206:
The magazine stopped appearing on newsstands several months ago; there's been no official announcement of its demise, and no news coverage either. Certainly a magazine selling over 200,000 copies per month would create some stir with its disappearance -- however, this circulation figure is certainly
366:
364:
355:
353:
349:
230:
If a neutral party can be found who considers the magazine noteworthy enough to merit a properly-sourced, neutral pov article, and this party is willing to put in the sweat -- great. But opinion of the magazine is generally very low, I doubt such a party will be found.
351:
202:
I am proposing the article's deletion because it's pretty clearly a vanity creation by the editor and publisher, Brynn
Hammond. Hammond's imdb biography was written by one of his employees, and something similar seems to have happened here.
357:
210:
Most telling of all, the official
Gorezone Facebook pages (there's a couple of them) have only a couple of hundred members -- how could this be for a 200,000+ circulation magazine that only recently ceased publication?
156:
301:
150:
323:
117:
215:
All of this supports my long-held feeling that the article was created by publisher
Hammond as a form of advertising, and therefore qualifies for deletion.
90:
85:
94:
187:
lack of notability, article largely unreferenced, circulation figures false, likely a vanity page by the publisher or his surrogates
77:
171:
17:
138:
132:
392:
36:
391:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
377:
337:
315:
290:
261:
240:
224:
196:
59:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
128:
81:
178:
335:
313:
286:
73:
65:
363:, so it can't be the same. There are couple of references out there that do refer to this magazine
252:: subject's notability not established, article lacks citations from reliable sources, lacks npov.
207:
a lie that originated with the publisher, elsewise it's unlikely it would have ceased publication.
164:
144:
373:
257:
236:
220:
192:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
330:
308:
282:
271:
55:
369:
253:
232:
216:
188:
111:
359:, but then I noticed that the magazine from the article was first published in
274:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
50:
385:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107:
103:
99:
163:
302:
list of
Popular culture-related deletion discussions
348:. I was about to argue to keep this based on these
281:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
395:). No further edits should be made to this page.
324:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
177:
8:
322:Note: This debate has been included in the
300:Note: This debate has been included in the
368:, but not enough to establish notability -
321:
299:
245:Nobody has anything to say? I'll start:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
412:
262:03:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
241:02:30, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
225:16:44, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
197:01:56, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
388:Please do not modify it.
378:19:55, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
338:19:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
316:19:02, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
291:01:13, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
60:01:39, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
340:
327:
318:
305:
293:
74:Gorezone magazine
66:Gorezone magazine
403:
390:
328:
306:
280:
276:
182:
181:
167:
115:
97:
34:
411:
410:
406:
405:
404:
402:
401:
400:
399:
393:deletion review
386:
269:
124:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
409:
407:
398:
397:
381:
380:
342:
341:
319:
296:
295:
294:
278:
277:
266:
265:
264:
228:
227:
201:
185:
184:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
408:
396:
394:
389:
383:
382:
379:
375:
371:
367:
365:
362:
358:
356:
354:
352:
350:
347:
344:
343:
339:
336:
334:
333:
325:
320:
317:
314:
312:
311:
303:
298:
297:
292:
288:
284:
279:
275:
273:
268:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
248:
247:
246:
243:
242:
238:
234:
226:
222:
218:
214:
213:
212:
208:
204:
199:
198:
194:
190:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
130:
127:
126:Find sources:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
387:
384:
360:
345:
332:I, Jethrobot
331:
310:I, Jethrobot
309:
270:
249:
244:
229:
209:
205:
200:
186:
174:
168:
160:
153:
147:
141:
135:
125:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
283:Ron Ritzman
151:free images
272:Relisted
118:View log
370:frankie
254:Bustter
233:Bustter
217:Bustter
189:Bustter
157:WP refs
145:scholar
91:protect
86:history
346:Delete
250:Delete
129:Google
95:delete
46:delete
172:JSTOR
133:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
374:talk
361:2005
287:talk
258:talk
237:talk
221:talk
193:talk
165:FENS
139:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
48:. —
179:TWL
116:– (
376:)
329:—
326:.
307:—
304:.
289:)
260:)
239:)
223:)
195:)
159:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
372:(
285:(
256:(
235:(
219:(
191:(
183:)
175:·
169:·
161:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
136:·
131:(
123:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.