303:. Per nomination and as in original deletion discussion linked by joe decker above . Mewse might become notable if her upcoming album is on a major. Unfortunately, if this becomes the case all other unreferenced or badly-referenced fanpoop (see original upload of this latest offering) will be added on its back.
285:
Comment: I carefully reviewed both the deleted version and the newly created version and found nothing that addressed the concerns raised in the first deletion discussion. In my opinion, it met the "sufficiently identical and unimproved" clause in CSD criterion G4.
218:, recreated from a subset of the sources used in the previous article, presumably the same rationale would still apply. May even qualify as CSD G4, I decided it was too borderline myself. I ask that if this is also deleted, that the article be salted.
348:, and IP 84.13.107.25, were specially created one edit set-ups to contest a PROD deletion with an edit summary that I believe is in similar style to the out-of-the-woodwork IP comments seen through joe decker’s Mewse
183:
90:
233:
as non-notable. I tagged as G4 speedy, I don't have access to the old article, but the reviewing admin will and can make the determination. Regardless, I felt it was reasonable to attempt.
308:
From the previous deleted page, (which I copied suspecting it would creep back), I can see that this current Mewse page, at its original inception version by specially set-up for the purpose
254:. Obviously, if in the future she charts on an official chart, or meets any of the other criteria for inclusion, then the article can be recreated - but at the moment, no
144:
250:
I feel that it is not quite close enough to G4 to delete speedily (although I would not argue with anyone so doing), but I feel that at the moment, she does not meet
177:
349:
215:
85:
274:
117:
112:
17:
373:
295:
280:
242:
224:
69:
121:
198:
165:
104:
386:
36:
385:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
313:
159:
268:
238:
361:
345:
155:
108:
222:
357:
329:
325:
309:
205:
191:
369:
251:
100:
75:
65:
324:. It is interesting that the first upload of the current page was very quickly trimmed-down by
291:
257:
234:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
219:
171:
365:
61:
57:
49:
353:
317:
287:
53:
332:
in his/hers original upload of the latest Mewse article adds in the edit summary:
138:
364:, IP 84.13.107.25, and the IP addresses on the previous deletion discussion.
352:. I request a sockpuppet investigation of potential links between
379:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
335:
328:, perhaps in realisation of inference that could be drawn.
312:, was a virtual copy of the previous article originated by
341:
321:
134:
130:
126:
190:
91:Articles for deletion/Gemma Mewse (2nd nomination)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
389:). No further edits should be made to this page.
204:
8:
344:of the Leddra Chapman article we see that a
216:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Gemma Mewse
83:
336:http://en.wikipedia.org/Leddra_Chapman
7:
82:
24:
86:Articles for deletion/Gemma Mewse
340:– Why? Checking through to the
316:who changed his/her moniker to
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
231:Delete, speedy or otherwise
406:
374:03:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
296:03:19, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
281:00:09, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
243:23:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
225:23:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
214:Recently closed as delete
70:10:25, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
382:Please do not modify it.
314:User:Mdanie2/Gemma Mewse
32:Please do not modify it.
81:AfDs for this article:
362:User:Leddrachapman
346:User:Leddrachapman
44:The result was
294:
58:Non-admin closure
397:
384:
342:revision history
290:
277:
271:
263:
260:
209:
208:
194:
142:
124:
34:
405:
404:
400:
399:
398:
396:
395:
394:
393:
387:deletion review
380:
275:
269:
261:
258:
151:
115:
99:
96:
79:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
403:
401:
392:
391:
376:
358:User:Ughughugh
330:User:Ughughugh
326:User:Ughughugh
310:User:Ughughugh
305:
304:
298:
283:
245:
212:
211:
148:
95:
94:
93:
88:
80:
78:
73:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
402:
390:
388:
383:
377:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
337:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
306:
302:
299:
297:
293:
289:
284:
282:
278:
272:
266:
265:
264:
253:
249:
246:
244:
240:
236:
232:
229:
228:
227:
226:
223:
221:
217:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:Find sources:
149:
146:
140:
136:
132:
128:
123:
119:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
97:
92:
89:
87:
84:
77:
74:
72:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
46:speedy delete
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
381:
378:
354:User:Mdanie2
333:
318:User:Mdanie2
300:
256:
255:
247:
235:Dennis Brown
230:
213:
201:
195:
187:
180:
174:
168:
162:
152:
45:
43:
31:
28:
252:WP:MUSICBIO
178:free images
101:Gemma Mewse
76:Gemma Mewse
320:to upload
220:joe decker
366:Acabashi
276:contribs
145:View log
62:Pgallert
288:Rossami
259:Phantom
184:WP refs
172:scholar
118:protect
113:history
54:Rossami
301:Delete
292:(talk)
248:Delete
156:Google
122:delete
334:"See
262:Steve
199:JSTOR
160:books
139:views
131:watch
127:links
52:) by
16:<
370:talk
350:link
322:this
270:talk
239:talk
192:FENS
166:news
135:logs
109:talk
105:edit
66:talk
206:TWL
143:– (
372:)
360:,
356:,
279:\
241:)
186:)
137:|
133:|
129:|
125:|
120:|
116:|
111:|
107:|
68:)
60:--
56:.
50:G4
368:(
338:"
273:|
267:/
237:(
210:)
202:·
196:·
188:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
158:(
150:(
147:)
141:)
103:(
64:(
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.