Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Georg Immanuel Nagel - Knowledge

Source 📝

312: 316: 290: 399:
The criteria you quote is not obligatory, it is just a hint for relevancy. Every single case has to be checked individually and there is other criteria noted as well besides of this. I think that his cooperations with internationally known artists are highly notable. Together with his numerous gigs
384:
I recognize that he is 25; even if he fails to meet our notability criteria now, he may in the future. Inasmuch as you started the article, if it is not kept you might consider requesting to have it userfied, so that if/when he develops further indicia of notability you could re-create the article
348:
Hi. What I am looking for is indicia that he meets wp's notability criteria. One way that he can do this is by substantial (non-trivial, non-passing) coverage in RSs. That would meet GNG. As to his releases, they do not suffice because he does not have two or more albums on a major label or on
333:
As I've said, he is important for his work in the music industry. The information about his writing is additional (delete if you want). What exactly are you looking for? He fulfills the criteria for musicians with his releases, cooperations with other renowned artists and gigs. - So, I've reworked
366:
Cooperation with renowned artists is generally not in and of itself, without more, considered indicia of notability I believe. Gigs, similarly, are not -- unless they are RS-covered tours or the like that meet our notability
162: 225: 414:
I am referring to our notability guidelines for people generally, and for musicians, both of which there is no evidence of him meeting. I have no objection to the article being userfied as it is deleted from
400:(even if mainly in the German speaking area) and his activity as host of several events etc. there is enough to consider him relevant. And of course I'de prefer userfying before deleting...-- 465: 156: 123: 219: 293:
and you'll find enough sources (535.000 results). He is most popular among the German speaking countries, but his records are sold worldwide. Or check Nagel's entry in the
443: 349:
one of the more important indie labels (he has instead published them on the label he created, which does not appear to be one of the more important ones).
96: 91: 100: 83: 523:- No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. His importance is asserted in this discussion, but I can find no sources that 311:
Help me -- unless I am doing the search incorrectly (quite possible) -- using that name I still can't find substantial RS coverage on
617:- no claims of notability, no in-depth coverage provided. Fails WP:GNG. Certainly doesn't pass the criteria of WP:NMUSIC currently. 177: 240: 144: 207: 17: 297:. The article exists since 2009 and Nagel is mostly relevant because of his musical works. I will adopt the article a bit...-- 506: 385:... but to have it withstand future AfDs, I would suggest that the next time you create it you support the text with refs.-- 319:. Am I missing some, and if so can you point me to two or three substantial RS coverage articles about him? Thanks.-- 138: 273:
He is mostly known under his old pseudonym "George le Nagelaux". Nagelaux has released enough records on vinyl... --
201: 626: 605: 571: 536: 511: 479: 457: 424: 409: 394: 343: 328: 306: 282: 265: 65: 59: 645: 134: 40: 603: 197: 87: 184: 405: 339: 302: 278: 256:
I can't find sufficient substantial RS coverage of this DJ/writer/philosopher/music producer/label-owner.
