490:
happens to be the Museum
Director of). Moseley was severely injured in the jump, and was described by witnesses as having such a severe broken leg that the bone protruded from his trousers, yet he refused medical attention, unsuccesfully tried to capture a horse to direct his troops from, and actually did direct them from a wheelbarrow. He only relinquished command after the Commanding General of the Division ordered him to do so because of his intense pain and the severe injury. When Knowledge (XXG) keeps articles of such trifling nature and transitory interest as the 'biographies' of obscure, minor cartoon characters, it is a travesty that an article about a famous war hero of real WWII history be omitted. This seems opposed to everything Knowledge (XXG) stands for. Granted, the article is currently weak in content and deserves expansion. I would add that one of the iconic photo series of the D-Day operations, and even World War II, is that of General Eisenhower accompanied by this same Colonel Moseley reviewing his paratroopers just prior to the invasion, and this photo should also be added to the article.
215:
Forget the movies and the medals. Here is a man who not only and commanded, trained and but parachuted into
Normandy with the 502d Parachute Infantry Regiment of the 101st Airborne Division in the pre dawn darkness of D-Day 1944. He refused to be evacuated, commanding his regiment from a 2 wheeled
131:
Article has been tagged for lack of notability for over a year, and with good reason, for the subject isn't notable. Biography of an
American officer in World War II whose greatest claim of notability appears to be (1) being one of several people who were together made a composite single character
234:
To the contrary: there's a full biography from a reliable source that's linked to Sink's article, while there's nothing of such a sort for
Moseley. Simply doing what you say he did (and I'm sure you're correct) doesn't make him at all notable, unlike receiving significant coverage as Sink has.
489:
Contrary to the original comment, Van Horn
Moseley is not just 'any army officer'. He was one of the Army's first airborne officers, commander of one of the U.S. Army's crack Parachute Infantry Regiments, of perhaps it's most famous Division, the 101st Airborne (the Division which this writer
136:. Neither of these confer notability, individually or together. There are four references, but one is a directory, two are likely obituaries, and the final is a regimental history: if these confer notability, any military officer whose death was noted in a newspaper is likely notable.
467:
Tons of phone books have been written for my county since I was born, so we have many reliable sources to verify my father's phone number, but that doesn't make him notable. Would these "tons of books" really amount to significant coverage?
513:
guidelines. The article has been expanded. Seven citations were added in the year prior to its nomination for deletion. Numerous additional internal and external references have been added in the past four days with more to
155:
448:
The sources are probably sufficient. Tons of books have been written over the airborne operations in
Normandy, so I suspect that all regimental/brigade commanders in the British and US airborne units would pass
386:
There are two people with this name: the father, General George Van Horn
Moseley (1874-1960), and son, Colonel George Van Horn Moseley Jr. (1905-1976). There are reliable sources for both of these men.
279:) 01:54, 9 August 2008 (UTC) Changed my mind based on information below. The father is notable and the information about the son could be merged into the article about the father. --
410:
The lack of notability does not detract from the honorable service to his country by this individual. The story/character that shows some notability is not the subject, however. --
124:
308:
220:
of Band of
Brothers fame, has a better written and more complete article but is in actual fact no more notable. The article on Moseley should be strengthened not deleted.
339:
91:
86:
95:
78:
177:. He was certainly very well decorated, but I don't think that means he was notable. However, I think that this one falls only just below the threshold.
154:. He isn't looking notable to me, but I'd say a few good (as in, from decent sources and of a decent length) obituaries would confer notability.
196:
The subject does not appear to be notable. As stated above, there may be information available to change that opinion but I couldn,t find it. --
342:
372:
Hmm... I'm confused. Those search results identify him as a general, but the article says he was a colonel. Are these the same person? --
429:
There is no lack of notability, this subject has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
17:
82:
523:
499:
477:
462:
438:
419:
396:
381:
362:
323:
296:
244:
229:
205:
186:
167:
145:
60:
48:
Several references have been added during the AfD, and it is not clear to what degree these have been taken into account.
358:
74:
66:
541:
36:
182:
540:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
346:
458:
495:
338:
should be doing a google book search. There seems to be good deal of sources related to this subject.
