Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Godzilla (2012 film) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

498:
change the article. Not a big deal. But Godzilla is generally notable. Like James Bond or Batman or Spider-man. Even if the movie fails to be made, the attempt will probably be notable. If we were to put the content into the Godzilla (franchise) article, it would still be notable. The odds are more than likely that the movie is going to be made. If the movie is not made, we can put the content into the franchise article then.
596:. I actually tried adding more sources in an early edit and it was reverted. The film attempt is notable, particularly considering it is a franchise project and is based on an endearing icon. There's definitely a lot of interest in the project, even among non-fans, as the Google statistic above shows. And I will point out 497:
Admittedly so, but I suggest that that's a minor point. I think the problem up to this time with the article has been the weak editing and lack of citations. It did not seem clear that the movie project was serious. I think with Legendary and Warners, it is serious. If the movie changes name, we
460:
I think the movie project passes the general notability test. Google has over 84,000 hits for the words Godzilla AND reboot. Even if the movie is not made, this project has garnered lots of attention. I believe there is more information to be available this month from the various conventions.
410:
and the film templates currently used in the article should then be removed... as until filming actually commences, it is a "non-film" but film-related project article. To avoid confusions in such cases, only film articles are to use film
162: 377: 117: 156: 343:
there's not enough decent, reliably sourced, noteworthy information to make a worthwhile article and it's just a magnet for fans to post the latest rumour they've heard.
247: 122: 90: 85: 94: 77: 485:
Yet we don't know whether the movie will indeed be released in 2012. A few problems in pre-production, and the title might just be false. --
177: 144: 17: 232: 138: 624: 535:
and did not exist at the time of this nomination. These must be taken in consideration when closing this discussion. --
36: 134: 609: 588: 568: 542: 517: 492: 480: 450: 426: 391: 351: 331: 303: 283: 265: 237: 207: 59: 423: 388: 81: 376:
last March, and that preliminary concept art was released last July at Comicon. Nothing firmer has come forward.
184: 623:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
584: 605: 150: 416: 381: 369: 73: 65: 531:
It appears that some of the references used in the article as of this writing appeared in the media
361: 221: 170: 552: 580: 511: 474: 444: 373: 325: 230: 600:
had it's own article for quite a while during production and it never reached filming either. --
217: 279: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
601: 293: 194: 193:
Contested prod. Movie currently in the planning stages, and even that is uncertain. Fails
289: 55: 309: 501: 464: 434: 315: 256: 225: 561: 275: 111: 345: 379:
While this might eventually be a terrific article, it just ain't ready yet.
50: 412: 555:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
402:
per new sources available showing more coverage of this project.
617:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
372:. The article itself states that the rights were acquired by 414:
When filming commences the templates can be brought back.
308:(From wp:nff) The production itself is notable per the 107: 103: 99: 169: 560:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 183: 431:That's appropriate. I have no objection to that. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 627:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 242: 248:list of Film-related deletion discussions 246:: This debate has been included in the 579:, clearly enough reliable sources now. 406:if kept, the title should be moved to 292:telling us that principal photography 222:Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 533:while this discussion was open 1: 610:03:33, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 589:01:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 569:00:47, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 543:15:30, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 518:15:51, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 