most of us don't have the time to fight all this rubbish. Back to the point, SeanKelly1986's links prove notability. Oh yes they do.

909:

brings, the amazing ability for a small company from Elgin, Scotland to create a game that spans the globe, can only be experienced and decided upon as an individual. Gothador will not be diminished if we are no longer listed in Knowledge (XXG), though the reverse should be assessed. If over one hundred thousand people play this online game with immense satisfaction and a website arbitrarily decides to delete our game from it's listing, then perhaps the people that enjoy the game could merely forget to surf to Knowledge (XXG). Word of mouth, or in this case, pixel, is more powerful than any advertisement. Gothador will still be there, and we'll have more time to commit to our online hobby. --

688:. The top link wont work on my PC, the same goes for the second, I'll have to check them later. Urban Dictionary nearly made me wet myself laughing. You genuinely believe that is a reliable source? A web site where anyone can submit any word they've made up and have a 99.9% chance of having it accepted? As for MPOGD, a listing on a database that aims to list every online game in existence is hardly a notable claim to fame. It's like to trying to argue that you should have an article because your names in the phone book. As for Answers.com, I think you'll find if you look closely you will see THEIR article is actually credited to Knowledge (XXG), as is nearly all their information. 740:(or possibly Database, can't remember without checking, but it doesn't affect the point). It lists online games, anyone can submit links to new games, which are then duly listed. I know because I submitted a couple myself. As for providing sources to prove the unreliability of a source, don't be absurd. You have to prove Urban Dictionary is reliable, not me prove it unreliable. And like I said with MPOGD, I've submitted things to Urban Dictionary myself. Anyone can sign up to be an editor and approve or disapprove of the new entries. I could join up, approve my own definition of myself and attempt to add a wikipedia article claiming 'but I'm listed on Urban Dictionary'. 790:

MMORPGs and part of the DELETION list I see that apparently other games are not being deleted. That to me indicates this whole session as having been started as a hatewar against the game and more accurately either its creators or a personal issue with another player. It would seem to me that if Gothador were to be dleted - one must delet ALL games that have any simillarities to each oher keeping (after much research) only those with the most orriginality and only within a generic group teh apparently oldest

379:. I would like to note that many of the previous posts are from former players of the game. This is a bit biased in my opinion. The article defines what the game is about and will be of interest to those who like to play MMRPG's in the future. The players might want to be more active in updating the article though. I did a google search myself and found many entries that were related to the game including the Wikki article. I would vote to definitely keep this article 1038:. I look forward to arbitration, then we can tell them who suggested I look at all these articles in the first place. But if we can move away from your personal grudge against me and actually discuss THIS article, that'd be great. Of the 5 sources provided, the top 2 I can't check on this PC, they wont load for some reason, I'll have to look over them later. But the last 3 sources would be laughed out of ANY article they were included in. 1466:- Yes - Ive posted from a single use account - I dont deny it - Untill this was brought to my attention I didnt even realise there was a registration and "argument" section in Knowledge (XXG). Theres mention above of the game being mentioned ina local newspaper - agreed - it was. it WAS ALSO quite recently (1-2 months ago) discussed in an article in a NATIONAL DUTCH newpaper as it has a large following in Holland 134: 995:

unbiased and go with entirely factual evidence, you'd visit the site and take the two-week trial so that you can have an opinion that is based on actual usage and not numbers. If Knowledge (XXG) wants to base it's listings on random ratings and visits, then you should probably start deleting articles, starting at the very first one... --

777:- why - 1/ Ive read the summary of the game and whilst it is slightly out of date (but as the game is alwyas expanding it could be out of date withing hours of typeing) is quite acurate and factual. It makes no appearance as an advertisement - simply an article on a game -- 2/ There is one point made earlier that QUOTE : --> 1083:

Well you have recieved more posts I see and some good articles. There has been nothing but negative and harsh feedback to those replies, not just mine. Knowledge (XXG) will of course, do what it wants with this article and that is fine because that is their choice. Other concerns have however been

