378:. I have access to the tourism article mentioned by II, but that only mentions this site in passing. DGG arguments are compelling, but I am mitigated I guess because I registered on the site myself months ago and then never really used it because it was just too much work (for instance, in contrast to other sites you cannot import articles from, e.g., PubMed, so you have to input all your publications by hand). Perhaps this will change (or even has already changed, I just never went back).... --
262:
398:
nor have I used it, though I know about it. But there are quite a number of things I could have used but don't--that does not make them any the less notable. I use some rather odd things, too, and it doesn't make them notable either.
220:
from the
Chronicle of HE blog, but its just a member posting, and isn't a RS, and what it says is not indicative of notability. know something about it? 2/ recommended,not just listed, at the Vanderbilt Univ Library Site
353:, the editor who brought the AfD, presumably in an attempt to withdraw the deletion request. I agree, however, that the AfD should run its course as there are delete comments from people other than the nominator.
418:. You're right, whether or not I think it is useful is immaterial. I don't knw anyone who uses this site either, though. But there seems to be some notability per the sources that you uncovered. --
213:
This is actually a fascinating site-- a social bookmarking site for academic papers. Well worth browsing. I had heard of it, but never tried it until just now. Now if i could only remember just
273:
article from Liber
Quarterly. Anyhow, sad and ironic to see overzealous Wikipedians trying to squelch the flow of structured scholarly information. You don't score points for successful AfDs.
231:
which although not a formal source, is a fairly reliable source widely used in the profession--and with a quite informative pair of comments. ,6/ Refs on other professional lists :
121:
172:
284:
17:
280:
88:
83:
92:
222:
270:
448:
359:
75:
36:
447:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
305:
274:
265:
article discusses it although I can't access the full-text (saw a snip of the paragraph in a GScholar search).
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
240:. Put together, I think this is enough to show widespread academic use of it, & consequent notability .
53:
335:
keep by a non-administrator. I have overturned that as the person had absolutely no business doing so.
235:
229:
354:
232:
427:
410:
387:
364:
344:
340:
323:
288:
251:
205:
201:
187:
162:
149:
79:
57:
350:
129:
319:
269:
SSRN working paper (author affiliated with the Max Planck
Society) also discusses it. So this
183:
142:
71:
63:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
423:
383:
266:
238:
225:
336:
332:
311:
197:
218:
406:
247:
159:
315:
179:
109:
419:
379:
49:
401:
300:
242:
217:
I had heard of it.... .Found the following refs. 1/ a blog posting
196:. The subject needs to GetNOTABILITY before we can include it here.
237:, and, finally, a group of well informed letters to Science magazine
441:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
228:, 4/ A discussion on the professional mailing list web4lib,
128:
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability.
116:
105:
101:
97:
158:unless independent reliable sources can be found.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
451:). No further edits should be made to this page.
173:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
310:make it clearly notable. Close this AfD per
171:: This debate has been included in the
7:
298:. The university sources listed by
24:
331:This was erroneously closed as a
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
428:10:23, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
411:03:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
388:07:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
365:22:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
345:21:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
324:13:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
289:08:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
252:09:52, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
206:06:18, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
188:05:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
163:22:08, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
150:21:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
58:19:18, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
468:
349:It was actually closed by
444:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
363:
190:
176:
148:
459:
446:
357:
308:
277:
226:Univ. of Alberta
177:
167:
145:
140:
138:
135:
132:
119:
113:
95:
34:
467:
466:
462:
461:
460:
458:
457:
456:
455:
449:deletion review
442:
355:Espresso Addict
306:
275:
143:
136:
133:
130:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
465:
463:
454:
453:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
391:
390:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
292:
291:
255:
254:
208:
191:
165:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
464:
452:
450:
445:
439:
438:
429:
425:
421:
417:
414:
413:
412:
408:
404:
403:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
389:
385:
381:
377:
376:
372:
366:
361:
356:
352:
348:
347:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
327:
326:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
303:
302:
297:
294:
293:
290:
286:
282:
278:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
256:
253:
249:
245:
244:
239:
236:
233:
230:
227:
223:
219:
216:
212:
209:
207:
203:
199:
195:
192:
189:
185:
181:
174:
170:
166:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:
152:
151:
146:
139:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
443:
440:
415:
400:
374:
373:
328:
299:
295:
261:I know that
258:
241:
214:
210:
193:
168:
155:
127:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
416:Weak keep
337:JBsupreme
198:JBsupreme
180:• Gene93k
122:View log
72:GetCITED
64:GetCITED
375:Neutral
351:Schuym1
333:WP:SNOW
316:Philcha
312:WP:SNOW
89:protect
84:history
420:Crusio
380:Crusio
194:Delete
160:Powers
156:Delete
117:delete
93:delete
50:Stifle
224:, 3/
215:where
131:Schuy
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
424:talk
407:talk
384:talk
360:talk
341:talk
329:NOTE
320:talk
304:and
296:keep
271:this
267:This
263:this
259:Keep
248:talk
211:Keep
202:talk
184:talk
169:Note
144:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
402:DGG
301:DGG
279:| (
243:DGG
178:--
175:.
426:)
409:)
386:)
343:)
322:)
314:--
307:II
287:)
283:-
276:II
250:)
234:,
204:)
186:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
422:(
405:(
382:(
362:)
358:(
339:(
318:(
285:c
281:t
246:(
200:(
182:(
147:)
141:(
137:1
134:m
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.