Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Gorgons and Medusa in popular culture - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

167:- It is absolutely proper to spin off long sections into a separate article. The fictional representations discussed here are certainly notable (though the page itself could use trimming) but not so much on the main article. Nominator sounds like he doesn't personally like "in popular culture articles," which is his preference, but NOT a reason to delete. These are created for a specific, encyclopedic purpose. Frankly, if you delete this, all you'll end up doing is seeing the main article fill up with nonsense and it'll be spun off into a new article again. Don't waste everyone's time. 342:
If "Gorgon" and "Medusa" are are notable in popular culture, then so are mentions of every greek mythology character in "popular culture". There should be an article for every time Zeus is mentioned in "popular culture". Every time Cyclops is mentioned. We dont need to note everytime a myth
333:. Your argument is that Medusa and Gorgon aren't in popular culture? That makes no sense. And there is no precedent that these types of articles be removed, as many, many ones have survived deletion votes or never got nominated in the first place. 284:
pending a cut-down and cleanup. Nothing wrong with a non-duplicating fork if its content is worthwhile, but this content stretches the definition laid down by the title. It needs to be trimmed down and better sourced.
407:
of loosely-associated topics. There is no notability asserted about the presence of Medusa and Gorgons in popular culture, and the criteria apparently ranges from song names to villainous presences in TV episodes.
129: 149:
article is already lengthy enough without this list added on at the end. Also, keeping a separate list reduces the number of pop culture fans who want to add every single instance of gorgons on the main,
363: 125: 429:
for the reason that Erik just listed above. There are thousands of articles that have ridiculously long trivia and popular culture sections without spinning them off into their own articles.
83: 78: 384: 87: 70: 110: 253:
So edit it, it's not a reason to delete it. There's nothing about the article title that means it can only be a directory, it's just that that's how it ended up.
262:
It is a reason to delete. It isn't a formatting problem. The article connects things that aren't connected. It's original research, as is everything that fails
179:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to itemize mentions of every mythical creature out there. Doing something like this is way too trivial and unmaintainable
449: 456: 433: 421: 394: 373: 347: 337: 316: 300: 270: 257: 244: 224: 211: 195: 183: 171: 158: 136: 52: 17: 191:
Extremely indiscriminate list of insignificant references, even a simple mention of the word "gorgon" is enough to be added here.
74: 66: 58: 471: 36: 417: 50: 470:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
293: 45: 207:'s character was named "Gorgon" is on here. In a shorter, less inclusive form this might have merit. 155: 133: 326: 313: 443: 288: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
192: 404: 263: 237: 330: 309: 430: 413: 208: 334: 267: 254: 241: 221: 168: 204: 104: 391: 370: 441:. Erik above said it very well. Ditch as an indiscriminate list of trivia. 403:
because this is clearly an indiscriminate list of trivia. Knowledge (XXG) is
344: 180: 409: 154:
article. I'd rather not see a huge list bog down a perfectly good article.
130:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Dr. Strangelove in popular culture
146: 220:
That's an argument to EDIT the article, not to DELETE the article.
126:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Smilodon in popular culture
464:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
117:
The trend with "in popular culture" topics, wittily captured by
312:
to show entry of Gorgons & Medusa into popular culture.
203:
As per Masruemoto. For instance, a Star Trek episode where
118: 100: 96: 92: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 236:This is a directory of loosely associated terms, 474:). No further edits should be made to this page. 121:, is over the top and is now heading downhill. 364:list of Fictional characters-related deletions 343:characater was mentioned in a tv show/movie. 8: 329:came out, and other mentions, has plenty of 385:list of Popular culture-related deletions 383:: This debate has been included in the 362:: This debate has been included in the 132:as well as several others just today. 67:Gorgons and Medusa in popular culture 59:Gorgons and Medusa in popular culture 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 308:per nom & ample precedent. No 24: 1: 491: 143:Keep or drastically reduce 245:20:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 212:16:41, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 196:02:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 184:00:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 172:00:42, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 159:00:36, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 137:23:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 119:this former embedded list 467:Please do not modify it. 457:18:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 434:19:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 422:15:30, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 395:14:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 374:14:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 348:03:49, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 338:23:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 317:22:50, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 301:15:09, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 271:03:00, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 258:23:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 225:23:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 53:20:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 44:The result was Delete -- 32:Please do not modify it. 325:What? The fact that 327:Clash of the Titans 455: 397: 388: 376: 367: 482: 469: 452: 447: 446: 389: 379: 368: 358: 331:reliable sources 296: 291: 108: 90: 47:Anthony.bradbury 34: 490: 489: 485: 484: 483: 481: 480: 479: 478: 472:deletion review 465: 450: 442: 405:not a directory 392:John Vandenberg 371:John Vandenberg 294: 289: 81: 65: 62: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 488: 486: 477: 476: 460: 459: 436: 424: 398: 377: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 320: 319: 314:Carlossuarez46 303: 282:Very weak keep 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 248: 247: 230: 229: 228: 227: 215: 214: 198: 186: 174: 162: 115: 114: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 487: 475: 473: 468: 462: 461: 458: 453: 445: 440: 437: 435: 432: 428: 425: 423: 419: 415: 411: 406: 402: 399: 396: 393: 386: 382: 378: 375: 372: 365: 361: 357: 356: 349: 346: 341: 340: 339: 336: 332: 328: 324: 323: 322: 321: 318: 315: 311: 307: 304: 302: 299: 298: 297: 292: 283: 280: 279: 272: 269: 265: 261: 260: 259: 256: 252: 251: 250: 249: 246: 243: 239: 235: 232: 231: 226: 223: 219: 218: 217: 216: 213: 210: 206: 202: 199: 197: 194: 190: 187: 185: 182: 178: 175: 173: 170: 166: 163: 160: 157: 153: 148: 144: 141: 140: 139: 138: 135: 131: 127: 122: 120: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 49: 48: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 466: 463: 438: 426: 400: 380: 359: 305: 287: 286: 281: 233: 205:Melvin Belli 200: 188: 176: 164: 152:encyclopedic 151: 142: 123: 116: 46: 43: 31: 28: 201:Weak Delete 193:Masaruemoto 165:Strong keep 156:24.14.198.8 264:WP:NOT#DIR 238:WP:NOT#DIR 134:Punkmorten 451:críticame 431:Trusilver 209:Mandsford 335:DreamGuy 268:Jay32183 255:DreamGuy 242:Jay32183 222:DreamGuy 169:DreamGuy 161:Chris G. 111:View log 418:contrib 84:protect 79:history 439:Delete 427:Delete 401:Delete 306:Delete 290:Adrian 234:Delete 189:Delete 177:Delete 147:gorgon 145:--the 88:delete 444:María 345:Corpx 310:WP:RS 295:M. H. 181:Corpx 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 420:) - 414:talk 410:Erik 381:Note 360:Note 124:See 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 390:-- 387:. 369:-- 366:. 109:– ( 416:• 266:. 240:. 128:, 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 454:) 448:( 412:( 408:— 113:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Anthony.bradbury

20:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Gorgons and Medusa in popular culture
Gorgons and Medusa in popular culture
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
this former embedded list
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Smilodon in popular culture
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Dr. Strangelove in popular culture
Punkmorten
23:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
gorgon
24.14.198.8
00:36, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
DreamGuy
00:42, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Corpx
00:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Masaruemoto

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.