215:
mentions in passing and primary. 4 pages Case Study used and sold by some
Harvard courses doesn't impress me terribly, as it does not seem peer reviewed, but more like a form of academic self-publishing. Before someone points out to
219:, note that this is written by the company's employees. Bottom line, I don't think that being a subject of a non-peer reviewed for-profit Harvard case study makes this company notable, and I don't see any better sources.
172:
166:
239:
125:
265:
132:
204:
98:
93:
102:
85:
217:
208:
17:
187:
154:
293:
334:
40:
148:
315:
283:
257:
231:
67:
144:
89:
194:
81:
73:
53:
276:
250:
65:
203:
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing
330:
36:
212:
180:
160:
271:
245:
225:
58:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
329:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
309:
221:
119:
304:
323:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
296:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
115:
111:
107:
179:
302:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
193:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
337:). No further edits should be made to this page.
240:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
266:list of Illinois-related deletion discussions
8:
264:Note: This debate has been included in the
238:Note: This debate has been included in the
205:Knowledge (XXG):General notability guideline
263:
237:
211:requirement. The sources are the usuall
209:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (companies)
222:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
354:
316:00:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
68:02:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
284:14:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
258:14:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
232:13:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
326:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
207:and the more detailed
82:GhSMART & Company
74:GhSMART & Company
52:. Uncontested; see
318:
286:
260:
345:
328:
312:
307:
301:
299:
297:
281:
279:
274:
255:
253:
248:
228:
198:
197:
183:
135:
123:
105:
61:
34:
353:
352:
348:
347:
346:
344:
343:
342:
341:
335:deletion review
324:
319:
310:
305:
292:
290:
277:
272:
270:
251:
246:
244:
230:
226:
140:
131:
96:
80:
77:
59:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
351:
349:
340:
339:
300:
289:
288:
287:
261:
220:
201:
200:
137:
76:
71:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
350:
338:
336:
332:
327:
321:
320:
317:
314:
313:
308:
298:
295:
285:
282:
280:
275:
267:
262:
259:
256:
254:
249:
241:
236:
235:
234:
233:
229:
223:
218:
214:
210:
206:
196:
192:
189:
186:
182:
178:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
146:
143:
142:Find sources:
138:
134:
130:
127:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
75:
72:
70:
69:
66:
63:
62:
55:
54:WP:SOFTDELETE
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
325:
322:
303:
291:
273:CAPTAIN RAJU
269:
247:CAPTAIN RAJU
243:
202:
190:
184:
176:
169:
163:
157:
151:
141:
128:
60:Juliancolton
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
213:wP:CORPSPAM
167:free images
227:reply here
331:talk page
37:talk page
333:or in a
294:Relisted
126:View log
39:or in a
173:WP refs
161:scholar
99:protect
94:history
145:Google
103:delete
50:delete
188:JSTOR
149:books
133:Stats
120:views
112:watch
108:links
16:<
181:FENS
155:news
116:logs
90:talk
86:edit
56:. –
311:947
278:(✉)
252:(✉)
195:TWL
124:– (
268:.
242:.
175:)
118:|
114:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
64:|
306:J
224:|
199:)
191:·
185:·
177:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
147:(
139:(
136:)
129:·
122:)
84:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.