Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Mohammed v. Donald Rumsfeld - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

203: 259:
For what it is worth the Grizwold article is still available online. I came across a new link to it just a couple of days ago. I would take the time to fix that reference, and add additional references to bring this article up to date -- if it weren't that a recent flood of
226:-- There have been a limited number of habeas corpus petitions filed on behalf of the captives in Bagram. It was very difficult for lawyers in the USA to learn the identities of the captives held in Bagram, but they succeeded in doing so a few times. For those who don't know, 252:
in Washington ruled that most Bagram captives were not eligible to access the US court system. They ruled that only those captives who were not captured in Afghanistan, and who were taken to Afghanistan by the USA were eligible to access the US court
293:
topic, Ghulam Mohammed v. Donald Rumsfeld, is notable. You state that "IMO the assertion that this topic is not notable is not supportable.", but I have shown that my searches showed a lack of evidence for your statement: it is up to you to
414:
writ. A wider topic (e.g. 'Jurisprudence on rights of war on terror suspects' or similar title) would almost certainly survive notability -- but would be a very different article from this one (which is mostly a large, unencyclopaedic,
161: 200: 256:
I have no problem merging the other habeas petitions from Bagram captives into a single article, and I suggest this now. IMO the assertion that this topic is not notable is not supportable.
155: 117: 90: 85: 94: 197: 77: 348: 176: 246:
commented that those habeas petitions would have a very significant effect if captives held in Bagram were given access to the US court system.
143: 323: 376:, I don't object, but there's no reason for hundreds of standalone articles about non-notable cases that need to be edited in parallel. 449: 432: 402: 385: 363: 335: 311: 279: 235: 217: 59: 17: 137: 133: 81: 183: 122: 73: 65: 464: 36: 426: 289:. It contains, as far as I can tell, no mention of this habeas corpus in its four pages. So please explain to us how 149: 463:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
372:. If Geo Swan wants to merge the information from this article into a more comprehensive article that meets 249: 299: 298:
that it is notable, not simply to state it, nor to claim some inherited notability from the parent topic
445: 169: 264: 359: 331: 275: 206: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
286: 270:
over articles or userspace pages I started simply does not allow me enough time to do so.
441: 398: 227: 416: 243: 239: 307: 213: 55: 373: 193: 381: 355: 327: 271: 111: 248:
Since this article has started there have been some significant developments. A
422: 394: 303: 209: 50: 377: 457:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
238:. There has been a significant amount of comment from 107: 103: 99: 168: 208:, all of them from Knowledge (XXG) and its mirrors. 182: 410:lack of substantive secondary source coverage on 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 467:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 440:The subject fails notability requirements.-- 343: 349:list of Law-related deletion discussions 347:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 322:This article has been nominated for 242:over those habeas petitions. Some 236:Bagram Theater Internment Facility 205:. Only thirty distinct Google hits 74:Ghulam Mohammed v. Donald Rumsfeld 66:Ghulam Mohammed v. Donald Rumsfeld 24: 1: 450:05:23, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 433:07:48, 24 November 2010 (UTC) 403:04:33, 24 November 2010 (UTC) 386:13:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 364:13:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 336:13:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 312:13:20, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 280:13:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 218:09:31, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 60:21:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC) 230:holds what has been called 484: 202:, or News Archives results 460:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 250:US District Court Judge 232:"the other Guantanamo" 393:as per nom and THF. 300:Bagram habeas corpi 196:. No Google Scholar 44:The result was 366: 352: 338: 475: 462: 431: 353: 318: 269: 263: 187: 186: 172: 125: 115: 97: 34: 483: 482: 478: 477: 476: 474: 473: 472: 471: 465:deletion review 458: 429: 420: 285:The article is 267: 261: 228:Bagram Air Base 129: 121: 88: 72: 69: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 481: 479: 470: 469: 453: 452: 435: 425: 405: 388: 367: 340: 339: 316: 315: 314: 190: 189: 126: 123:Afd statistics 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 480: 468: 466: 461: 455: 454: 451: 447: 443: 439: 436: 434: 430: 428: 424: 418: 413: 412:this specific 409: 406: 404: 400: 396: 392: 389: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 368: 365: 361: 357: 350: 346: 342: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 292: 288: 284: 283: 282: 281: 277: 273: 266: 257: 254: 251: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 222: 221: 220: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 185: 181: 178: 175: 171: 167: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 135: 132: 131:Find sources: 127: 124: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 459: 456: 437: 421: 411: 407: 390: 369: 344: 319: 295: 290: 258: 255: 247: 231: 223: 191: 179: 173: 165: 158: 152: 146: 140: 130: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 156:free images 442:Yachtsman1 419:table). 356:Geo Swan 328:Geo Swan 272:Geo Swan 118:View log 408:Delete: 253:system. 234:-- the 224:Comment 199:, Books 162:WP refs 150:scholar 91:protect 86:history 438:Delete 391:Delete 370:Delete 324:rescue 192:Fails 134:Google 95:delete 46:delete 427:Stalk 423:Hrafn 417:WP:OR 395:IQinn 320:Note: 244:WP:RS 240:WP:RS 177:JSTOR 138:books 120:) • 112:views 104:watch 100:links 48:. -- 16:< 446:talk 399:talk 382:talk 374:WP:N 360:talk 345:Note 332:talk 308:talk 304:Fram 296:show 291:this 287:here 276:talk 214:talk 210:Fram 194:WP:N 170:FENS 144:news 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 56:talk 51:Cirt 378:THF 302:. 265:xfd 184:TWL 116:– ( 448:) 401:) 384:) 362:) 351:. 334:) 326:. 310:) 278:) 268:}} 262:{{ 216:) 164:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 58:) 444:( 397:( 380:( 358:( 354:— 330:( 306:( 274:( 212:( 188:) 180:· 174:· 166:· 159:· 153:· 147:· 141:· 136:( 128:( 114:) 76:( 54:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Cirt
talk
21:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Ghulam Mohammed v. Donald Rumsfeld
Ghulam Mohammed v. Donald Rumsfeld
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Afd statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:N

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.