498:
events in question, and, where there are suitable references, in the articles about any notable people involved or implicated. Mr
Gallagher himself was not a notable person, and he does not acquire notability through his death or because questions about his death are being directed at some notable person. Without wishing to seem callous, my point is that Mr Gallagher himself could have been replaced by another person: then that other person would have featured in the tragic events, their family would be asking questions, and the same basic questions would still be directed at the notable person mentioned. The context in which the killing took place is certainly notable, and we do indeed have coverage of that in Knowledge (XXG) (as we should). But an article on Mr Gallagher does not belong here, any more than we should have articles on the individual victims of
561:– Knowledge (XXG) is not a memorial and I cannot see from the article in its present form what criterion would elevate this particular tragedy above the 3,000-odd other deaths during the war. Fergananim, above, attempts to establish notability on the basis that the victim's parents "seek answers". As painful as their situation is, I do not recognise that their valid and poignant desire is sufficient reason to include this victim as an encyclopaedia entry. The project does not exist either to validate such deserving people nor to provide moral support for the victims of injustice. If their search for answers actually yielded any, perhaps such answers could change the narrative in a way that might carry an article such as this across the threshhold of notability, since murderers so rarely provide satisfaction.
457:. I'll repeat what I have already said in a similar debate: Whilst any death is tragic, and deaths due to natural disasters and conflicts, declared or undeclared, seem particularly so, it is our policy that the subjects of articles must be notable. For this reason we do not have articles on every soldier killed in a war, every victim of a pandemic, or everyone who died in a horrific disaster, though we will probably have articles on the war, pandemic or disaster in question. We do have articles about people who have died in such circumstances, but only where those people were already notable for other reasons. Although Mr Gallagher's death was a tragedy he himself was not notable. It is not our place to provide personal memorials.
436:
death is in any way notable. Do you contend that all victims of the
Troubles (over 3500 of them) are worthy of inclusion. If so, then we would have to add all the victims from Sudan, Congo, Ukraine, Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. If this is not the idea you want, what makes these examples different. Nothing does. They were sad tragic events that happened on an almost daily basis for thirty years.--
584:. I am extraordinarily unhappy with recent edits to this article, which consist largely of highly emotive quotations. These quotations do not in any way affect the informational content of the article, but seem to me to be calculated to produce an emotional response that will tend to bias contributions to this debate.
497:
I'm sorry, but this still doesn't make this particular person notable. We cannot have articles about people simply because questions are asked about their deaths, even if these questions are directed at current politicians. The correct place for covering such questions is in articles about the tragic
200:
Subject is one of over three and a half thousand victims of the
Northern Ireland ethnic violence from the late sixties till recently. While every death is a tragedy, few if any are notable for an encyclopedia. The contributing editor has created dozens of articles regarding individual victims, none
478:
notable, especially for the family's drive to seek answers from a still-current political figure who was in charge of the Derry IRA at the time. Of course we cannot list all such deaths, but we can at least list notable ones, if only to represent the others. However it is not, and was not, intended
435:
Sorry
Eastmain, but you still have not demonstrated why these particular deaths are notable for an encyclopedia. No-one disputes that the killings made the papers at the time. But so do traffic accidents, muggings, non-terrorism related killings, missing people, etc. This does not mean that the
201:
of them individually notable. I had speedied the three I am adding to AFD now, but that was rejected on the basis that they had "plenty of sources", but this is not the case. Some only had a few refs, and these tended to be news stories that do not confer notability.
516:
We also certainly can't mention some victims, to "represent the others": we are not in a position to decide who might or might not be chosen as representatives, and would be required to make invidious comparisons entirely outside the scope of this project.
405:. There would probably have been significant coverage at the time in British and Irish newspapers, but verifying this would probably require access to hard-copy or microfilm collections of newspapers. If anyone has access to the archives of
207:
The AFD for other similar articles have said there may be a possibility of a merge to other articles. While I disagree (due to the risk of "indiscriminate lists), I'll throw the suggestion out there for discussion.
169:
346:
538:
I have not a clue what makes this boy and his death notable. Secondly, it don't have the idea that the article is neutral enough. No idea why Martin McGuinness is featured here.
163:
122:
574:
374:
318:
603:
While one person out of so many becomes notable is hard to explain, but the sources are multiple, in depth, and involve analysis over time. He is notable
129:
52:. The strongest points are made in favor of deletion. As RomanSpa points out, victims of terrorist activities are not automatically notable
95:
90:
99:
626:. It's also worth noting that this and similar articles in any case are covered by established Knowledge (XXG) policy, as covered at
17:
82:
562:
184:
420:
388:
360:
332:
301:
266:
151:
664:
40:
612:
145:
287:
645:
616:
593:
551:
526:
511:
488:
466:
445:
426:
394:
366:
338:
307:
274:
217:
64:
141:
86:
660:
608:
191:
36:
78:
70:
545:
484:
59:
177:
631:
627:
641:
589:
522:
507:
462:
416:
384:
356:
328:
297:
233:
226:. The killing is notable and adequately documented, even if the person is not otherwise notable.