984:

No. Alexa measures site traffic, Google is a search engine. There as different as cars and yachts. Of course more people go to google than Alexa. Like you said most people don't even know about Alexa until they are told their 'notable' website doesn't rank very highly on it in an AfD on wikipedia. If

475:

any of the comments here? I'm not vehement against the entry, just people who make keep arguments that are absolutely not based on any wikipedia policies bar how not to argue for a keep, and people who can only make arguments based round 'conspiracy theories.' Policies cited as a reason for deletion:

1139:

list)). The actual results (if you follow it a page at a time): 94 websites are found. None of them are reviews, none of them are mentions in reports or news. The only sources you have been able to provide yourselves are downlink link pages that feature, at most, a paragraph describing the game. Far

1090:

I am beginning to understand why more and more college professors will no longer accept Knowledge (XXG) in their thesis papers due to the process that is being used to edit the articles. You can delete my account after this for I will not attempt to help anymore. I have tried on other articles and

1011:

Yet another one Darksabre? Tsk tsk. You have somthing against these game don't you... I will be taking the whole thing to arbitration the minute I figure out how. I don't think the destruction of 40 odd articles in the same category is on. Not without a proper debate on the nature of the category...

434:

I stand corrected, I have no proof, but I do recognize at least one of the names. I am not saying that there is a 'conspiracy.' So far there seems to be little to no actual discussion, just delete or speedy delete with little to no reason attached. I'm not sure what 'proof' you are looking for, I

974:

Funny, until you'd mentioned it, I'd never heard of an Alexa rank, and I've been an avid internet user since 1996. Google is far more popular to the average person, topped only by MSN and Yahoo... and even Alexa shows that on it's sites. So for the average person, IE, the majority of people that

908:

Any argument can be made as to why Gothador should or should not remain in Knowledge (XXG), but the final decision is not going to be made due to who can try and defame another person. The only way that a fair and impartial decision can be made is by playing the game. The comradery that the game

1350:

Radneto is claming he read.) The 5 star rating is not an indicator of notability, as you could have requested fans of the game repeatedly vote it 5 star to improve it's standing. On the flip side, someone could just as easily vote it 1 star repeatedly and lower it's rating. A website for the game

1104:

DarkSabre, since you yourself claimed that one should join and use the Alexa website before passing judgement on it, shouldn't you, by those standards that you set, do the same with Gothador before passing judgement regarding its validity? This is not a stab at you or the deletion post, merely an

699:

I would like to see you back up your argument against Urban Dictionary with some sort of source. I don't see anything about the MPOGD site trying to "List every online game in existence" as well. In response to your comment about Answers.com ... that pretty much says the article IS being used and

994:

Using a virtually unknown website that measures the entire internet's traffic is somewhat like trying to use a telescope to count every star in the sky. It's not going to be as accurate as some people would like to believe, as every website is going to be biased. If you were truly trying to be

789:

Delete. Outwar clones are a dime a dozen (Urban Dead, Earth: 2025, Nation States, Starships!, Kingdom of Loathing, etc). No notability per WP:WEB, no article. Zetawoof(ζ) 23:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC) <<<<<<<<< there are many outwar clones. Having read part of the list of

1105:

attempt to let you have a bit more insight as to why people might be fighting to keep the article on WP. In fact, I would be willing to pay for you to have a trial membership for those two weeks. (Pardon my ignorance regarding how to use this site. I'm trying, but internet impaired)~~Persephone

756:

Trivial coverage, such as (1) newspaper articles that simply report the internet address, (2) newspaper articles that simply report the times at which such content is updated or made available, (3) a brief summary of the nature of the content or the publication of internet addresses and site or

1173:

right now. All of which have sourcing ten times better than this article, and two are gone anyway. If there is any kind of merit at all, it get's my vote to keep. This article is just an unsourced advertisement, and a recreation of deleted material. It should have been speedy deleted long ago.

