459:
I am pretty sure that staff writers from major technology news sources are reliable. They are going to be reliable whether or not the boss man has told the journalist to write a traditional news article or assigned the writer to create a 'blog' to exploit the power of web 2.0. Also, what are book
418:
says that "Some newspapers host interactive columns that they call blogs" and that these are reliable sources as long as "the writers are professionals and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control", qualifications which all of the articles I cited meet.
481:
Besides, all we need to cite from these articles is their author's opinion: the fact that authors for these notable publications felt that this was important software makes it notable. The relevant facts can be sourced from google's pages.
547:: I withdraw the nomination to delete, sources seem to establish notability. I think that the policies about the use of blogs to establish notability are due for a makeover, but this is not the place to discuss that.--
478:: the requirement is that the blog is written by an expert in the subject who has been published in a reliable source. Which the blog in question was. Note that the 2nd and 3rd articles are _not_ blogs.
414:
They are articles hosted on reputable websites written by staff writers, they are reliable sources, whether or not they are denoted as 'blogs' is irrelevant. While this is not a BLP,
129:
441:: "News reporting is distinct from opinion pieces. Opinion pieces are only reliable for statements as to the opinion of their authors, not for statements of fact". --
237:
285:
The lack of an assertion of notability, given the availability of sources that are so plainly tied to the topic, is grounds for a cleanup request, not deletion.
96:
91:
100:
511:
Anything up on google Labs is probably notable--certainly so if it's there for two years, and pcworld and computerworld and eWeek are RSs.
83:
343:
17:
396:
The sources you provides are blogs. If we have to resort to blogs to establish "notability," then there probably isn't any.--
367:
136:
Article about a discontinued
Firefox extension that makes no claim of notability and is unsourced. (prod was removed)--
556:
539:
522:
491:
469:
450:
428:
405:
389:
317:
297:
255:
227:
197:
163:
145:
65:
571:
36:
570:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
276:
87:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
304:
The majority of the sources are blogs and "how to install" instructions. Blogs and discussion boards are not
437:
or "interactive column" is "usually maintained by an individual with regular entries of commentary". From
250:
272:
It makes no difference that the extension was discontinued - Per WP:NOTE, notability is not temporary.
355:
173:
154:
as an unnotable
Firefox extension. There are a couple of sources, but nothing to prove notability.
79:
71:
207:
177:
465:
424:
385:
305:
59:
475:
220:
190:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
552:
535:
487:
446:
401:
313:
244:
141:
160:
438:
359:
49:
518:
461:
420:
415:
381:
53:
290:
279:
117:
548:
531:
483:
442:
397:
309:
137:
156:
513:
347:
460:
reviews if not opinion and yet we allow them in articles all the time.
370:
344:"Download This: Sync Firefox Bookmarks, Build Personal Podcasts".
564:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
434:
124:
113:
109:
105:
474:Blogs are acceptable sources in some cases. See
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
574:). No further edits should be made to this page.
356:"Google Develops Browser Sync Tool for Firefox".
238:list of Software-related deletion discussions
52:and withdrawn nomination. Non-admin closure.
8:
433:Again, blogs are not a reliable sources. A
368:"First Impressions of Google Browser Sync".
380:And the article is in pretty good shape.
366:Vaughan-Nichols, Steven (June 9, 2006).
236:: This debate has been included in the
7:
342:Blackwell, Laura (August 1, 2006).
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
275:The article is unsourced, but
172:: Doesn't show notability per
1:
557:06:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
540:20:51, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
523:14:54, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
492:20:54, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
470:05:58, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
451:05:36, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
429:05:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
406:05:04, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
390:04:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
354:Perez, Juan (June 08, 2006).
318:03:44, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
298:02:00, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
256:00:48, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
228:23:54, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
198:00:12, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
164:22:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
146:21:33, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
66:03:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
282:are available for the topic.
591:
567:Please do not modify it.
333:I found several sources,
32:Please do not modify it.
204:Vote changed to keep
80:Google Browser Sync
72:Google Browser Sync
48:per combination of
258:
241:
226:
196:
50:inclement weather
582:
569:
295:
253:
247:
242:
232:
223:
218:
216:
213:
210:
206:: per Icewedge.
193:
188:
186:
183:
180:
127:
121:
103:
62:
56:
44:The result was
34:
590:
589:
585:
584:
583:
581:
580:
579:
578:
572:deletion review
565:
291:
251:
245:
221:
214:
211:
208:
191:
184:
181:
178:
123:
94:
78:
75:
60:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
588:
586:
577:
576:
560:
559:
542:
530:Per Icewedge.
525:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
479:
472:
454:
453:
409:
408:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
364:
360:Computer World
352:
335:
334:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
288:
287:
286:
283:
273:
265:
264:
259:
230:
201:
166:
134:
133:
74:
69:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
587:
575:
573:
568:
562:
561:
558:
554:
550:
546:
543:
541:
537:
533:
529:
526:
524:
520:
516:
515:
510:
507:
506:
493:
489:
485:
480:
477:
473:
471:
467:
463:
458:
457:
456:
455:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
417:
413:
412:
411:
410:
407:
403:
399:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
387:
383:
379:
372:
369:
365:
362:
361:
357:
353:
350:
349:
345:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
332:
329:
328:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
296:
294:
289:
284:
281:
278:
274:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
263:
260:
257:
254:
248:
239:
235:
231:
229:
224:
217:
205:
202:
200:
199:
194:
187:
175:
174:WP:NOTABILITY
171:
167:
165:
162:
159:
158:
153:
150:
149:
148:
147:
143:
139:
131:
126:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
57:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
566:
563:
544:
527:
512:
508:
358:
346:
330:
292:
261:
233:
203:
169:
168:
155:
151:
135:
45:
43:
31:
28:
306:WP:reliable
246:Fabrictramp
476:WP:SELFPUB
252:talk to me
462:Icewedge
421:Icewedge
382:Icewedge
348:PC World
130:View log
55:MuZemike
439:WP:RELY
293:MrZaius
97:protect
92:history
549:Jmundo
532:JulesH
484:JulesH
443:Jmundo
416:WP:BLP
398:Jmundo
310:Jmundo
277:myriad
170:Delete
161:(talk)
152:Delete
138:Jmundo
125:delete
101:delete
371:eWEEK
308:. --
280:WP:RS
209:Schuy
179:Schuy
157:Tavix
128:) – (
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
553:talk
545:Note
536:talk
528:Keep
519:talk
509:Keep
488:talk
466:talk
447:talk
435:blog
425:talk
402:talk
386:talk
331:Keep
314:talk
262:Keep
234:Note
222:talk
192:talk
142:talk
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
61:talk
46:keep
514:DGG
243:--
240:.
555:)
538:)
521:)
490:)
468:)
449:)
427:)
404:)
388:)
316:)
249:|
176:.
144:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
551:(
534:(
517:(
486:(
464:(
445:(
423:(
400:(
384:(
373:.
363:.
351:.
312:(
225:)
219:(
215:1
212:m
195:)
189:(
185:1
182:m
140:(
132:)
122:(
120:)
82:(
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.