296:
there in an attempt to make the article look substantial. Personally, I am not a fan of the group or their style of music and do not care if the statements are true or false. I am just trying to preserve the integrity of the article. If you can show me one valid verifiable reference then I would consider supporting adding this to the main article. --
395:. As soon as his block was up he resumed vandalizing this page, as well as vandalizing the talkpages and userpages of his largest detractors. I have notified the original admin that blocked him, and hope the administrators will do what's needed. As for the nominated article, let's end this farce and move on to more worthy things.--
295:
If it is that noteworthy then please provide at least one source to back up this claim. The text makes a reference to an interview in a magazine. I have not found any source of the existance of the magazine. The article lists four references which do not have any relevant information and are only
266:
should probably be deleted, but its content merged with the main article. I think it's a biased attempt by fans of ICP to keep this information out of the main article, and that the creator of this article was taking a valid stand by creating it if ICP fans are putting their own POV in the article.
282:
It's completely unsourced and unencyclopedic. I don't see it as a valid stand at all. It was removed from the ICP article several times because it's utter nonsense with nothing to back it up, and then it was put back up as its own article with "sources" that aren't even articles. The remainder of
265:
I wouldn't say speedy delete. I disagee that this material is NN--I think it is notable, and not designed to bias the subject any more than it would be to say that
Charles Nelson Reilly is gay. That said, I do believe that the structural bias in the article title is unacceptable, so this article
423:
407:. I know zip about any vandalism or sock-puppetage (?) but second all the other comments about NPOV, lack of notability, etc. Plus it doesn't tell you what the heck "Gay ICP" even is (I had to go to the AfD discussino page to find out it was Insane Clown Posse).
342:
against. The only defender is an anonymous IP who left a comment not a vote, and the author of the article didn't vote but rather saw fit to vandalize everyone else's votes to sway the discussion. Yeah, I think
128:, This text has vandalized the main page many times. The references listed do not point to anything at all relevant to the text. If the author can not come up with some reputable source then it is pure garbage.
363:
While interesting, it is so POV that it is impossible to know whether it is true or not. It might be worth briefly mentioning it in the main ICP article, but otherwise, get rid of it.--
283:
claims are rife with weasel words like "many rumors." I'm not sure on what grounds you can defend this article, or a merge into the main ICP article.--
52:
461:
440:
49:
17:
116:, this passage was repeatedly used to vandalize the main article, and only created after the main article was semiprotected.--
316:(A7-attack pages comes close but not quite), but I certainly wouldn't have a problem if an admin closed it early under
388:
493:
36:
492:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
267:
321:
207:
476:
451:
434:
411:
399:
379:
367:
351:
326:
300:
287:
270:
257:
239:
230:
210:
198:
171:
152:
132:
120:
108:
88:
75:
68:
472:. The imposter is now permanently blocked and I've tagged the new article for speedy deletion.
297:
236:
129:
347:
applies. Unless things change radically very soon, we should be able to put this one to bed.--
161:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
444:
430:. I'm taking this to ANI, we clearly have more than just a miffed POV pusher on our hands.
97:
58:
396:
348:
284:
117:
443:
was created and speedied three times so I have made it into a protected redirect. Possibly
473:
364:
424:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/The
Controversy Surrounding ICP's Stance on Homosexuality
392:
344:
317:
223:
219:
145:
101:
448:
408:
313:
67:
Material is not notable, and appears to be a POV push against the subject, the band
469:
465:
431:
376:
254:
227:
149:
105:
85:
72:
249:
I'm seeing very strong support here; does anyone agree this is a case for a
140:. Any claims on sexual preferences of the band belong on the band article (
312:
per all the lovely comments above. I don't think it's speedyible under
486:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
141:
320:
given the vandalism that has occurred in this discussion. --
462:
441:
The
Controversy Surrounding ICP's Stance on Homosexuality
71:. Structural bias in article title, "Gay ICP", as well.
216:
422:
Apparently, YaR GnitS hasn't had enough fun yet. See
468:, who set up his user and talk pages to redirect to
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
447:will also need protection when it is deleted. --
496:). No further edits should be made to this page.
148:has only contributed vandal edits to articles.
8:
226:has been reported to an administrator.