1284:

As respectfully as I am able: Please read the notability rules. Anybody can put five stars on anything at tucows, and as for the game creator, if you think a minor plug in a local paper makes him noteworthy, then please feel free to create an article about the guy. Please sign your comments.

887:

created a game that has spanned the globe in a matter of months, and has managed to sustain that game for years. This MMORPG game that we are currently discussing has an amazing 103978 registered users for their forum which is conjoined with their game, Gothador. That can be shown here

505:

Thank you for pointing out my faults DarkSaber2k. I will do what I can to research the links you posted and add to that. I would also like to know how you only got 10 hits on a google search. I simply typed in 'Gothador' and returned, as I said, at least 10 pages. Happy surfing

881:

This is a topic that seems to be slowly spiralling into a heated debate, and the best way to battle in this is with logic and facts. I will make it a point to keep my facts succinct and to the point to avoid any undue distress to any of the parties involved with this discussion.

1025:

Got you facts wrong again Bj? Tsk tsk. Check who nominated the article. Guess what? Not me. As for just editing Doom Metal, your very bad at making people look bad you know. Even cursory examination of my contributions shows I'm active in numerous articles from

1064:? For a laugh? Failure to assert notability is practically the ONLY criteria for a speedy deletion, along with advertising, nonsense pages and attack pages. It's so specific I'm amazed anyone could mis-interpret to be solely about copyright violation. 407:

And how exactly can you tell they are former players just from their posts in this AfD? Maybe you could tell us how your search yields 'many' entries as sources, when another editors yielded only 10. Do you have any argument that isn't based in

965:), yet this is not the case. The article makes no mention of winning an award (Criteria 2) and makes no mention of being distributed through a notable method (Criteria 3). The article has no Secondary sources, required to establish notability. 823:

As a matter of fact, I've tagged over 30 Browser-based MMOs for speedy deletion in the last couple of weeks whilst patrolling lists for accumulated junk articles, all but 2 of which were deleted for actually being non-notable. So once again

424:

and attempting to unveil a 'conspiracy' of former players? You've failed to address the notability issue also. Whilst it is by no means the be-all and end-all of notability, this sites Alexa Ranking seems to be especially poor.

435:

did a google search and it returned at least 10 pages of content. Others have failed to show any proof at all or even leave a remark. I am also curious as to why you are so vehement against this entry.

892:

Fact: Even with that many registered users, Hunted Cow Studios manages at least one game upgrade per week along with weekly updates and their recently implemented 24 hour live support feature.

141: 122: 754:

I rest my case about Urban Dictionary not being a reliable source. And those other links check out as download descritptions, which are trivial mentions, not media coverage.

1346:

would be another thing this guy should (and therefore probably wont) read. Tucows, as a download site, is only a trivial mention on a download page. (Per the same

949:

or where it ranks on a google search (for websites, people generally hold an Alexa rank in higher regard than a google search). It also doesn't matter how much

1503: 282: 492:. Knowledge (XXG) policies cited as a reason for keeping the article: None. Additionally, 'I recognize one of the names' is an extremely weak reason to claim 564:

Even if you had spelt the name right, you'd have found 94 websites of download directory listings and fansites. Not a single review or news mention.

1196: 538:

So it's up to you to provide links to these 'at least 10 pages' (so I'm expecting more than 10 if there are 'at least' that many) that satisfy the

1449:

If pointing out to people why their notability is non-existent in the most thorough way imaginable is rudeness, then yes, I was rude in this AfD.

895: 849:

KINDLY don't lump people who are posting things without any sort of sources, and those who ARE posting relevant sources in the same group.

150: 1438: 1108: 714: 671: 609: 523: 452: 396: 1442: 1389: 1335: 1269: 1116: 931: 812: 718: 675: 613: 536:

The obligation to provide a reliable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not with those seeking to remove it.

