637:
I'll elaborate and note that in my experience, a common counter to our objection is for the defenders to present a discussion of the sources and tell us why they are reliable. This has not happened, we still know very little about the sources other than they look rather unreliable based on the
52:
to delete. There is no consensus below as to whether the sources in the article are sufficient to support notability under the GNG or not. If better sources do not appear in the near future a subsequent nomination at AfD may be reasonable.
346:
While I am not certain if the magazine is non-notable in reality, I am sure its current form on pl-wiki does not satisfy the credibility¬ability criteria, so it should not be used as an argument for keeping this article.
159:
324:
306:
I'd feel more confient in that after AfDing that article on pl wiki, which I may do. A specialized regional fashion magazine with a claim of 15,000 publication volume, using only one self-ref... --
120:
368:
Please note that the discussion here is not about the magazine (which does not have its en wiki entry), but about a biography which uses the said magazine as one of its sources. --
541:
Maybe fashion blogging in Poland is more notable/encyclopedic than
Glamourina's individual contribution. Could an editor develop such aspect and redirect the current article?
240:
218:
659:
Can you please check the references as they are now? They changed quite a bit since the day you first PRODded it, on
November 10, and I believe the article now meets
153:
198:. As at least one editor seems to disagree with the proposed prod, I think we need a wider community discussion on whether this person is notable or not.
389:
As I wrote above, the pl-wiki article on the magazine cannot be used as an argument to keep the article about the person. If it was unclear, sorry ;)
737:
17:
93:
88:
97:
174:
779:
141:
40:
731:
80:
194:, this article has serious issues with notability (a blogger), and reliability of sources is poor (blogs, etc. - see
754:- the sources look good to me, might need a bit more of clean up. person is notable in the polish fashion industry.
761:
195:
191:
135:
723:
775:
755:
36:
283:
131:
743:
698:
677:
650:
628:
603:
582:
552:
531:
514:
483:
466:
445:
401:
380:
359:
339:
318:
297:
274:
254:
232:
210:
62:
58:
549:
294:
167:
417:
181:
462:
686:
I checked. Yes, they are nicely formatted, but can you tell me how any of them are reliable? --
692:
644:
597:
525:
479:
428:
374:
333:
312:
270:
250:
228:
204:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
774:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
623:
396:
354:
660:
613:
565:
561:
494:
674:
579:
84:
54:
616:, because it DOES NOT demonstrate "significant coverage in independent reliable sources"
147:
545:
507:
290:
458:
591:
A concern is that the sources are not reliable (blogs, self-published, and such). --
568:) because it demonstrates "significant coverage in independent reliable sources". --
688:
640:
593:
521:
475:
370:
329:
308:
266:
246:
224:
200:
114:
617:
390:
348:
666:
571:
76:
68:
420:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
500:
325:
pl:Knowledge (XXG):Poczekalnia/artykuły/2011:11:21:Miasto kobiet (magazyn)
638:(little) info present in the article (mostly unknown websites linked). --
768:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
323:
For the record, I nominated the magazine for AfD at pl wiki (
497:, and the article appears to be neutral and appropriate.
110:
106:
102:
457:
this article about a completely non-notable person. -
166:
427:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
180:
474:- per nom; I assume that Piotrus can read Polish.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
782:). No further edits should be made to this page.
192:Wikipedia_talk:POLAND#Prod_proposal:_Glamourina
8:
241:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
239:Note: This debate has been included in the
219:list of Fashion-related deletion discussions
217:Note: This debate has been included in the
718:- my grasp of Polish is extremely limited
493:I believe there is enough here to satisfy
238:
216:
722:... yes, I'd say there's enough there.
689:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
641:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
612:Second: it clearly DOES NOT meet the
594:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
522:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
371:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
330:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
309:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
265:- I don't know, I can't read Polish.
201:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
286:seems to be a newspaper of record.
