282:
forum subgroups and her administrators be published in a known periodical simply to satisfy all aspects of WP:V? Verifiability is important, but there are limits to it. These are sane, common sense limits. We don't troll every article and question whether paraphrases used the definite or indefinite article, because its nonsense, because things as fluid and vague as that are verifiable in so far as you can check up on them yourself, but pegging down the exactness of it is nigh impossible. Should we exclude who admins the forums because Time magazine has never mentioned them?
241:: "Sounds like a version of Something Awful" -- good thing Something Awful isn't some archetype or prototype or litmus test for relevance, otherwise your comment might have some merit. Something Awful could equally be said to be a "version of" Old Man Murray or Stile Project. Should we delete the Something Awful article too then?
304:
So could deliberately "misunderstanding" the use of the word troll to make it go from the very obvious in-context meaning of trolling in the sense of dragging a net vs. the "how could you possibly think it means that in the context given" meaning of deliberately attempting to incite a flame war. Now
281:
absolutely nothing to work with is totally counter-productive. The size of Genmay is easily verifiable through big boards. The rest of the material of the article is the structure of the forums and the administration of them -- do you honestly expect such a ridiculous litmus test to be applied that
213:. No reliable sources at the moment means no notability. We've deleted forum articles with similar (or higher) activity. Though, this is a pretty large forum compared to many that currently (and unfortunately) have articles. ---
318:
If I misunderstood your comment, I apologize. In any case, I suggest that we stick to the subject at hand (General Mayhem). Whatever problems you have with me can be discussed elsewhere, such as my talk page.
273:
No, it's not the most important issue, but it's been brought up as an issue nonetheless. I know you're delete-crazy Wicket, but removing an entire article and giving the people who
305:
since I have demonstrable example of bad faith from you, perhaps you could explain how "delete-crazy" is bad faith? I'm sure any RfC would want to know.
291:
I would suggest you tone down some of your wordings. "delete-crazy" and "troll" can be seen as inflammatory and an assumption of bad faith.
198:
83:
78:
112:
Web forum that doesn't seem to meet WP:V or WP:WEB. I asked for some sources on the talk page and they didn't seem to know of any.
17:
87:
70:
358:
36:
357:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
202:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
344:
323:
309:
295:
286:
266:
245:
229:
217:
205:
189:
165:
145:
120:
52:
177:. If they've done something amazingly different with their membership, then there might be an argument.
306:
283:
242:
183:
48:
Despite promises, reliable sources never appeared. If they do exist let me know and I will undelete.
162:
74:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
158:
320:
292:
263:
117:
154:
341:
254:
Anyways, I don't think thats the most important issue here. What about sources? Meeting
179:
174:
186:
66:
58:
278:
255:
226:
142:
214:
104:
130:
197:: Already came up for deletion, back in the stone age, as "Genmay" (see
237:
for the reasons
Macarion stated above. It needs work, not deletion.
351:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
129:, it looks like by far the most active web forum I've seen.
201:). Appears to have never been closed, though. Curious... -
100:
96:
92:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
153:unless sources are cited to assert notability per
361:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
199:Knowledge (XXG):Votes_for_deletion/Genmay
225:, one of the largest forums existing --
340:. I'll cite some sources right now. --
173:, but weak. Sounds like a version of
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
161:(it is technically a company).
116:as failing WP:V and/or WP:WEB.
1:
345:22:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
324:08:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
310:05:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
296:22:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
287:08:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
53:17:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
267:22:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
246:18:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
230:22:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
218:05:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
206:01:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
190:02:09, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
166:10:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
146:09:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
121:08:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
378:
354:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
203:Hit bull, win steak
369:
356:
139:
136:
133:
108:
90:
34:
377:
376:
372:
371:
370:
368:
367:
366:
365:
359:deletion review
352:
307:Professor Ninja
284:Professor Ninja
243:Professor Ninja
175:Something Awful
137:
134:
131:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
375:
373:
364:
363:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
313:
312:
299:
298:
270:
269:
249:
248:
232:
220:
208:
192:
168:
163:Kavadi carrier
148:
110:
109:
67:General Mayhem
61:
59:General Mayhem
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
374:
362:
360:
355:
349:
348:
347:
346:
343:
339:
325:
322:
317:
316:
315:
314:
311:
308:
303:
302:
301:
300:
297:
294:
290:
289:
288:
285:
280:
276:
272:
271:
268:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
251:
250:
247:
244:
240:
236:
233:
231:
228:
224:
221:
219:
216:
212:
209:
207:
204:
200:
196:
193:
191:
188:
185:
182:
181:
176:
172:
169:
167:
164:
160:
156:
152:
149:
147:
144:
140:
128:
125:
124:
123:
122:
119:
115:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
353:
350:
337:
336:
274:
259:
238:
234:
222:
210:
194:
178:
170:
150:
126:
113:
111:
45:
43:
31:
28:
321:Wickethewok
293:Wickethewok
264:Wickethewok
262:optional.
211:Weak delete
118:Wickethewok
342:Indolences
127:Weak keep
277:fulfill
227:Macarion
239:Comment
215:RockMFR
195:Comment
159:WP:CORP
84:protect
79:history
50:W.marsh
180:humble
171:Delete
155:WP:WEB
151:Delete
114:Delete
88:delete
46:delete
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
338:Keep
279:WP:V
275:will
256:WP:V
235:Keep
223:Keep
184:fool
143:Talk
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
260:not
258:is
157:or
141:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
187:®
138:P
135:I
132:J
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.