527: 456: 400: 180: 1517: 1381: 1227:- Lacking in reliable/secondary sources. Urban Dictionary, FilePlanet, etc... are not reliable/independent sources of information. 421: 413: 17: 808: 338: 417: 927: 496:

It's a big wide web out there, and many time I've found someone else using 'my' name, and I'm positive I'm not the only one.

1031: 166: 1331: 1265: 828:

FrankNStien, there is no conspiracy outside of your own head. Now do you have an argument for keeping that isn't based on

589: 247: 95: 90: 1600: 1400:

I find it upsetting to see some of the comments levelled at DarkSaber2k above. Can users like Bjrobinson please review

1060:. Failure to assert notability is not a speedy criteria? Then why o why does practicly EVERY speedy tag say 'Blah blah 829: 36: 99: 1056:

And as for Speedy Delete being only for copyright issues, which page did you read? Because it sure as heck wasn't

985:

you were looking up what time a TV show starts, would you go look up the ratings for the show, or use a TV guide?

139:

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is

1306:- It seems the above articles are proof enough to justify the keeping of the article. There are also fan sites - 82: 212: 1599:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a

35:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a

1186:

I just realized that almost everyone voting to keep is a single purpose account! WHY ARE WE WASTING OUR TIME?

1434: 1112: 710: 667: 605: 519: 448: 392: 804: 196: 170: 1511: 1385: 942: 625: 155: 1430: 1422: 1404:? There's nothing personal in this afd nomination, and I would've tagged it myself had I seen it first. 1092: 923: 850: 706: 701: 663: 655: 601: 593: 515: 507: 444: 436: 388: 380: 800: 791: 953:. For all these 10,000 individual pages that have been mentioned, it should be quite easy to provide 950: 833: 409: 298:- A google search reveals 10 hits, only 2 of which are in context, 0 of which are reliable sources. 1585: 1569: 1548: 1521: 1477: 1453: 1425: 1408: 1365: 1318: 1289: 1252: 1231: 1215: 1202: 1190: 1178: 1152: 1095: 1068: 1051: 1042: 1016: 999: 996: 989: 979: 976: 969: 919: 913: 910: 862: 853: 844: 794: 765: 744: 692: 658: 631: 596: 568: 559: 551:

My bad, I mis-spelt the name during the search (typing 'gothandor' by mistake) Article still fails

546: 510: 500: 439: 429: 383: 369: 357: 346: 317: 302: 289: 275: 258: 86: 64: 1057: 465:

A google search reveals 10 hits, only 2 of which are in context, 0 of which are reliable sources.

1565: 1314:

which also fall into the subsections of the afore mentioned article and also prove notability. -

752: 588:, google search returns approximately 10,300 hits, 16 relevant unique hits on the first 2 pages, 366: 334: 202: 133: 1418: 1401: 1170: 1166: 342: 1162: 1582: 1507: 1327: 1286: 1261: 1212: 1187: 1175: 314: 78: 70: 29:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

1486: 1471: 1135:

Each - removes those results, removing wikipedia and all message board (which are top of the

904: 1474: 1450: 1421:

as well. Being rude to people who feel that this page is notable is quite counterproductive.

1405: 1362: 1228: 1199: 1149: 1065: 1039: 986: 966: 859: 841: 762: 741: 689: 628: 565: 556: 543: 497: 466: 426: 326: 299: 286: 272: 255: 1557: 1347: 1343: 962: 755: 552: 489: 477: 350: 268: 57: 1048: 1013: 647: 1136: 975:

create website traffic, they are going to get to their sites via MSN, Yahoo or Google. --

958: 946: 685: 539: 485: 49: 1470:

You got a name for the newspaper and a link to article, or have we gotta guess? Oh and,

906:

These are sites that are regularly visited by hundreds of thousands of gamers everyday.

1530: 639: 590:

http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/topnews/wpn-60-200701122007TheYearoftheOnlineGame.htm

1495: 1491: 1352: 1141: 954: 535: 481: 53: 1561: 1035: 354: 858:

When you finally post a reliable source, I'll consider changing how I think of you.

