252:, with a score of 71%. The game author writes for the magazine sometimes so the review was probably placed as a favour (though it wasn't given a silly score of 98% or whatever, so I count that as perfectly OK for reliability). Game Tunnel does just review indie games, but I'm quite happy that their reviews are reliable and that a review from them provides some notability. It is an actual review rather than a selling piece, and GT does have reviewing standards overseen by the webmaster. If nothing else the PC Zone score can be cited to gamerankings and the GT review can also be used to write about the game's reception, and the development section can be written with gama sutra and self-references.
355:. It's at least somewhat notable as per above (direct reference to the PC Zone UK issue would be nice though), and after shortening the introduction and adding a section about its development (the fact it was created by only one person seems to be the most notable feature), I can see an adequate encyclopedic article. --
191:
about the game, it's in the
Independent Game Festival 2007. There's 3 things here - 1) the game itself, 2) the website and 3) the developer's lack of experience in developing games and the broader discussion about indie developers. There's various other sources kicking about which may or may not be
223:
has that issue, so we're a bit stuck with that. Gamasutra is certainly reliable, but I'm not sure about gametunnel.com, as it seems to be a site that specifically covers independent games. Whether that's an issue or not I'm not sure, but it seems that any "popular" independent game is going to be
270:
pending investigation into the magazine issue. Unavailability of a certain source to
Knowledge (XXG) editors at a certain time does not tell us anything about notability. The other sources look good.
290:- Dan Marshall did a series of development diaries for PC Zone. Gamasutra interview him about his entrance into the 2007 IGF competition, but the game wasn't shortlisted for any awards.
110:
220:
148:
371:
says are likely reliable, so away with this AfD. It would still be nice to see the PC Zone coverage referenced in the article though if anyone can do this.
367:
sorry, this escaped my watchlist somehow. Anyway, PC Zone seems to have featured it on more than one occasion, and there's the other web sources, which
192:
usable/up to this standard, but I'm pretty sure there's enough for the article about the game (with the level information chopped, blegh).
17:
278:
184:
408:
36:
339:
83:
78:
87:
407:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
70:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
224:
featured there whether or not it's covered by the mainstream gaming press. What do you reckon on that?
49:
368:
253:
204:
193:
390:
359:
324:
305:
282:
256:
243:
207:
196:
170:
140:
52:
291:
188:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
275:
180:
336:
297:
335:. Concur with previous comments about magazine and gaming media-in-general coverage. --
118:
374:
356:
302:
294:
249:
227:
217:
154:
124:
321:
74:
104:
315:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
271:
343:
66:
58:
203:
I've removed the massive laundry list of pop-culture references.
401:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
346:
100:
96:
92:
320:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
216:be wrong, as a search on the official PC Zone site
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
411:). No further edits should be made to this page.
219:yields no results. Unfortunately, no one on the
212:Ah, possible notability... However, ign's claim
179:Despite looking decidedly unpromising, I found
185:GameSpot list PC Zone UK as having reviewed it
8:
147:Note: This debate has been added to the
248:The PC Zone review is also listed at
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
391:18:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
360:16:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
325:03:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
306:18:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
283:20:54, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
257:10:09, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
244:17:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
208:13:16, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
197:12:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
171:22:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
149:list of video game deletions
141:22:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
53:19:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
428:
48:- Nomination Withdrawn.
404:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
365:Nomination withdrawn
187:(!?!) and there's a
181:a Game Tunnel review
327:
189:GamaSutra article
419:
406:
386:
383:
380:
377:
319:
317:
300:
239:
236:
233:
230:
221:Magazine project
173:
166:
163:
160:
157:
136:
133:
130:
127:
108:
90:
44:The result was
34:
427:
426:
422:
421:
420:
418:
417:
416:
415:
409:deletion review
402:
384:
381:
378:
375:
369:Someone another
313:
298:
254:Someone another
237:
234:
231:
228:
205:Someone another
194:Someone another
164:
161:
158:
155:
146:
134:
131:
128:
125:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
425:
423:
414:
413:
396:
394:
393:
362:
350:
329:
328:
318:
310:
309:
308:
285:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
200:
199:
174:
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
424:
412:
410:
405:
399:
398:
397:
392:
389:
388:
387:
370:
366:
363:
361:
358:
354:
351:
348:
345:
341:
338:
334:
331:
330:
326:
323:
316:
312:
311:
307:
304:
301:
296:
292:
289:
286:
284:
280:
277:
273:
269:
266:
265:
258:
255:
251:
247:
246:
245:
242:
241:
240:
222:
218:
215:
211:
210:
209:
206:
202:
201:
198:
195:
190:
186:
182:
178:
175:
172:
169:
168:
167:
150:
145:
144:
143:
142:
139:
138:
137:
120:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
403:
400:
395:
373:
372:
364:
352:
332:
314:
287:
267:
250:GameRankings
226:
225:
213:
176:
153:
152:
123:
122:
116:
45:
43:
31:
28:
272:User:Krator
50:Icestorm815
344:24 October
340:(contribs)
121:asserted.
119:notability
353:Weak keep
333:Weak keep
357:Allefant
111:View log
322:John254
84:protect
79:history
67:Gibbage
59:Gibbage
342:16:09
295:hahnch
88:delete
349:(GMT)
337:Gwern
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
347:2007
288:Keep
268:Keep
177:Keep
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
46:Keep
214:may
117:No
109:– (
385:re
382:ma
379:re
376:Mi
293:-
281:)
238:re
235:ma
232:re
229:Mi
183:,
165:re
162:ma
159:re
156:Mi
151:.
135:re
132:ma
129:re
126:Mi
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
303:n
299:e
279:c
276:t
274:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.