294:(despite splitting its traffic between forums.gaming-age.com and a handful of alternate domains). For the number-addicted, it has nearly 2 million posts (this despite automated deletion of stale threads after a certain time), and nearly 8000 registered users (despite requiring administrator approval to register an account). This is emphatically not a vanity advertisement listing; this is a peer of the IGN and Gamespot boards in traffic and influence. -
52:
has comprehensively rewritten the article and persuaded at least one former deleter to be a keeper. In this case, I'm not sure there is a consensus given the new information in the article, and I think that VfU would be likely to undelete+relist this. A renomination may be appropriate for the sake of
402:
revisions. To highlight some reasons why the GAF should have a Wiki article. Many game developers and major game media names visit the site. The forums are very active with around 1000 users online during weekdays and GAF is still growing. 2 million + posts have been achieved in less than a year and
128:
I don't know if it should be deleted, but do please review the edit history and the continual vandalism of this page when thinking about it. I've never been to GAF and, based on how they describe themselves, will never go there, but I'm spending a few minutes every week rolling back nonsense or
286:. I'm gonna take a crack a rewriting this, but this is a significant gaming forum, particularly as a barameter of gaming culture in general. I'm also not sure why the nominator said it ranks low on BigBoards and Alexa; it's
317:
I've edited the page to be a little less vain and in-jokey, including a mention of notable posters (people who are notable as something other than GAF posters, not a "OMG KEWL POSTERS" list). -
254:
Because the site doesn't much matter. The forums aren't an adjunct to Gaming-Age; they are independently administrated, and largely more popular than the GA site. Alexa backs this up:
245:
website doesn't have an article, so why should its forum be considered more important? Also, a side note: Google gives 635,000 hits for "Gaming Age" but only displays 28 of them. --
367:
330:
307:
271:
151:
17:
422:
225:
36:
291:
255:
48:. Discounting Duderon (total of 2 edits), I would normally pretty much rely on an 8d-3k to be a delete. However,
421:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
407:
390:
372:
363:
349:
335:
326:
312:
303:
276:
267:
249:
227:
210:
198:
174:
156:
147:
133:
118:
105:
91:
59:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a
403:
a half, since NeoGAF's incarnation, and the forums contain a wealth of information for the average user.
246:
138:
Vandalizing this page is one of the favorite hobbies of the posters of a rival forum, unfortunately. -
65:
399:
383:
355:
318:
295:
259:
218:
139:
49:
223:
242:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
256:
87% of the gaming-age.com domain's hits are to forum.gaming-age.com or forums.gaming-age.com
76:
346:
207:
183:
115:
102:
404:
287:
171:
354:
As far as I can tell, being annoyed at trolls isn't a criterion for deletion. -
54:
387:
130:
72:
167:
84:
88:
71:
Non notable website, vanity piece. Both forum and main site rank low on
415:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
345:. This Opa Ages/Gaming Age blather has gone on long enough. -
39:
nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
386:
revisions, I think it is a good article, worth keeping. --
80:
241:, non-notable forum on a non-notable website. The
425:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
7:
288:ranked #24 in traffic on BigBoards
87:which are arguably more relevant.
24:
79:respectively, considerably below
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
336:10:22, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
313:07:40, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
277:07:40, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
250:05:14, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
228:22:04, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
211:19:46, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
199:17:18, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
175:16:43, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
157:07:40, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
134:16:34, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
106:12:26, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
92:11:50, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
1:
292:rank of about 12,500 on Alexa
170:forum. Doesn't seem special.
44:The result of the debate was
235:It is not important Opa-ages
129:vandalism from this page. --
408:20:11, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
391:13:00, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
373:06:11, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
350:05:55, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
119:15:09, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
60:00:06, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
442:
290:, and has a fairly decent
418:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
85:Gamefaqs message boards
37:Votes for Undeletion
423:undeletion request
398:I also agree with
81:IGN Message Boards
371:
334:
311:
275:
184:Andrew Lenahan -
155:
66:Gaming Age Forums
58:
433:
420:
400:A Man In Black's
384:A Man In Black's
361:
359:
324:
322:
301:
299:
265:
263:
221:
196:
193:
190:
187:
166:Just an average
145:
143:
57:
34:
441:
440:
436:
435:
434:
432:
431:
430:
429:
416:
357:
320:
297:
261:
219:
194:
191:
188:
185:
141:
101:per nominator.
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
439:
437:
428:
427:
411:
410:
393:
377:
376:
375:
340:
339:
338:
281:
280:
279:
247:Idont Havaname
236:
230:
213:
201:
177:
161:
160:
159:
123:
122:
121:
114:the re-write.
68:
63:
50:A Man In Black
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
438:
426:
424:
419:
413:
412:
409:
406:
401:
397:
394:
392:
389:
385:
381:
378:
374:
369:
365:
360:
353:
352:
351:
348:
344:
341:
337:
332:
328:
323:
316:
315:
314:
309:
305:
300:
293:
289:
285:
282:
278:
273:
269:
264:
257:
253:
252:
251:
248:
244:
240:
237:
234:
231:
229:
226:
224:
222:
217:
214:
212:
209:
205:
202:
200:
197:
181:
178:
176:
173:
169:
165:
162:
158:
153:
149:
144:
137:
136:
135:
132:
127:
124:
120:
117:
113:
110:
109:
108:
107:
104:
100:
96:
95:
94:
93:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
67:
64:
62:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
417:
414:
395:
379:
342:
283:
238:
232:
215:
203:
179:
163:
125:
111:
98:
97:
70:
46:NO CONSENSUS
45:
43:
31:
28:
284:Strong keep
243:Gaming Age
208:Dottore So
182:NN forum.
73:big-boards
53:clarity. -
356:A Man In
347:Lucky 6.9
319:A Man In
296:A Man In
260:A Man In
168:VBulletin
140:A Man In
368:Contribs
331:Contribs
308:Contribs
272:Contribs
220:Jwissick
152:Contribs
405:Duderon
172:Kushboy
126:Comment
343:Delete
239:Delete
233:Delete
216:Delete
204:Delete
180:Delete
164:Delete
99:Delete
55:Splash
388:Habap
382:With
358:Black
321:Black
298:Black
262:Black
142:Black
131:Habap
77:Alexa
16:<
396:Keep
380:Keep
364:Talk
327:Talk
304:Talk
268:Talk
258:. -
206:nn.
148:Talk
112:Keep
83:and
75:and
192:bli
89:Stx
366:|
329:|
306:|
270:|
195:nd
189:ar
186:St
150:|
116:Al
103:Al
370:)
362:(
333:)
325:(
310:)
302:(
274:)
266:(
154:)
146:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.