Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Gilles and Guy Leclerc - Knowledge

Source 📝

197:
Non-notable pair of scientist twin-brothers. Even if the claim to be "the first twin couples to meet through the Internet" is true (it is not substantiated by the references), I doubt that that would be a sufficient claim to notability. The references given are the faculty pages of the two brothers,
206:: both are assistant professors (who rarely meet our notability requirements) and the impact of their research for the moment is modest (Web of Science: for GM: 26 articles, h=9, total citations=329; for GJ: 18 articles, h=6, total citations=139). 166: 243: 362:. The twins marrying twins thing is essentially a single story, repeated in several newspapers; I don't think it rises to the level of notability. And there doesn't seem to be evidence of passing 160: 119: 223: 92: 87: 126: 96: 79: 181: 148: 270:
type of article, with little notability outside of the twin couples news bit. Or more like 4BLP1E. But the point is the same.
17: 198:
a newspaper item with an in-passing mention, and an item on an online site on twins (also in-passing mention). Does not meet
142: 375: 353: 324: 295: 279: 255: 235: 215: 61: 138: 394: 83: 40: 371: 188: 211: 75: 67: 275: 390: 320: 207: 57: 36: 349: 154: 367: 174: 271: 251: 231: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
389:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
316: 305: 291: 53: 345: 267: 363: 337: 203: 199: 340:. Their career and personal life similarities are interesting trivia, but not notable 247: 227: 113: 287: 308:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
336:. Assistant professors, neither of whom are individually notable under 286:
So where would you put the BLP1E article if not under this title? --
383:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
244:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
109: 105: 101: 173: 315:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 397:). No further edits should be made to this page. 187: 8: 242:Note: This debate has been included in the 224:list of Science-related deletion discussions 222:Note: This debate has been included in the 241: 221: 202:. As scientists, they also do not pass 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 376:20:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 354:15:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 325:15:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC) 296:20:56, 17 October 2012 (UTC) 280:20:38, 13 October 2012 (UTC) 256:01:31, 11 October 2012 (UTC) 236:01:31, 11 October 2012 (UTC) 216:12:33, 10 October 2012 (UTC) 62:13:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 344:, as the article suggests. 414: 266:This looks like a classic 386:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 76:Gilles and Guy Leclerc 68:Gilles and Guy Leclerc 48:The result was 327: 258: 238: 405: 388: 314: 310: 192: 191: 177: 129: 117: 99: 34: 413: 412: 408: 407: 406: 404: 403: 402: 401: 395:deletion review 384: 303: 134: 125: 90: 74: 71: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 411: 409: 400: 399: 379: 378: 368:David Eppstein 357: 330: 329: 328: 312: 311: 300: 299: 298: 283: 282: 260: 259: 239: 195: 194: 131: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 410: 398: 396: 392: 387: 381: 380: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 358: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 332: 331: 326: 322: 318: 313: 309: 307: 302: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 284: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 262: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 240: 237: 233: 229: 225: 220: 219: 218: 217: 213: 209: 208:Guillaume2303 205: 201: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 385: 382: 359: 341: 333: 304: 272:Sailsbystars 263: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 122: 49: 47: 31: 28: 317:Mark Arsten 161:free images 54:Mark Arsten 346:Agricola44 391:talk page 248:• Gene93k 228:• Gene93k 37:talk page 393:or in a 306:Relisted 268:WP:BLP1E 120:View log 39:or in a 364:WP:PROF 338:WP:PROF 204:WP:PROF 200:WP:NBIO 167:WP refs 155:scholar 93:protect 88:history 360:Delete 342:per se 334:Delete 288:Bejnar 264:Delete 139:Google 97:delete 50:delete 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 372:talk 350:talk 321:talk 292:talk 276:talk 252:talk 232:talk 212:talk 175:FENS 149:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 366:. — 189:TWL 118:– ( 374:) 352:) 323:) 294:) 278:) 254:) 246:. 234:) 226:. 214:) 169:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 52:. 370:( 356:. 348:( 319:( 290:( 274:( 250:( 230:( 210:( 193:) 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 133:( 130:) 123:· 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Mark Arsten
talk
13:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Gilles and Guy Leclerc
Gilles and Guy Leclerc
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:NBIO
WP:PROF

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.