207:
of the book he edited seems to suggest he's a leading figure in his field. These cropped up on the first two google pages of his name along with "epistemology" (to filter out others with the same name), so it appears someone with more expert knowledge could easily establish his notability in the
253:
Yes, that's much better. I think we can keep this now. Kinda surprising that someone of his apparent reputation hasn't had more attention, but sometimes these kid of articles tend to get buried in the huge mountain of stuff that is
Knowledge.
152:
110:
236:- satisfying just one makes them "definitely notable". I've also given it a "philosopher-stub" tag and added it to Category:Epistemologists, which according to
220:
Fair enough, if those folks can help out, I'll gladly reconsider. If he's that notable, this article may need expansion instead. I'll keep an open mind here.
118:
Non-notable college professor. No sources, not able to verify, only a handful of relevant Google hits. Amazingly, this article has been around for five years.
237:
83:
78:
87:
203:
indicates it's being used in courses and calls it "the best collection of essays" on a particular problem within epistemology.
17:
70:
204:
208:
article. Suggest mentioning it one of the
Philosophy-related wikiprojects to remedy the "lack of activity" issue.
319:
200:
36:
318:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
304:
292:
280:
258:
248:
224:
212:
191:
175:
162:
140:
123:
52:
172:
159:
301:
132:
Sufficient sources have been added to prove the subject's notability well above the standards of
74:
277:
245:
209:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
276:, which to me absolutely establishes that he's viewed as a leading expert in epistemology.
255:
221:
137:
120:
241:
233:
133:
188:
184:
66:
58:
273:
199:
The "widely used" book mentioned in the article indicates notability in his field;
49:
104:
289:
232:
I've added and sourced enough that it meets the first three criteria at
168:
136:. No need to proceed further with this nomination; move to close.
312:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
240:
recent proposal would see it coming to the attention of the
100:
96:
92:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
48:per withdrawal of nomination. Non-admin closure.--
153:list of Academics and educators-related deletions
322:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
272:He's also responsible for an entry in the
244:, presumably to be expanded and improved.
151:: This debate has been included in the
7:
274:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
24:
288:in serious need of improvement.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
53:22:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
305:08:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
293:20:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
281:17:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
259:05:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
249:20:58, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
225:18:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
213:16:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
192:16:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
176:16:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
163:16:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
141:05:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
130:Update: Nomination withdrawn.
124:16:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
339:
300:per nominator withdrawl.--
315:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
242:Epistemology task force
165:
156:
330:
317:
157:
147:
108:
90:
34:
338:
337:
333:
332:
331:
329:
328:
327:
326:
320:deletion review
313:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
336:
334:
325:
324:
308:
307:
295:
283:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
194:
178:
166:
144:
143:
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
335:
323:
321:
316:
310:
309:
306:
303:
299:
296:
294:
291:
287:
284:
282:
279:
275:
271:
268:
260:
257:
252:
251:
250:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
228:
227:
226:
223:
219:
216:
215:
214:
211:
206:
202:
198:
195:
193:
190:
186:
182:
179:
177:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
154:
150:
146:
145:
142:
139:
135:
131:
128:
127:
126:
125:
122:
119:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:George Pappas
64:
63:
60:
59:George Pappas
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
314:
311:
297:
285:
278:Thomjakobsen
269:
246:Thomjakobsen
229:
217:
210:Thomjakobsen
196:
180:
148:
129:
117:
116:
45:
43:
31:
28:
205:This review
197:Strong Keep
256:Realkyhick
222:Realkyhick
171:per nom.--
138:Realkyhick
121:Realkyhick
201:this link
173:Yeshivish
160:Yeshivish
286:Keep but
218:Comment:
189:GreenJoe
183:, fails
111:View log
302:Miamite
270:Comment
234:WP:PROF
230:Comment
134:WP:PROF
84:protect
79:history
50:JForget
185:WP:BIO
181:Delete
169:Delete
88:delete
290:UTAFA
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
298:Keep
238:this
149:Note
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
46:Keep
155:.
109:– (
187:.
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
158:—
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.