1323: 1315: 1257: 1249: 898: 230: 218: 186: 116: 165:

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to

1211:

LOL, I was wondering where all these single purpose accounts were coming from!

61: 651: 330: 654:, www.answers.com/topic/gothador . What do YOU define as a "Reliable source"? 1027: 250:

of its website has been fluctuating, but since February it's over 100.000.

643: 1361:

required. And the same goes for the fan site. Hardly independent is it.

901: 585: 1091:

found pretty much the same attitudes. Thank you and have a nice day.

471:

Failed to show proof or remark on the sources you say? Have you even

1241: 1245: 759:(4) content descriptions in internet directories or online stores. 1378:

KEEP - Matt Brennen your a tool, and I know where your at bish!

1307: 1593:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.

736:(resetting indent) MPOGD is called the Multiplayer Online Game 638:

Merely pointing out where in the article it was. More sources:

494:

many of the previous posts are from former players of the game.

128: 1244:) and the game creator was featured in the local newspaper ( 955:

Multiple, independent non-trivial third party media mentions

889: 159:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, 1311: 885: 1240:

Keep - The game was reviewed and given 5 stars by Tucows (

1581:, this article has been recreated at least once already. 1161:

I fight tooth and nail for these games. I fought to keep

149:

among Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has

1148:

I really don't see what more this is to say about this.

1499: 894:

Fact: Gothador has over 10,00 listings on Google alone

648:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=gothador

624:

So your saying this must be considered notable because

112: 108: 104: 1303: 640:

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.gothador.com

592:

shows as #7 with average time logged (As of 12JAN07)