178:
163:
491:
415:
201:
473:
454:
240:
141:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
287:) 21:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC) Changed my mind yet again. It now appears that he's notable. --
434:
392:
377:
354:
319:
292:
284:
276:
510:
450:
263:
519:
225:
133:
159:
51:
411:
197:
469:
236:
137:
112:
430:
388:
373:
350:
315:
288:
280:
272:
217:
515:
221:
266:, which is the relevant determinant of notability at Knowledge (XXG).
534:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
119:
108:
104:
100:
158:throws up a couple of articles, but nothing much.
132:in a John Wayne movie, and (2) being awarded the
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
544:). No further edits should be made to this page.
309:list of Military-related deletion discussions
8:
307:: This debate has been included in the
46:no consensus to delete, default to keep.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
216:cart for two days. A colleague,
1:
262:Fails the notability test at
75:George Van Horn Moseley, Jr.
67:George Van Horn Moseley, Jr.
524:16:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
509:This article now meets all
500:15:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
478:12:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
463:08:42, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
439:00:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
420:21:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
397:19:29, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
382:19:17, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
363:18:10, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
297:17:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
61:21:56, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
561:
324:01:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
245:00:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
230:00:00, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
206:22:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
187:17:09, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
179:--Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran
168:16:25, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
146:15:21, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
537:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
334:People leaning towards
44:The result was
365:
349:comment added by
326:
312:
59:
552:
539:
344:
313:
303:
122:
116:
98:
58:
56:
49:
34:
560:
559:
555:
554:
553:
551:
550:
549:
548:
542:deletion review
535:
134:Legion of Merit
118:
89:
73:
70:
52:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
558:
556:
547:
546:
529:
527:
526:
503:
502:
483:
482:
481:
480:
442:
441:
423:
422:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
367:
366:
328:
327:
300:
299:
250:
249:
248:
247:
209:
208:
190:
189:
171:
170:
129:
128:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
557:
545:
543:
538:
532:
531:
530:
525:
521:
517:
512:
508:
505:
504:
501:
497:
493:
488:
485:
484:
479:
475:
471:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
447:
444:
443:
440:
436:
432:
428:
425:
424:
421:
417:
413:
409:
406:
405:
398:
394:
390:
385:
384:
383:
379:
375:
371:
370:
369:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
343:
340:
337:
333:
330:
329:
325:
321:
317:
310:
306:
302:
301:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
265:
260:
259:
256:
252:
251:
246:
242:
238:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
214:
211:
210:
207:
203:
199:
195:
192:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
150:
149:
148:
147:
143:
139:
135:
126:
121:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
57:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
536:
533:
528:
506:
486:
455:Nick Dowling
445:
426:
407:
335:
331:
304:
268:
261:
257:
254:
253:
212:
193:
174:
151:
130:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
487:Strong Keep
345:—Preceding
218:Robert Sink
156:Google News
152:Weak delete
511:notability
54:Sandstein
446:Weak keep
160:J Milburn
412:Stormbay
359:contribs
347:unsigned
198:Stormbay
125:View log
507:Comment
492:Tacitvs
470:Nyttend
408:Comment
332:comment
237:Nyttend
138:Nyttend
92:protect
87:history
451:WP:BIO
431:riffic
389:riffic
374:Orlady
351:Riffic
336:delete
316:Orlady
289:Orlady
281:Orlady
273:Orlady
264:WP:BIO
255:Delete
194:Delete
175:Delete
120:delete
96:delete
516:Hmose
514:come.
258:Merge
222:Hmose
213:Keep.
123:) – (
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
520:talk
496:talk
474:talk
459:talk
435:talk
427:Keep
416:talk
393:talk
378:talk
355:talk
341:and
320:talk
305:Note
293:talk
285:talk
277:talk
269:Keep
241:talk
226:talk
202:talk
183:talk
164:talk
142:talk
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
311:.
522:)
498:)
476:)
461:)
453:.
437:)
418:)
395:)
380:)
361:)
357:•
322:)
295:)
271:--
243:)
228:)
204:)
185:)
166:)
144:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
518:(
494:(
472:(
457:(
433:(
414:(
391:(
376:(
353:(
318:(
314:—
291:(
283:(
275:(
239:(
224:(
200:(
181:(
162:(
140:(
127:)
117:(
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.