247: 79: 71: 641: 53: 36: 420: 390: 324: 261: 594: 233: 170: 150: 504: 213: 475: 453: 401: 335: 298: 274: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
640:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
583: 562: 546: 490: 622: 416: 386: 320: 257: 532: 501: 471: 449: 117: 557: 524: 618: 586:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
549:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
493:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
528: 294: 634:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
527:
that importance, and none have been offered in this AFD. --
466:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
113: 109: 105: 232: 169: 593:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 556:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 500:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 648:). No further edits should be made to this page. 246: 183: 8: 464:Note: This debate has been included in the 444:list of Austria-related deletion discussions 442:Note: This debate has been included in the 463: 441: 291:search for "George le Nagelaux" on Google 334:the article to make it more definite. -- 295:database of the German National Library 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 627:22:10, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 606:22:04, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 572:15:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 537:17:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 512:11:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 425:21:11, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 410:12:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 395:17:54, 11 January 2012 (UTC) 344:12:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC) 329:07:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC) 307:16:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 66:01:24, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 480:19:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 458:19:47, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 283:10:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 266:06:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 665: 637:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 80:Georg Immanuel Nagel 72:Georg Immanuel Nagel 48:The result was 608: 574: 514: 482: 469: 460: 447: 656: 639: 601: 592: 588: 569: 560: 555: 551: 499: 495: 470: 448: 251: 250: 236: 188: 187: 173: 121: 103: 62: 56: 55:CharlieEchoTango 34: 664: 663: 659: 658: 657: 655: 654: 653: 652: 646:deletion review 635: 595: 581: 563: 558: 544: 509: 508:about my edits? 502:Armbrust, B.Ed. 488: 193: 130: 94: 78: 75: 60: 54: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 662: 660: 651: 650: 630: 629: 611: 610: 609: 598:Alpha_Quadrant 590: 589: 578: 577: 576: 575: 553: 552: 541: 540: 539: 517: 516: 515: 507: 497: 496: 485: 484: 483: 461: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 287: 286: 285: 254: 253: 190: 127: 74: 69: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 661: 649: 647: 643: 638: 632: 631: 628: 624: 620: 616: 613: 612: 607: 604: 602: 600: 599: 591: 587: 585: 580: 579: 573: 570: 568: 567: 561: 554: 550: 548: 543: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 519: 518: 513: 510: 505: 503: 498: 494: 492: 487: 486: 481: 477: 473: 467: 462: 459: 455: 451: 445: 440: 439: 426: 422: 418: 413: 412: 411: 407: 403: 398: 397: 396: 392: 388: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 347: 346: 345: 341: 337: 332: 331: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 309: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 263: 259: 249: 245: 242: 239: 235: 231: 227: 224: 221: 218: 215: 212: 209: 206: 203: 199: 196: 195:Find sources: 191: 186: 182: 179: 176: 172: 168: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 136: 133: 132:Find sources: 128: 125: 119: 115: 111: 107: 102: 98: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 76: 73: 70: 68: 67: 63: 57: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 636: 633: 614: 597: 596: 582: 565: 564: 545: 520: 489: 415:mainspace.-- 402:Ataraxis1492 336:Ataraxis1492 299:Ataraxis1492 275:Ataraxis1492 255: 243: 237: 229: 222: 216: 210: 204: 194: 180: 174: 166: 159: 153: 147: 141: 131: 49: 47: 31: 28: 220:free images 157:free images 417:Epeefleche 387:Epeefleche 321:Epeefleche 258:Epeefleche 642:talk page 472:• Gene93k 450:• Gene93k 367:criteria. 37:talk page 644:or in a 584:Relisted 547:Relisted 491:Relisted 315:, or on 124:View log 39:or in a 226:WP refs 214:scholar 163:WP refs 151:scholar 97:protect 92:history 61:contact 615:Delete 525:verify 521:Delete 317:gbooks 198:Google 135:Google 101:delete 50:delete 619:Sionk 313:gnews 289:Just 241:JSTOR 202:books 178:JSTOR 139:books 118:views 110:watch 106:links 16:< 623:talk 533:talk 529:Whpq 476:talk 454:talk 421:talk 406:talk 391:talk 340:talk 325:talk 303:talk 279:talk 262:talk 234:FENS 208:news 171:FENS 145:news 114:logs 88:talk 84:edit 559:Ged 248:TWL 185:TWL 122:– ( 625:) 566:UK 535:) 478:) 468:. 456:) 446:. 423:) 408:) 393:) 342:) 327:) 305:) 281:) 264:) 228:) 165:) 116:| 112:| 108:| 104:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 64:) 52:. 621:( 531:( 474:( 452:( 419:( 404:( 389:( 338:( 323:( 301:( 277:( 260:( 252:) 244:· 238:· 230:· 223:· 217:· 211:· 205:· 200:( 192:( 189:) 181:· 175:· 167:· 160:· 154:· 148:· 142:· 137:( 129:( 126:) 120:) 82:( 58:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
CharlieEchoTango
contact
01:24, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Georg Immanuel Nagel
Georg Immanuel Nagel
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.