39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1577:Thanks for reminding me to request the article be 1131:- I just finished the following search on google. 534:I didn't do the search, Masamune did, so ask him. 1603:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1504:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Hoofmaster 267:- No assertion of notability, unsourced. Fails 947:How many link directories it's been listed in 179:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected 8: 1417:Please feel free to cite DarkSaber2k on the 941:The fact of the matter is it doesn't matter 840:the other two 'keep' sayers stated earlier? 1351:developer is hardly (here we go again) the 1062:fails to assert to notability of this topic 943:how many people have played it for how long 652:http://www.mpogd.com/games/game.asp?ID=2688 1500:recreation of a previously deleted article 1133:Gothador -wikipedia -forum -message -board 153:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and 414:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS#It doesn't do any harm 897:including listings on Big Online Games, 281:Note: This debate has been added to the 173:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. 951:high regard you have for the developers 644:http://www.gamewyrd.com/others/cyber884 246:Online RPG, no evidence of notability. 1529:A7 web content, and block the socks. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 586:http://www.tucows.com/preview/363018 555:though, so my opinion still stands. 1302:Well according to the rules here - 626:a lot of time is spent on the site? 422:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS#It's interesting 916:NytDunne - Gothador Supporter Nyt 24: 1146:independent third-party mentions. 684:I don't define reliable sources, 1242:http://tucows.com/preview/363018 132: 1472:you should have a look at this. 1246:http://72.29.72.185/article.jpg 1032:Command & Conquer: Generals 836:, or is that all you have like 1506:, which seems to be related. — 1308:http://www.guildofwisdom.co.uk 1304:http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:WEB 418:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS#It's useful 1: 169:on the part of others and to 463:You stand corrected again: 329:clones are a dime a dozen ( 1620: 1319:23:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1290:21:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1253:22:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1232:21:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1216:20:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1203:20:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1191:19:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1179:17:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1153:17:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1096:16:36, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1069:15:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1052:15:31, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1043:15:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1017:15:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1000:16:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 990:15:54, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 980:15:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 970:15:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 914:15:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 863:14:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 854:14:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 845:13:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 795:13:45, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 766:17:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 745:13:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 693:12:54, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 659:12:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 632:12:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 597:12:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 547:11:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 511:11:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 501:11:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 469:17:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 440:11:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 430:11:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 384:11:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 370:00:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 358:23:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 349:, etc). No notability per 318:20:54, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 303:17:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 290:09:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 276:08:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 259:07:39, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 1498:, and apparently it is a 1198:Well here's the problem! 1596:Please do not modify it. 1560:, as pointed out above. 