347:
recommended deletion are very unconvincing and only justify their arguments based on easily correctible technicalities. I see bits and pieces about this game around the net and was hoping it could come to some coherence. The fact that some have expaned on it makes it worthwhile and that, in the end, was what I was hoping for. --
346:
Ok, maybe the title could be better, but I started this article and was hoping it could be expanded on. I am new to wikipedia and learning the ropes and hoping to make my own little contribution. Maybe I should study the protocols better but I stand by that this is a significant entry and those who
253:
conspiracy against to make us like soccer and techno music. I can assure you that any articles dealing with soccer get as much scrutiny as those
American football. I think those that disagree with us find this to be random trivia and/or a crappy article with a bad title. We think the article has
232:
as per JJay...this is what happens when non-Americans try to dictate what is important to
Americans...they try and delete things that are significant that they've never heard of....i bet there are plenty of soccer entries i could AFD using this criteria.
64:
Found during stubsorting. Not only is it a bad title, it's something that should be mentioned in the article on the teams involved. If the teams don't deserve articles the game doesn't either. I'm not sure if it can be
254:
merit. That is the only difference. I do think that there should be another name for the article, as the current title sounds a bit odd. However, we are all here to make wikipedia a better resource.
181:
108:
since this seems to have precipitated them dropping their football program, but it's already there. I doubt the article could be expanded further, so
188:. There does seem to be a faint consensus that non-routine, highly unusual or record-setting results are notable. This would count.
17:
205:
177:
400:
384:
368:
338:
322:
298:
278:
258:
237:
224:
212:
192:
164:
152:
140:
128:
116:
99:
80:
52:
58:
361:
418:
36:
417:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
270:
instead: some crazed cricket fans created articles for EVERY game in the
English league's season last year. --
69:
as I'm not aware of naming conventions for these sports teams, but if merging isn't an option, this should be
78:
184:
as to whether individual sports results are worthy of inclusion; no consensus appears to have been reached
208:. Ive seen this score cited a bazillion times in various formats. More than just a fact to be collected.
311:
105:
89:. Individual articles on football games notable only for extreme scorelines are not encyclopedic. --
149:
49:
381:
335:
294:
per
Smerdis. I'm normally against articles on regular-season games, but this event is famous. --
255:
209:
74:
94:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
319:
275:
348:
246:
365:
250:
45:
397:
295:
137:
113:
90:
315:
271:
189:
161:
125:
234:
306:. Nothing here. When there's enough material for even a halfway decent stub,
221:
267:
264:...there are plenty of soccer entries i could AFD using this criteria
148:
This can be mentioned on each teams' article page, if required. --
334:
per
Smerdis. Cumberland's page on the subject is quite amusing.--
411:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
360:
per
Smerdis - precedent already set with the articles in
245:. Remember to assume good faith here. I doubt its any
220:
and expand. Important in college football history. --
380:
per
Smerdis. Notable game in football history. --
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
421:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
362:Category:National Football League lore
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
44:The result of the debate was keep.
104:Was going to suggest Merging with
24:
206:Georgia Tech v. Cumberland, 1916
178:Georgia Tech v. Cumberland, 1916
59:Georgia Tech 222, Cumberland 0
1:
53:12:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
401:21:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
385:20:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
369:12:52, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
339:01:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
323:01:42, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
299:00:27, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
279:01:42, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
259:00:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
238:23:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
225:21:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
213:20:57, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
193:20:26, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
165:17:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
153:17:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
141:16:48, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
129:15:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
117:14:40, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
100:14:11, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
81:12:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
438:
414:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
312:Cumberland University
106:Cumberland University
310:break it out from
180:. There's been a
182:recent discussion
97:
429:
416:
95:
34:
437:
436:
432:
431:
430:
428:
427:
426:
425:
419:deletion review
412:
396:per Smerdis. --
247:New World Order
190:Smerdis of Tlön
136:per Squiddy. --
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
435:
433:
424:
423:
406:
404:
403:
387:
371:
351:
341:
325:
301:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
251:European Union
227:
215:
195:
167:
155:
150:(aeropagitica)
143:
131:
119:
102:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
434:
422:
420:
415:
409:
408:
407:
402:
399:
395:
391:
388:
386:
383:
382:FrankCostanza
379:
375:
372:
370:
367:
363:
359:
355:
352:
350:
345:
342:
340:
337:
336:SarekOfVulcan
333:
329:
326:
324:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
302:
300:
297:
293:
289:
286:
280:
277:
273:
269:
265:
262:
261:
260:
257:
256:Youngamerican
252:
248:
244:
241:
240:
239:
236:
231:
228:
226:
223:
219:
216:
214:
211:
210:Youngamerican
207:
203:
199:
196:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
166:
163:
159:
156:
154:
151:
147:
144:
142:
139:
135:
132:
130:
127:
124:per Squiddy.
123:
120:
118:
115:
111:
107:
103:
101:
98:
96:(squirt ink?)
92:
88:
85:
84:
83:
82:
79:
76:
72:
68:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
413:
410:
405:
393:
389:
377:
373:
357:
353:
343:
331:
327:
307:
303:
291:
287:
263:
242:
229:
217:
201:
197:
185:
173:
169:
157:
145:
133:
121:
109:
86:
70:
66:
63:
43:
31:
28:
349:MrMurph101
114:Wrathchild
366:Sam Vimes
186:generally
46:Johnleemk
398:Arcadian
296:Mwalcoff
138:kingboyk
268:cricket
243:Comment
91:Squiddy
71:deleted
316:Calton
304:Delete
272:Calton
158:Delete
146:Delete
134:Delete
126:Stifle
122:Delete
110:delete
87:Delete
67:merged
235:WillC
16:<
394:move
392:and
390:Keep
378:move
376:and
374:Keep
358:move
356:and
354:Keep
344:Keep
332:Move
330:and
328:Keep
320:Talk
314:. --
308:then
292:move
290:and
288:Keep
276:Talk
266:Try
230:KEEP
222:JJay
218:Keep
202:move
200:and
198:Keep
174:move
172:and
170:Keep
160:pa.
73:. -
50:Talk
204:to
176:to
162:Dan
75:Mgm
364:.
318:|
274:|
112:.
93:|
48:|
249:/
77:|
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.