273:- Just looking at the "review and previews". The Linux Game Tome content is submitted by the game's developer, with user-generated comments, so is unusable. Warcry.com content is limited to previews, nothing substantial. GameHippo looks about as unreliable as they come. However, the Home of the Underdogs review is staff written
294:
I disagree with you about the
Underdogs. This isn't a reviewed or reliable site, it's basically a fansite that got big. Either way though, the game is just one of the many files up for download on the site, not really a review or significant coverage. The PC Gamer is trivial to the extreme.
466:
I found one page on current Google News that says "A couple years ago, Jonathan Mak made a game called
Everyday Shooter for PS3 and PC. Prior to that, he worked on a lesser known, multiplayer, action-rts game called Gate
175:
329:
Reliability for sources is not directly related to that source's notability or significance. It has to do with being reviewed, fact-checked, and perceived as reputable. Underdogs is first and foremost an
209:
This is the only reliable source and isn't even significant coverage. Last AFD mentioned a press page on the game's website which has a number of unreliable trivial mentions, none of which are suitable.
470:
Definitely a trivial mention. Searching the whole archive I can find one or two more mentions of Mr. Mak that mention Gate 88 in passing. Number of reliable sources is the metric, not number of hits.
82:
136:
169:
238:
206:
Tagged for notability since April '08. One source, which is a highly trivial mention in PC Gamer UK, a tiny sidebar in the downloadable content section.
77:
17:
48:. Listed for 12 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to determine consensus. (
496:: Whilst I'm currently still accepting HoTU as a source, it's still only one item of significant coverage - and I usually go with
49:
513:
481:
461:
435:
400:
363:
345:
324:
306:
289:
263:
227:
61:
528:
36:
190:
109:
104:
157:
113:
468:
276:; this is a site I don't mind citing as a source. Combined with the brief PC Gamer coverage, this might just pass
527:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
96:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
493:
151:
509:
459:
359:
320:
285:
57:
147:
183:
419:
477:
396:
341:
302:
259:
248:
223:
501:
312:
197:
311:
HoTU is significant enough to have received positive attention from other major publications,
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
505:
447:
355:
316:
281:
53:
446:
large amount of gnews hits, and coverage in publications such as pc gamer prove notability
207:
213:
497:
277:
472:
391:
336:
297:
274:
254:
243:
218:
163:
428:
100:
130:
331:
210:
334:
repository and the text on the site is not known to be reliable as a source.
504:, so depending on what happens there I may review my opinion in the future.
212:
In the end there is no way this topic is significant enough to find enough
92:
67:
422:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
521:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
315:
for example. What is it that you look for in a reliable source?
389:
1 reliable and 1 unreliable/borderline source is not a keep.
126:
122:
118:
182:
427:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
196:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
531:). No further edits should be made to this page.
239:list of video game related deletion discussions
83:Articles for deletion/Gate 88 (2nd nomination)
8:
500:. I've opened up a discussion about HoTU at
237:: This debate has been included in the
216:to meet Knowledge (XXG)'s requirements.
75:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
74:
24:
251:) 20:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
1:
498:Knowledge (XXG):N#cite_note-3
350:Well, hey, that's why it's a
78:Articles for deletion/Gate 88
514:14:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
482:19:44, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
462:12:30, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
436:23:01, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
401:19:47, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
364:11:49, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
346:23:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
325:09:32, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
307:22:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
290:22:42, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
264:20:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
228:20:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
62:23:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
548:
524:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
494:List of freeware games
73:AfDs for this article:
488:Changing my !vote to
44:The result was
438:
252:
50:non-admin closure
539:
526:
457:
456:
433:
426:
424:
233:
201:
200:
186:
134:
116:
34:
547:
546:
542:
541:
540:
538:
537:
536:
535:
529:deletion review
522:
452:
448:
429:
417:
143:
107:
91:
88:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
545:
543:
534:
533:
517:
516:
486:
485:
484:
440:
439:
425:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
266:
204:
203:
140:
87:
86:
85:
80:
72:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
544:
532:
530:
525:
519:
518:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
474:
469:
465:
464:
463:
460:
458:
455:
451:
445:
442:
441:
437:
434:
432:
423:
421:
416:
415:
402:
398:
394:
393:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
348:
347:
343:
339:
338:
333:
328:
327:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
309:
308:
304:
300:
299:
293:
292:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
271:
267:
265:
261:
257:
256:
250:
246:
245:
240:
236:
232:
231:
230:
229:
225:
221:
220:
215:
211:
208:
199:
195:
192:
189:
185:
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
149:
146:
145:Find sources:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
523:
520:
489:
471:
453:
449:
443:
430:
418:
390:
351:
335:
296:
269:
268:
253:
242:
234:
217:
205:
193:
187:
179:
172:
166:
160:
154:
144:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
506:Marasmusine
356:Marasmusine
354:keep :: -->
332:abandonware
317:Marasmusine
282:Marasmusine
170:free images
54:Ron Ritzman
270:Weak keep
502:WP:VG/RS
490:Redirect
420:Relisted
137:View log
431:JForget
176:WP refs
164:scholar
110:protect
105:history
93:Gate 88
68:Gate 88
454:Magnus
148:Google
114:delete
473:Andre
450:Ultra
392:Andre
337:Andre
313:Wired
298:Andre
255:Andre
244:Andre
219:Andre
214:WP:RS
191:JSTOR
152:books
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
510:talk
478:talk
467:88."
444:Keep
397:talk
360:talk
352:weak
342:talk
321:talk
303:talk
286:talk
278:WP:N
260:talk
249:talk
235:Note
224:talk
184:FENS
158:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
58:talk
492:to
198:TWL
135:– (
512:)
480:)
399:)
362:)
344:)
323:)
305:)
288:)
280:.
262:)
241:.
226:)
178:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
60:)
52:)
508:(
476:(
395:(
358:(
340:(
319:(
301:(
284:(
258:(
247:(
222:(
202:)
194:·
188:·
180:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
150:(
142:(
139:)
133:)
95:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.