493:15:14, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 481:14:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 451:23:33, 5 September 2010 (UTC) 427:00:29, 5 September 2010 (UTC) 392:01:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 352:20:18, 1 September 2010 (UTC) 332:15:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 304:03:12, 1 September 2010 (UTC) 218:notability criteria for films 60:04:24, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 408:Godzilla (2012 film project) 284:23:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC) 266:19:26, 31 August 2010 (UTC) 238:14:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC) 208:13:32, 31 August 2010 (UTC) 644: 274:the movie is being made. 620:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 598:Godzilla 3D To The Max 529:Note to closing admin: 310:notability guidelines 370:Godzilla (franchise) 74:Godzilla (2012 film) 66:Godzilla (2012 film) 288:Can you point to a 374:Legendary Pictures 44:The result was 571: 268: 264: 251: 216:as article fails 635: 622: 566: 559: 557: 540: 514: 509: 506: 490: 477: 472: 469: 447: 442: 439: 419: 384: 348: 328: 323: 320: 301: 294:has indeed begun 263: 260: 254: 252: 228: 205: 188: 187: 173: 125: 115: 97: 34: 643: 642: 638: 637: 636: 634: 633: 632: 631: 625:deletion review 618: 562: 550: 536: 512: 502: 499: 486: 475: 465: 462: 445: 435: 432: 417: 382: 346: 326: 316: 313: 297: 290:reliable source 258: 255: 235: 226: 201: 130: 121: 88: 72: 69: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 641: 639: 630: 629: 613: 612: 591: 573: 572: 558: 547: 546: 545: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 455: 454: 453: 397: 396: 395: 364:, and perhaps 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 269: 240: 233: 191: 190: 127: 123:AfD statistics 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 640: 628: 626: 621: 615: 614: 611: 607: 603: 599: 595: 592: 590: 586: 582: 581:Peter Karlsen 578: 575: 574: 570: 567: 565: 556: 554: 549: 548: 544: 539: 534: 530: 527: 526: 519: 515: 507: 505: 496: 495: 494: 489: 484: 483: 482: 478: 470: 468: 459: 456: 452: 448: 440: 438: 430: 429: 428: 425: 424: 421: 420: 413: 409: 405: 401: 398: 394: 393: 390: 389: 386: 385: 378: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 354: 353: 350: 349: 342: 339: 333: 329: 321: 319: 311: 307: 306: 305: 300: 295: 291: 287: 286: 285: 281: 277: 273: 270: 267: 262: 261: 249: 245: 241: 239: 236: 231: 229: 223: 219: 215: 212: 211: 210: 209: 204: 200: 196: 186: 182: 179: 176: 172: 168: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 136: 133: 132:Find sources: 128: 124: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 619: 616: 597: 593: 576: 563: 551: 537: 532: 528: 503: 487: 466: 457: 436: 422: 415: 407: 403: 399: 387: 380: 365: 357: 356: 344: 340: 317: 298: 271: 257: 243: 213: 202: 198: 192: 180: 174: 166: 159: 153: 147: 141: 131: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 602:JohnVMaster 368:for now to 157:free images 538:Blanchardb 488:Blanchardb 411:templates. 362:WP:TOOSOON 299:Blanchardb 203:Blanchardb 541:-- timed 491:-- timed 400:Week keep 302:-- timed 259:Gongshow 206:-- timed 553:Relisted 504:alaney2k 467:alaney2k 437:alaney2k 418:Schmidt, 383:Schmidt, 366:redirect 318:alaney2k 234:Contribs 227:Armbrust 118:View log 564:JForget 276:Chelo61 199:Delete. 163:WP refs 151:scholar 91:protect 86:history 358:Delete 347:raseaC 341:Delete 214:Delete 195:WP:NFF 135:Google 95:delete 178:JSTOR 139:books 112:views 104:watch 100:links 48:. -- 16:< 606:talk 594:Keep 585:talk 577:Keep 513:talk 476:talk 458:Keep 446:talk 360:per 327:talk 296:? -- 280:talk 272:Keep 244:Note 220:and 171:FENS 145:news 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 56:talk 51:Cirt 46:keep 404:BUT 185:TWL 120:• 116:– ( 608:) 587:) 516:) 500:ʘ 479:) 463:ʘ 449:) 433:ʘ 330:) 314:ʘ 312:. 282:) 250:. 224:. 197:. 165:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 58:) 604:( 583:( 510:( 508:ʘ 473:( 471:ʘ 443:( 441:ʘ 324:( 322:ʘ 278:( 253:— 189:) 181:· 175:· 167:· 160:· 154:· 148:· 142:· 137:( 129:( 126:) 114:) 76:( 54:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Cirt
talk
04:24, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Godzilla (2012 film)
Godzilla (2012 film)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:NFF
13:32, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
notability criteria for films

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.