7:
222:rewrote Koosh's vote fraudulently.
338:Nine for, and nobody has actually
84:, of course; I am the nominator.
24:
100:seems to be the sole creation of
235:Not lately. Thanks Kasreyn. --
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
50:Can't sleep, clown will eat me
1:
181:
206:Been hearing voices, Koosh?
96:on further inquiry, article
513:
477:03:02, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
452:06:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
435:06:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
412:03:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
400:22:21, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
380:06:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
368:05:02, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
352:17:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
327:01:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
301:23:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
288:23:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
271:22:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
258:22:06, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
240:22:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
231:22:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
211:20:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
199:19:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
172:19:57, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
153:18:31, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
133:12:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
121:11:06, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
109:08:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
89:08:16, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
76:08:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
53:07:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
489:Please do not modify it.
460:And the latest attempt,
32:Please do not modify it.
69:Insane Clown Posse
389:assume good faith
387:We can no longer
215:Note this diff:
504:
491:
218:As you can see,
197:
195:
194:
193:
184:
183:
169:
164:
34:
512:
511:
507:
506:
505:
503:
502:
501:
500:
494:deletion review
487:
420:
191:
189:
187:
185:
180:
165:
162:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
510:
508:
499:
498:
482:
481:
480:
479:
455:
454:
419:
416:
415:
414:
402:
393:User:YaR_GnitS
382:
370:
357:
356:
355:
354:
330:
329:
306:
305:
304:
303:
290:
274:
273:
268:206.223.242.88
260:
244:
243:
242:
233:
224:User:YaR_GnitS
220:User:YaR_GnitS
201:
174:
155:
135:
123:
111:
102:User:YaR GnitS
91:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
509:
497:
495:
490:
484:
483:
478:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
458:
457:
456:
453:
450:
446:
442:
439:
438:
437:
436:
433:
429:
428:heaves a sigh
425:
417:
413:
410:
406:
403:
401:
398:
394:
390:
386:
383:
381:
378:
374:
371:
369:
366:
362:
359:
358:
353:
350:
346:
341:
337:
334:
333:
332:
331:
328:
325:
324:
319:
315:
311:
308:
307:
302:
299:
294:
291:
289:
286:
281:
278:
277:
276:
275:
272:
269:
264:
261:
259:
256:
252:
251:speedy delete
248:
245:
241:
238:
234:
232:
229:
225:
221:
217:
214:
213:
212:
209:
205:
202:
200:
196:
178:
175:
173:
170:
168:
159:
156:
154:
151:
147:
143:
139:
136:
134:
131:
127:
124:
122:
119:
115:
112:
110:
107:
103:
99:
95:
92:
90:
87:
83:
80:
79:
78:
77:
74:
70:
66:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
46:speedy delete
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
488:
485:
470:User:Kasreyn
466:User:Kaseryn
427:
421:
404:
384:
372:
360:
339:
335:
322:
309:
292:
279:
262:
250:
246:
208:69.86.199.51
203:
186:
176:
166:
157:
137:
125:
113:
93:
81:
64:
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
418:Note to all
397:Rosicrucian
349:Rosicrucian
285:Rosicrucian
118:Rosicrucian
474:NawlinWiki
375:per nom.
365:Wakefencer
179:as above.
160:per nom.
146:YaR GnitS
449:RHaworth
409:Bookgrrl
445:Gay ICP
432:Kasreyn
385:Comment
377:Postdlf
345:WP:SNOW
336:Comment
318:WP:SNOW
293:Comment
280:Comment
263:Comment
255:Kasreyn
247:Comment
228:Kasreyn
204:Comment
167:kantari
150:Sfacets
106:Kasreyn
98:Gay ICP
94:Comment
86:Kasreyn
73:Kasreyn
65:NN, POV
59:Gay ICP
405:Delete
373:Delete
361:Delete
314:WP:CSD
310:Delete
177:Delete
158:Delete
138:delete
126:Delete
114:Delete
82:Delete
464:, by
340:voted
323:NORTH
298:Koosh
237:Koosh
163:Nacon
130:Koosh
16:<
391:for
182:(|--
426:.
253:?
192:MuS
188:UlT
144:).
142:ICP
104:.
48:.
190:i
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.