1312:http://www.huntedcow.com 884:Fact: Hunted Cow Studios 32:Please do not modify it. 1586:20:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 1570:20:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 1549:19:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 1522:18:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 1478:13:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 1454:10:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 1426:10:23, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 1409:10:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 1366:08:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 1356:independent third party 569:10:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 560:09:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 211:; accounts blocked for 181:single-purpose accounts 151:policies and guidelines 65:00:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC) 52:were not presented for 48:. Multiple non-trivial 1169:, and am fighting for 308:Speedy Delete and SALT 1443:few or no other edits 1390:few or no other edits 1353:multiple non-trivial 1336:few or no other edits 1270:few or no other edits 1117:few or no other edits 932:few or no other edits 813:few or no other edits 719:few or no other edits 676:few or no other edits 614:few or no other edits 528:few or no other edits 457:few or no other edits 401:few or no other edits 283:list of CVG deletions 58:notability guidelines 1445:outside this topic. 1392:outside this topic. 1338:outside this topic. 1272:outside this topic. 1119:outside this topic. 934:outside this topic. 815:outside this topic. 721:outside this topic. 678:outside this topic. 616:outside this topic. 530:outside this topic. 459:outside this topic. 403:outside this topic. 365:. fails notability. 1184:Yet Another Comment 347:Kingdom of Loathing 163:by counting votes. 142:not a majority vote 1137:unreliable sources 830:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS 1568: 1446: 1393: 1339: 1273: 1120: 1047:Oh yeah.... wow! 935: 903:and File Planet. 816: 722: 679: 617: 531: 460: 404: 244: 243: 240: 167:assume good faith 1611: 1598: 1564: 1546: 1543: 1540: 1537: 1428: 1379: 1321: 1255: 1106: 917: 798: 704: 661: 599: 513: 442: 386: 292: 238: 226: 210: 194: 175: 145:, but instead a 136: 129: 120: 102: 50:reliable sources 34: 1619: 1618: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1601:deletion review 1594: 1544: 1541: 1538: 1535: 961:(Criteria 1 of 584:. Is relevent, 540:reliable source 280: 228: 216: 200: 184: 171:sign your posts 93: 77: 74: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1617: 1615: 1606: 1605: 1589: 1588: 1572: 1551: 1531:Andrew Lenahan 1524: 1481: 1480: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1412: 1411: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1359:media mentions 1310:and of course 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1235: 1234: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1206: 1205: 1156: 1155: 1124: 1122: 1121: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1020: 1019: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 992: 982: 972: 907: 893: 891: 883: 879: 878: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 818: 817: 771: 770: 769: 768: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 686:wikipedia does 681: 680: 619: 618: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 549: 503: 432: 373: 372: 360: 353:, no article. 320: 305: 293: 278: 242: 241: 137: 127: 126: 73: 68: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1616: 1604: 1602: 1597: 1591: 1590: 1587: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1573: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1552: 1550: 1547: 1532: 1528: 1527:Speedy delete 1525: 1523: 1519: 1516: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1502:... also see 1501: 1497: 1494:to establish 1493: 1489: 1488: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1476: 1473: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1465: 1455: 1452: 1448: 1447: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1431:SeanKelly1986 1427: 1424: 1423:SeanKelly1986 1420: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1410: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1398: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1367: 1364: 1360: 1358: 1357: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1320: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1291: 1288: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1254: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1233: 1230: 1226: 1223: 1222: 1217: 1214: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1204: 1201: 1197: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1177: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1154: 1151: 1147: 1145: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1109:67.174.47.115 1103: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1094: 1093:Midnightmedic 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1070: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1050: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1041: 1037: 1036:Metalocalypse 1033: 1029: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1018: 1015: 1010: 1007: 1006: 1001: 998: 993: 991: 988: 983: 981: 978: 973: 971: 968: 964: 960: 956: 952: 948: 944: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 933: 929: 925: 921: 915: 912: 905: 