80:
338:
though I'm usually in perfect agreement with
Bongomatic. The article is well-sourced, even though these references are local--but there is no requirement that they not be; the cow seems notable enough to me.
255:. WP:N doesn't and never has banned local coverage as examples of reliable sources establishing notability. Some people have issue that such a piece of folk art can be notable, but in fact it is. --
75:
68:
162:
273:
Lots of folk art is notable. But the exclusively local nature of the coverage—especially given the great length of time this artwork has been around—demonstrates that truly
147:
156:
114:
109:
118:
101:
17:
283:
234:
176:
54:
105:
367:
348:
324:
288:
264:
239:
219:
199:
181:
59:
382:
312:
36:
97:
89:
381:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
304:
252:
363:
210:(also all linked dictionaries) When something makes it into Russia, I trust is has reached notability.
170:
This article has been up for deletion twice before (but I don't know how to make that nice little box)
166:. The coverage cited is solely local. No evidence as to the notability of the topic has been offered.
359:
278:
229:
195:
171:
49:
320:
260:
215:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
344:
295:
251:- It is the in-depth subject of multiple independent reliable sources, the core criteria of
191:
308:
307:
to be changed to not accept "local" secondary sources that are independent of topics as
316:
256:
211:
135:
48:
Withdrawn by nominator until consensus about solely local coverage comes his way.
358:
a piece of artwork wich has reached notability. Also a very interesting article.
340:
208:
228:
I hope this is a joke. This reference is to a
Knowledge (XXG) mirror site.
163:
literally zero hits when searching for the artist and the name of the cow
154:
The topic of this (charming and whimsical) article is non-notable. A
375:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
81:
Articles for deletion/Gladys the Swiss Dairy Cow (2 nomination)
142:
131:
127:
123:
315:, not try to push an agenda in an individual AfD.--
160:finds nothing relevant to the cow, and, gnerates
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
385:). No further edits should be made to this page.
76:Articles for deletion/Gladys the Swiss Dairy Cow
69:Articles for deletion/Gladys the swiss Dairy Cow
277:coverage doesn't exist. See footnotes 5 and 6.
303:of Glady the Swiss Dairy Cow. If you'd like
8:
293:Not sure where you're going with that. The
157:Google news archive search for the artist
311:then you need to make your case in the
73:
66:
207:Even makes into a Russian reference!
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
65:
24:
1:
402:
98:Gladys the Swiss Dairy Cow
90:Gladys the Swiss Dairy Cow
368:23:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
349:19:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
325:17:06, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
289:16:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
265:16:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
240:15:11, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
220:15:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
200:14:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
190:...seems sourced to me...
182:13:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
60:03:55, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
378:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
64:AfDs for this article:
393:
380:
309:reliable sources
296:Connecticut Post
286:
281:
237:
232:
179:
174:
165:
159:
145:
139:
121:
57:
52:
44:The result was
34:
401:
400:
396:
395:
394:
392:
391:
390:
389:
383:deletion review
376:
284:
279:
235:
230:
177:
172:
161:
155:
141:
112:
96:
93:
86:
55:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
399:
397:
388:
387:
371:
370:
352:
351:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
313:WP:N talk page
268:
267:
245:
244:
243:
242:
223:
222:
202:
152:
151:
92:
87:
85:
84:
83:
78:
72:
71:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
398:
386:
384:
379:
373:
372:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
353:
350:
346:
342:
337:
334:
333:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
305:WP:NOTABILITY
302:
298:
297:
292:
291:
290:
287:
282:
276:
272:
271:
270:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:WP:NOTABILITY
250:
247:
246:
241:
238:
233:
227:
226:
225:
224:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
201:
197:
193:
189:
186:
185:
184:
183:
180:
175:
169:
164:
158:
149:
144:
137:
133:
129:
125:
120:
116:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:
91:
88:
82:
79:
77:
74:
70:
67:
62:
61:
58:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
377:
374:
355:
335:
300:
294:
274:
248:
204:
187:
167:
153:
45:
43:
31:
28:
301:independent
275:independent
360:Warrington
192:Rhinoracer
299:is truly
188:Weak Keep
317:Oakshade
257:Oakshade
148:View log
212:Collect
115:protect
110:history
341:Drmies
143:delete
119:delete
285:matic
280:Bongo
236:matic
231:Bongo
178:matic
173:Bongo
168:Note:
146:) – (
136:views
128:watch
124:links
56:matic
51:Bongo
46:keep.
16:<
364:talk
356:Keep
345:talk
336:Keep
321:talk
261:talk
249:Keep
216:talk
205:Keep
196:talk
132:logs
106:talk
102:edit
366:)
347:)
323:)
263:)
218:)
198:)
134:|
130:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
362:(
343:(
319:(
259:(
214:(
194:(
150:)
140:(
138:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.