286:
couldn't source it better, but I didn't bother looking as this is way in the future. Thirdly, if any information was to be located, then it may belong in the main GeForce article - but as it's all speculation (and, seemingly, quite wild speculation as well), then it's not really appropriate to do that either. It's also completely pointless having this userfied (it would have to stay there for at least 2 years; may as well start from scratch when it comes closer to the release date.)
343:. It was from a talk given by the CEO of the company. The Volta architecture is listed under the GPU Roadmap in the second image. The two main faults with this current article that I agree with are that the Volta architecture has not been announced as the formal GeForce 900 series and the 2016 release date is merely interpolated.
285:
Thing is, that's not really appropriate. For starters, neither of those have been released, so talk of a "successor" is very premature. Secondly, this article is solely sourced to an NVidia blog post - not even an official roadmap on their website, or in a press release. That's not to say that you
312:
Also, apologies if it looks like I'm being unduly harsh; I was not aware you were a lesser experienced
Knowledge editor, and hopefully this experience won't put you off making other articles. If you want any help, feel free to ask me, or any tame administrator. :)
379:
That source is much better, and that redirect would be perfectly valid, assuming a brief mention in that section is made. I'd leave out mention of the release date for now, though, unless there's a half-decent source with their vague estimate at one.
270:
As the original author of the page (and a rookie wikipedia editor), I agree that the information is not full enough to have an article by itself. It can be merged into a subtopic of a previous generation GeForce page (either 700 or 800)
178:
406:
section (along with some minor updates to that section). What is the process for closing the discussion? I will hold off on creating the redirect until the discussion is formally closed.
402:
It is not yet the typical 7 days, but I don't think anyone else will be contributing to the discussion and we both agree to replace the existing page with a redirect to the
172:
241:
131:
138:
104:
99:
216:. Sourced entirely to an NVidia blog, and there's no guarantee that it will be named anything like this, or that major changes won't appear.
108:
91:
339:
No worries. It seems that someone had changed my reference article from an
Engadget article to the nVidia blog. The engadget one is
193:
160:
17:
154:
258:
482:
40:
455:
441:
415:
397:
370:
352:
330:
303:
280:
264:
233:
73:
150:
95:
200:
478:
436:
392:
325:
298:
228:
68:
36:
425:
381:
314:
287:
217:
186:
57:
451:
411:
366:
348:
276:
87:
79:
166:
340:
213:
209:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
477:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
253:
447:
407:
362:
344:
272:
424:
As you're the author of the page, if you redirect it now, I'll then shut the AfD.
125:
246:
403:
358:
53:
471:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
121:
117:
113:
185:
357:What do you think of making the page a redirect to
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
485:). No further edits should be made to this page.
242:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
199:
8:
240:Note: This debate has been included in the
239:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
502:
474:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
456:19:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
442:16:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
416:15:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
398:19:21, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
371:17:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
353:17:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
331:15:03, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
304:14:55, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
281:14:30, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
265:08:06, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
234:07:04, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
74:20:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
56:. (non-admin closure)
438:(tell Luke off here)
394:(tell Luke off here)
327:(tell Luke off here)
300:(tell Luke off here)
230:(tell Luke off here)
70:(tell Luke off here)
88:GeForce 900 Series
80:GeForce 900 Series
267:
493:
476:
434:
431:
428:
390:
387:
384:
323:
320:
317:
296:
293:
290:
263:
261:
256:
251:
226:
223:
220:
204:
203:
189:
141:
129:
111:
66:
63:
60:
48:The result was
34:
501:
500:
496:
495:
494:
492:
491:
490:
489:
483:deletion review
472:
432:
429:
426:
388:
385:
382:
321:
318:
315:
294:
291:
288:
259:
254:
247:
245:
224:
221:
218:
146:
137:
102:
86:
83:
64:
61:
58:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
499:
497:
488:
487:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
444:
419:
418:
404:GeForce#Future
400:
374:
373:
359:GeForce#Future
355:
334:
333:
307:
306:
268:
207:
206:
143:
82:
77:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
498:
486:
484:
480:
475:
469:
457:
453:
449:
445:
443:
440:
439:
435:
423:
422:
421:
420:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
399:
396:
395:
391:
378:
377:
376:
375:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
337:
336:
335:
332:
329:
328:
324:
311:
310:
309:
308:
305:
302:
301:
297:
284:
283:
282:
278:
274:
269:
266:
262:
257:
252:
250:
243:
238:
237:
236:
235:
232:
231:
227:
215:
211:
202:
198:
195:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
152:
149:
148:Find sources:
144:
140:
136:
133:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
106:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:
81:
78:
76:
75:
72:
71:
67:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
473:
470:
437:
393:
326:
299:
248:
229:
208:
196:
190:
182:
175:
169:
163:
157:
147:
134:
69:
49:
47:
31:
28:
173:free images
214:WP:TOOSOON
210:WP:CRYSTAL
479:talk page
37:talk page
481:or in a
448:Rgrasmus
408:Rgrasmus
363:Rgrasmus
345:Rgrasmus
273:Rgrasmus
132:View log
50:Redirect
39:or in a
179:WP refs
167:scholar
105:protect
100:history
54:GeForce
151:Google
109:delete
446:Done
194:JSTOR
155:books
139:Stats
126:views
118:watch
114:links
16:<
452:talk
427:Luke
412:talk
383:Luke
367:talk
349:talk
341:here
316:Luke
289:Luke
277:talk
249:czar
219:Luke
212:and
187:FENS
161:news
122:logs
96:talk
92:edit
59:Luke
201:TWL
130:– (
52:to
454:)
433:94
430:no
414:)
389:94
386:no
369:)
361:?
351:)
322:94
319:no
295:94
292:no
279:)
244:.
225:94
222:no
181:)
124:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
65:94
62:no
450:(
410:(
365:(
347:(
275:(
260:·
255:·
205:)
197:·
191:·
183:·
176:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
153:(
145:(
142:)
135:·
128:)
90:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.