902: 899: 896: 890: 886: 877: 874: 873: 864: 861: 857: 856: 855: 852: 851:SeanKelly1986 848: 847: 846: 843: 839: 835: 831: 827: 826:Midnightmedic 822: 821: 820: 819: 814: 810: 806: 802: 796: 793: 776: 773: 772: 767: 764: 761: 760: 753: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 743: 739: 720: 716: 712: 708: 707:SeanKelly1986 703: 702:SeanKelly1986 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 691: 687: 683: 682: 677: 673: 669: 665: 664:SeanKelly1986 660: 657: 656:SeanKelly1986 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 630: 627: 623: 622: 621: 620: 615: 611: 607: 603: 602:SeanKelly1986 598: 595: 594:SeanKelly1986 591: 587: 583: 580: 570: 567: 563: 562: 561: 558: 554: 550: 548: 545: 541: 537: 533: 532: 529: 525: 521: 517: 516:Midnightmedic 512: 509: 508:Midnightmedic 504: 502: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 474: 470: 468: 462: 461: 458: 454: 450: 446: 445:Midnightmedic 441: 438: 437:Midnightmedic 433: 431: 428: 423: 419: 415: 411: 406: 405: 402: 398: 394: 390: 389:Midnightmedic 385: 382: 381:Midnightmedic 378: 375: 374: 371: 368: 367:Sephiroth BCR 364: 361: 359: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 339:Nation States 336: 332: 328: 324: 321: 319: 316: 313: 309: 306: 304: 301: 297: 294: 291: 288: 284: 279: 277: 274: 270: 266: 265:Speedy Delete 263: 262: 261: 260: 257: 253: 249: 236: 232: 224: 220: 214: 208: 204: 198: 192: 188: 182: 178: 174: 172: 168: 162: 158: 157: 152: 148: 144: 143: 138: 135: 131: 130: 124: 118: 114: 110: 106: 101: 97: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 75: 72: 69: 67: 66: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 1595: 1592: 1583:Matt Brennen 1578: 1574: 1553: 1534: 1526: 1514: 1508:72.75.73.158 1484: 1463: 1462: 1382:203.14.53.15 1355: 1354: 1287:Matt Brennen 1224: 1213:Matt Brennen 1188:Matt Brennen 1183: 1182: 1176:Matt Brennen 1158: 1157: 1143: 1132: 1128: 1123: 1101: 1089: 1061: 1008: 900:Tucows.com, 880: 875: 837: 825: 797:FrankNStien 774: 758: 737: 735: 581: 493: 472: 464: 376: 362: 322: 315:Matt Brennen 311: 307: 295: 264: 251: 245: 234: 222: 213:sockpuppetry 206: 195:; suspected 190: 176: 164: 160: 154: 146: 140: 54:verification 45: 43: 31: 28: 1556:as failing 1485:Delete and 1475:DarkSaber2k 1451:DarkSaber2k 1441:) has made 1406:Marasmusine 1388:) has made 1363:DarkSaber2k 1334:) has made 1268:) has made 1229:Wickethewok 1200:DarkSaber2k 1150:DarkSaber2k 1144:non-trivial 1115:) has made 1066:DarkSaber2k 1040:DarkSaber2k 987:DarkSaber2k 967:DarkSaber2k 930:) has made 860:DarkSaber2k 842:DarkSaber2k 811:) has made 801:FrankNStien 792:FrankNStien 763:DarkSaber2k 742:DarkSaber2k 717:) has made 690:DarkSaber2k 674:) has made 629:DarkSaber2k 612:) has made 566:DarkSaber2k 557:Marasmusine 544:DarkSaber2k 526:) has made 498:DarkSaber2k 467:Marasmusine 455:) has made 427:DarkSaber2k 399:) has made 335:Earth: 2025 300:Marasmusine 287:DarkSaber2k 273:DarkSaber2k 256:Mike Rosoft 1490:... lacks 1171:Starships! 1167:Tribalwars 1049:Bjrobinson 1014:Bjrobinson 834:WP:ILIKEIT 700:referenced 542:criteria. 410:WP:ILIKEIT 343:Starships! 331:Urban Dead 248:Alexa rank 147:discussion 1163:Iselkampf 1142:multiple 1140:short of 1058:WP:SPEEDY 1028:Manhunt 2 957:that are 738:Directory 203:canvassed 197:canvassed 156:consensus 1562:Tony Fox 1518:contribs 1439:contribs 1419:WP:CIVIL 1402:WP:CIVIL 1342:I think 1332:contribs 1266:contribs 997:NytDunne 977:NytDunne 959:reliable 928:contribs 920:NytDunne 911:NytDunne 809:contribs 715:contribs 672:contribs 610:contribs 524:contribs 453:contribs 397:contribs 355:Zetawoof 235:username 229:{{subst: 223:username 217:{{subst: 207:username 201:{{subst: 191:username 185:{{subst: 123:View log 79:Gothador 71:Gothador 1575:Comment 1464:COMMENT 1324:Radneto 1316:Radneto 1258:Radneto 1250:Radneto 1159:Comment 1129:Comment 1084:voiced. 312:WP:SNOW 199:users: 96:protect 91:history 1579:SALTED 1566:(arf!) 1558:WP:WEB 1554:Delete 1348:WP:WEB 1344:WP:COI 1225:Delete 1034:, via 963:WP:WEB 553:WP:ATT 490:WP:ATT 478:WP:WEB 363:Delete 351:WP:WEB 327:Outwar 323:Delete 296:Delete 269:WP:ATT 252:Delete 100:delete 62:Wafulz 46:delete 788:: --> 787:: --> 786:: --> 785:: --> 784:: --> 783:: --> 782:: --> 781:: --> 780:: --> 779:: --> 778:: --> 506:today 486:WP:RS 177:Note: 117:views 109:watch 105:links 16:< 1512:talk 1496:WP:N 1492:WP:A 1487:salt 1435:talk 1386:talk 1328:talk 1262:talk 1248:) - 1113:talk 1102:KEEP 1009:Keep 924:talk 876:Keep 832:and 805:talk 775:Keep 711:talk 668:talk 606:talk 582:Keep 520:talk 482:WP:N 473:read 449:talk 393:talk 377:Keep 310:re: 254:. - 113:logs 87:talk 83:edit 60:. -- 56:and 1542:bli 1030:to 838:you 420:, 231:csp 227:or 219:csm 187:spa 161:not 121:– ( 1545:nd 1539:ar 1536:St 1533:- 1520:) 1437:• 1429:— 1380:— 1330:• 1322:— 1264:• 1256:— 1165:, 1107:— 945:, 926:• 918:— 807:• 799:— 713:• 705:— 670:• 662:— 650:, 646:, 642:, 608:• 600:— 522:• 514:— 488:, 484:, 480:, 451:• 443:— 416:, 412:, 395:• 387:— 345:, 341:, 337:, 333:, 325:. 285:. 271:. 237:}} 225:}} 215:: 209:}} 193:}} 183:: 115:| 111:| 107:| 103:| 98:| 94:| 89:| 85:| 1515:· 1510:( 1433:( 1384:( 1326:( 1260:( 1111:( 922:( 803:( 709:( 666:( 604:( 518:( 447:( 391:( 239:. 233:| 221:| 205:| 189:| 125:) 119:) 81:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Gothador - Knowledge (XXG)

Index