Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Gang Garrison 2 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source ๐Ÿ“

229:
piece from 1up and there's a reception section with multiple commentators as well as a decent amount of coverage which confers notability IMO. The 1up source was posted 4 days after the article was created, having found it I've gone from wavering to convinced, so slap my thigh and call me Betty.
170:: The Kotaku entry, at least, counts as a notable and reliable source. It could also have other sources that need to be found. It's also a very small game, so you can't expect as many sources as a commercial one.-- 211:
Big Download is part of AOL and is geared towards games of this type, so the significant coverage from them is good. Slide in John Bardinelli's "A surprisingly faithful demake of Team Fortress 2"
192:. Small games don't require fewer sources because they're smaller - if they don't have enough non-trivial coverage in multiple reliable sources, they aren't notable and don't need articles. - 271:
Thank you for sourcing, and yes, not only do those sources mention the game, but they do it in context of the contest, making the supposedly "non-notable competition" notable after all.--
123: 222:'s "GG 2.0 has more of everything โ€“ more options, more maps, more communication, and more explosions. Talking about it makes me want to go play another few rounds." 154: 57: 90: 85: 346: 342: 94: 17: 77: 130:
Non-notable video game. Blog entries, even entries on notable blogs, are not enough to qualify for general notability under
365: 36: 250: 257: 234: 364:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
246: 327: 309: 284: 260: 237: 201: 183: 161: 143: 59: 338: 323: 52: 226: 254: 231: 81: 294:, the sources given are well done and trustworthy. Thus, making it notable enough for inclusion. 223: 212: 197: 158: 139: 334: 319: 302: 278: 177: 49: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
73: 65: 189: 131: 193: 135: 297: 274: 215: 173: 111: 219: 134:. Entry into a non-notable competition does not qualify for notability. 358:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
118: 107: 103: 99: 188:
What? I expect this game, like any other, to satisfy
249:on PC World, not insignificant reception info on 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 368:). No further edits should be made to this page. 155:list of video game related deletion discussions 8: 153:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 190:the general notability guideline 1: 385: 328:13:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 310:00:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 285:23:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 261:22:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 238:22:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 202:22:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 184:20:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 162:22:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 144:20:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 60:00:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 361:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 347:few or no other edits 349:outside this topic. 44:The result was 350: 282: 181: 164: 376: 363: 332: 307: 305: 300: 273: 172: 149: 121: 115: 97: 34: 384: 383: 379: 378: 377: 375: 374: 373: 372: 366:deletion review 359: 303: 298: 296: 283: 182: 117: 88: 74:Gang Garrison 2 72: 69: 66:Gang Garrison 2 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 382: 380: 371: 370: 354: 353: 352: 351: 312: 289: 288: 287: 272: 266: 265: 264: 263: 241: 240: 206: 205: 204: 171: 165: 128: 127: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 381: 369: 367: 362: 356: 355: 348: 344: 340: 336: 331: 330: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 311: 308: 306: 301: 293: 290: 286: 280: 276: 270: 269: 268: 267: 262: 259: 256: 252: 248: 245: 244: 243: 242: 239: 236: 233: 228: 224: 221: 217: 213: 210: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 186: 185: 179: 175: 169: 166: 163: 160: 156: 152: 148: 147: 146: 145: 141: 137: 133: 125: 120: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 58: 56: 53: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 360: 357: 335:Bananaclasic 320:Bananaclasic 315: 295: 291: 216:Jay is Games 208: 167: 150: 129: 54: 50:Juliancolton 45: 43: 31: 28: 345:) has made 292:Strong Keep 251:Games Radar 343:contribs 220:Derek Yu 194:Chardish 159:MuZemike 136:Chardish 124:View log 299:Marlith 275:ZXCVBNM 258:another 255:Someone 247:Mention 235:another 232:Someone 174:ZXCVBNM 91:protect 86:history 304:(Talk) 218:) and 119:delete 95:delete 122:) โ€“ ( 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 339:talk 324:talk 316:Keep 279:TALK 227:this 225:and 209:Keep 198:talk 178:TALK 168:Keep 151:Note 140:talk 132:WP:N 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 46:keep 48:. โ€“ 341:โ€ข 333:โ€” 326:) 318:" 253:. 200:) 157:. 142:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 337:( 322:( 314:" 281:) 277:( 214:( 196:( 180:) 176:( 138:( 126:) 116:( 114:) 76:( 55:ยท

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Juliancolton


00:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Gang Garrison 2
Gang Garrison 2
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
WP:N
Chardish
talk
20:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
list of video game related deletion discussions
MuZemike
22:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
ZXCVBNM
TALK
20:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
the general notability guideline

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