409:
or other newspapers that hide their archives behin a paywall, perhaps they could check there.
157:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
659:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
570:
604:
540:
480:
53:
441:
262:
213:
637:
585:
518:
503:
458:
412:
380:
352:
324:
293:
229:
116:
437:
406:
258:
209:
653:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
499:
204:(Note that some of these articles have already been speedied.)
563:
257:. Can you advise WHY you think the killing was notable.--
112:
108:
104:
541:
176:
474:. I would suggest that the killing and its aftermath
347:
list of
Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions
190:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
667:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
373:Note: This debate has been included in the
345:Note: This debate has been included in the
317:Note: This debate has been included in the
375:list of People-related deletion discussions
372:
344:
319:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
316:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
633:Not Notable per existing policy
1:
410:
378:
350:
322:
291:
253:
250:
247:
244:
241:
227:
630:; victims of terrorism are
582:Note following recent edits
288:Killing of Gordan Gallagher
684:
265:) 20:43, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
656:Please do not modify it.
646:13:30, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
617:06:57, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
594:06:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
575:06:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
552:22:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
527:10:08, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
512:10:04, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
489:09:37, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
479:as a personal memorial.
467:07:48, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
446:04:17, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
427:02:14, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
395:17:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
367:17:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
339:17:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
308:17:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
275:16:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
218:22:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
65:03:19, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
48:The result was
397:
369:
341:
675:
658:
609:I am One of Many
567:
550:
543:
425:
393:
365:
337:
306:
272:
251:
248:
245:
242:
238:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
79:Gordan Gallagher
71:Gordan Gallagher
62:
56:
34:
683:
682:
678:
677:
676:
674:
673:
672:
671:
665:deletion review
654:
539:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
60:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
681:
679:
670:
669:
649:
648:
620:
619:
597:
596:
578:
577:
555:
554:
532:
531:
530:
529:
514:
492:
491:
469:
451:
450:
449:
448:
430:
429:
399:
398:
370:
342:
313:
312:
311:
310:
281:
280:
279:
278:
240:
239:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
680:
668:
666:
662:
657:
651:
650:
647:
643:
639:
635:
634:
629:
625:
622:
621:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
599:
598:
595:
591:
587:
583:
580:
579:
576:
572:
568:
566:
560:
557:
556:
553:
549:
548:
544:
537:
534:
533:
528:
524:
520:
515:
513:
509:
505:
501:
496:
495:
494:
493:
490:
486:
482:
477:
473:
470:
468:
464:
460:
456:
453:
452:
447:
443:
439:
434:
433:
432:
431:
428:
424:
422:
418:
414:
408:
404:
401:
400:
396:
392:
390:
386:
382:
376:
371:
368:
364:
362:
358:
354:
348:
343:
340:
336:
334:
330:
326:
320:
315:
314:
309:
305:
303:
299:
295:
289:
285:
284:
283:
282:
277:
276:
271:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
249:
246:
243:
237:
235:
231:
225:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
205:
202:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
655:
652:
632:
623:
600:
581:
564:
558:
546:
535:
475:
471:
454:
411:
402:
379:
351:
323:
292:
273:
270:
254:
228:
223:
206:
203:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
49:
47:
31:
28:
164:free images
542:The Banner
481:Fergananim
55:Guerillero
661:talk page
628:WP:VICTIM
407:The Times
37:talk page
663:or in a
638:RomanSpa
586:RomanSpa
519:RomanSpa
504:RomanSpa
459:RomanSpa
421:contribs
413:Eastmain
389:contribs
381:Eastmain
361:contribs
353:Eastmain
333:contribs
325:Eastmain
302:contribs
294:Eastmain
286:Move to
267:contribs
230:Eastmain
123:View log
39:or in a
624:Comment
565:— O'Dea
403:Comment
255:Comment
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
61:My Talk
605:WP:GNG
559:Delete
536:Delete
455:Delete
142:Google
100:delete
50:delete
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
642:talk
613:talk
601:Keep
590:talk
571:talk
547:talk
523:talk
508:talk
500:9/11
485:talk
472:Keep
463:talk
442:talk
438:Dmol
417:talk
385:talk
357:talk
329:talk
298:talk
263:talk
259:Dmol
234:talk
224:Keep
214:talk
210:Dmol
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
192:TWL
121:– (
644:)
636:.
615:)
592:)
573:)
525:)
510:)
502:.
487:)
476:is
465:)
444:)
419:•
387:•
377:.
359:•
349:.
331:•
321:.
300:•
290:?
236:•
216:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
58:|
640:(
611:(
607:.
588:(
569:(
521:(
506:(
483:(
461:(
440:(
423:)
415:(
391:)
383:(
363:)
355:(
335:)
327:(
304:)
296:(
269:)
261:(
232:(
212:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.