Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Genius Inside (3rd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

350:
As far as I can tell, the awards are for software within the Lotus Notes community, not for project management software in general. This is not sufficient for notability. Since the WSJ article seems to be merely an announcement of the awards, I'm not sure its relevant for notability either.
194: 420:
broadly as per my position on the previous AfD. The WSJ piece that has been added is attributed there to "Marketwired" which describes itself as a "Newswire service for online press release distribution"
92: 87: 450:
Though a few references should be cleaned up, subject received multiple awards deeming notability and there are numerous reliable sources noting this project management software.
242: 188: 343:. Subject is notable through multiple reliable sources citing it as international project management software and technology awards. Botidr 08:54, 3 July 2013 (UTC) 282: 262: 147: 154: 82: 225:
Previously deleted late last year as non-notable. Article seems sufficiently different to not be speedy eligible, so asking community to evaluate.
120: 115: 124: 459: 441: 408: 380: 362: 332: 294: 274: 254: 234: 65: 17: 107: 209: 176: 477: 40: 170: 376: 166: 473: 455: 404: 324: 111: 36: 216: 429: 424:
and is an announcement of an award from TopTenREVIEWS; neither the award nor the press release are
202: 103: 71: 372: 290: 270: 250: 60: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
472:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
451: 400: 389: 317: 305: 371:
Wall Street Journal and multiple other awards should be enough on this one for notability.
182: 437: 230: 358: 425: 286: 266: 246: 54: 141: 433: 392:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
308:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
226: 353: 466:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
422: 137: 133: 129: 399:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  —
201: 93:
Articles for deletion/Genius Inside (3rd nomination)
88:
Articles for deletion/Genius Inside (2nd nomination)
315:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 480:). No further edits should be made to this page. 243:list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions 283:list of Software-related deletion discussions 263:list of Business-related deletion discussions 215: 8: 281:Note: This debate has been included in the 261:Note: This debate has been included in the 241:Note: This debate has been included in the 280: 260: 240: 80: 7: 83:Articles for deletion/Genius Inside 78: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 497: 460:16:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 295:23:47, 24 June 2013 (UTC) 275:23:47, 24 June 2013 (UTC) 255:23:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC) 235:13:28, 24 June 2013 (UTC) 66:17:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 469:Please do not modify it. 442:05:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC) 409:04:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC) 381:00:32, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 363:04:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC) 333:00:08, 1 July 2013 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 77:AfDs for this article: 48:The result was 411: 335: 297: 277: 257: 488: 471: 398: 394: 330: 327: 320: 314: 310: 220: 219: 205: 157: 145: 127: 34: 496: 495: 491: 490: 489: 487: 486: 485: 484: 478:deletion review 467: 387: 325: 322: 318: 303: 162: 153: 118: 102: 99: 97: 75: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 494: 492: 483: 482: 445: 444: 426:clear evidence 414: 413: 412: 396: 395: 384: 366: 365: 338: 337: 336: 312: 311: 300: 299: 298: 278: 258: 223: 222: 159: 98: 96: 95: 90: 85: 79: 76: 74: 69: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 493: 481: 479: 475: 470: 464: 463: 462: 461: 457: 453: 449: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 416: 415: 410: 406: 402: 397: 393: 391: 386: 385: 383: 382: 378: 374: 370: 364: 360: 356: 355: 349: 346: 345: 344: 342: 334: 331: 328: 321: 313: 309: 307: 302: 301: 296: 292: 288: 284: 279: 276: 272: 268: 264: 259: 256: 252: 248: 244: 239: 238: 237: 236: 232: 228: 218: 214: 211: 208: 204: 200: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 178: 175: 172: 168: 165: 164:Find sources: 160: 156: 152: 149: 143: 139: 135: 131: 126: 122: 117: 113: 109: 105: 104:Genius Inside 101: 100: 94: 91: 89: 86: 84: 81: 73: 72:Genius Inside 70: 68: 67: 63: 62: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 468: 465: 447: 446: 418:Delete again 417: 388: 373:FifthCircuit 368: 367: 352: 347: 340: 339: 316: 304: 224: 212: 206: 198: 191: 185: 179: 173: 163: 150: 59: 53: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 452:Rhaulumajik 401:Crisco 1492 319:Theopolisme 189:free images 430:notability 474:talk page 287:• Gene93k 267:• Gene93k 247:• Gene93k 37:talk page 476:or in a 390:Relisted 306:Relisted 148:View log 39:or in a 195:WP refs 183:scholar 121:protect 116:history 55:postdlf 348:Delete 167:Google 125:delete 434:AllyD 359:talk 210:JSTOR 171:books 155:Stats 142:views 134:watch 130:links 16:< 456:talk 448:Keep 438:talk 405:talk 377:talk 369:Keep 341:Keep 326:talk 291:talk 271:talk 251:talk 231:talk 227:Camw 203:FENS 177:news 138:logs 112:talk 108:edit 61:talk 428:of 354:DGG 217:TWL 146:– ( 458:) 440:) 432:. 407:) 379:) 361:) 293:) 285:. 273:) 265:. 253:) 245:. 233:) 197:) 140:| 136:| 132:| 128:| 123:| 119:| 114:| 110:| 64:) 52:. 454:( 436:( 403:( 375:( 357:( 329:) 323:( 289:( 269:( 249:( 229:( 221:) 213:· 207:· 199:· 192:· 186:· 180:· 174:· 169:( 161:( 158:) 151:· 144:) 106:( 58:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
postdlf
talk
17:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Genius Inside
Articles for deletion/Genius Inside
Articles for deletion/Genius Inside (2nd nomination)
Articles for deletion/Genius Inside (3rd nomination)
Genius Inside
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.