204:]. The BMJ article is a report on an exhibition of torture instruments - this cannot have included "goat tongue" as no instrument was involved - it is just ghastly things with spikes and stuff. None of the other references to the travelling exhibition mention this improbable torture. The book given as a reference is incorrectly titled - it is actually "In Search of Dracula: A True History of Dracula and Vampire Legends". Astonishingly it is available at my local university library, and I suppose I could have a look - but read what is said - Dracula skinned the feet first then dripped salt water on them - goat involvement nil!! Sorry, but all my (goat's) b******s detectors are flashing red.
69:
The sole reference in this article has been questioned. A google search fails to find any historical acounts of this supposed form of torture. If it is practised by fetishists or game show hosts today, it is very non-notable- googling for the term reveals mainly a culinary term and links to pictures
143:
looks like a reliable source to confirm its existence, and if the book in question can be checked to verify that citation is correct, then that makes this notable - has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial reliable published sources. I admit that I was drawn to participation in this AfD in the
202:] is the home of the torture exhibition (the link to the English version may not work in Firefox), however the only mention of goat I found is to goatskin trousers (in this document
148:, but going on the Google hits it sounds like people think it's an urban legend, but actually seemed to have taken place in real life throughout the course of history.--
200:
Reality check - you would die of old age before the wretched goat got through the thick calluses on your mediaeval feet! OK some research: This site
186:
156:
17:
53:
83:
232:
36:
231:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
49:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
140:
180:
150:
122:
213:
191:
161:
129:
105:
87:
57:
209:
101:
63:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
145:
114:
77:
205:
97:
178:
given the citation I've found? Yeah, I strike my very weak keep in favour of a merge.--
175:
71:
225:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
139:. I was going to say delete, but it appears not to be a hoax.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
235:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
144:hope of finding another addition to
24:
1:
214:22:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
192:17:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
162:17:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
130:16:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
106:14:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
88:13:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
58:06:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
252:
228:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
70:of a goat's tongue.
243:
230:
126:
118:
74:
34:
251:
250:
246:
245:
244:
242:
241:
240:
239:
233:deletion review
226:
190:
187:r e s e a r c h
160:
157:r e s e a r c h
124:
116:
113:- Npn-Notable.
72:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
249:
247:
238:
237:
221:
220:
219:
218:
217:
216:
195:
194:
184:
176:tickle torture
165:
164:
154:
136:Very weak keep
132:
108:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
248:
236:
234:
229:
223:
222:
215:
211:
207:
203:
201:
199:
198:
197:
196:
193:
189:
188:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:Or how about
169:
168:
167:
166:
163:
159:
158:
153:
152:
147:
142:
138:
137:
133:
131:
128:
127:
120:
119:
112:
109:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:Speedy Delete
92:
91:
90:
89:
85:
82:
79:
75:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
227:
224:
185:
179:
171:
155:
149:
135:
134:
123:
115:
110:
93:
80:
68:
45:
43:
31:
28:
64:Goat tongue
206:Springnuts
98:Springnuts
96:- hoax.
146:WP:DAFT
117:Valley
111:Delete
73:Lurker
46:delete
181:h i s
172:merge
151:h i s
16:<
210:talk
141:This
125:city
102:talk
84:done
78:said
54:talk
174:to
212:)
104:)
86:)
56:)
50:DS
48:.
208:(
121:2
100:(
81:·
76:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.