24:
1:
744:16:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
699:17:54, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
678:06:34, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
651:01:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
629:00:54, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
604:00:40, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
583:22:47, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
553:07:02, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
532:18:29, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
515:23:30, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
484:21:58, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
467:19:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
446:02:01, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
402:20:38, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
381:00:45, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
360:03:56, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
340:00:45, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
319:23:47, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
298:13:55, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
275:20:36, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
255:00:37, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
233:00:37, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
211:19:10, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
63:05:01, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
519:Can you define "enough"? --
799:
771:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
562:notability requirements
560:It clearly meets the
48:The result was
676:
581:
513:
448:
257:
244:
235:
222:
790:
773:
758:
757:Americanpatriot1
734:
728:
695:
673:
671:
664:
647:
626:
620:
600:
578:
576:
569:
551:
528:
512:
510:
504:
498:
443:
426:
422:
399:
393:
377:
357:
351:
336:
315:
296:
245:
223:
207:
185:
184:
170:
118:
100:
34:
798:
797:
793:
792:
791:
789:
788:
787:
786:
780:deletion review
769:
756:
732:
724:
697:
693:
667:
665:
649:
645:
624:
618:
602:
598:
572:
570:
564:(specifically,
542:
530:
526:
508:
502:
499:
439:
435:
429:
415:
397:
391:
379:
375:
355:
349:
338:
334:
317:
313:
287:
209:
205:
127:
91:
75:
72:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
796:
794:
785:
784:
764:
763:
747:
746:
712:
711:
710:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
687:
681:
680:
654:
653:
639:
632:
631:
607:
606:
592:
586:
585:
555:
536:
535:
534:
520:
487:
486:
469:
451:
450:
449:
437:
433:
424:
423:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
384:
383:
369:
363:
362:
344:
343:
342:
328:
307:
301:
300:
277:
259:
258:
236:
199:
196:WP:BOMBARDMENT
188:
187:
124:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
795:
783:
781:
777:
772:
766:
765:
762:
759:
753:
749:
748:
745:
741:
740:
735:
729:
727:
721:
717:
714:
713:
700:
696:
690:
685:
684:
683:
682:
679:
675:
672:
670:
662:
658:
657:
656:
655:
652:
648:
642:
636:
635:
634:
633:
630:
627:
621:
615:
611:
610:
609:
608:
605:
601:
595:
590:
589:
588:
587:
584:
580:
577:
575:
567:
563:
559:
556:
554:
550:
548:
547:
540:
537:
533:
529:
523:
518:
517:
516:
511:
506:
505:
496:
492:
489:
488:
485:
481:
477:
473:
470:
468:
464:
460:
456:
453:
452:
447:
444:
442:
441:
440:
425:
421:
419:
414:
413:
403:
400:
394:
388:
387:
386:
385:
382:
378:
372:
367:
366:
365:
364:
361:
358:
352:
345:
341:
337:
331:
326:
322:
321:
320:
316:
310:
305:
304:
303:
302:
299:
295:
293:
292:
285:
284:Miasto kobiet
281:
278:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
242:
237:
234:
230:
226:
220:
215:
214:
213:
212:
208:
202:
197:
193:
183:
179:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
133:
130:
129:Find sources:
125:
122:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
70:
67:
65:
64:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
770:
767:
751:
738:
725:
719:
715:
668:
573:
557:
544:
538:
501:
490:
471:
454:
432:
431:
430:
416:
289:
279:
262:
190:As noted at
189:
177:
171:
163:
156:
150:
144:
138:
128:
50:No Consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
154:free images
694:talk to me
646:talk to me
599:talk to me
527:talk to me
436:rbitrarily
376:talk to me
335:talk to me
314:talk to me
206:talk to me
77:Glamourina
69:Glamourina
55:Eluchil404
776:talk page
669:★ Pikks ★
574:★ Pikks ★
546:Racconish
291:Racconish
247:• Gene93k
225:• Gene93k
37:talk page
778:or in a
459:Darwinek
418:Relisted
121:View log
39:or in a
539:Comment
476:Bearian
280:Comment
267:Bearian
263:Comment
160:WP refs
148:scholar
94:protect
89:history
739:stalk!
661:WP:GNG
619:Pundit
566:WP:BIO
472:Delete
455:Delete
392:Pundit
350:Pundit
132:Google
98:delete
726:Pesky
625:utter
503:Chzz
398:utter
356:utter
327:). --
175:JSTOR
136:books
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
752:Keep
733:talk
716:Keep
558:Keep
491:Keep
480:talk
463:talk
271:talk
251:talk
229:talk
168:FENS
142:news
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
59:talk
720:but
614:GNG
495:GNG
182:TWL
119:– (
742:)
663:--
543:—
509:►
482:)
465:)
288:—
282:-
273:)
253:)
243:.
231:)
221:.
162:)
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
61:)
760:|
750:'
736:…
730:(
691:|
643:|
622:|
596:|
524:|
478:(
461:(
438:0
434:A
395:|
373:|
353:|
332:|
311:|
269:(
249:(
227:(
203:|
186:)
178:·
172:·
164:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
134:(
126:(
123:)
117:)
79:(
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.