Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Glass books - Knowledge

Source 📝

72:. It might seem advisable to turn this into an article about the novel, but that would amount to a complete rewrite (besides, I can't do it since there are not that many sources about the novel, either). Thus, 137:
as per above; should the book make it as notable in itself (rather than beig promoted here by the publisher) then it should be in that article. Personally, I'd have speedied it as, well, spam! --
121:
to the book if the book gets an article by the end of this AFD (and that's highly questionable unless and until there's third-party evidence anyone cares), else
17: 61: 167: 36: 166:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
102:
Merge with the book if that article is created, else delete. Possibly self-promotion by the publisher. See
93:. Items within a work of fiction should not have their own article if the work itself does not have one. -- 150: 141: 129: 113: 97: 80: 48: 106:- "A wider online presence is also being created for the book, using Google Earth, Knowledge, ...". 94: 103: 54: 60:
Fictional objects from a novel published in August 2006. While the novel is doing rather well (
147: 126: 45: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
110: 90: 65: 138: 69: 107: 44:
The result wasThe nominated article was Speedied as spam from the publisher -
77: 68:
enough for their own article, especially as there is a severe lack of
160:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
146:
You are in fact entirely correct. I've killed it. -
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 170:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 64:), the Glass Books themselves are not 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 151:16:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 142:16:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 130:15:17, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 114:15:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 98:14:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 81:13:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 49:16:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 1: 62:Amazon sales rank ca. 4,500 187: 163:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 104:this wikimediauk-l post 178: 165: 70:reliable sources 34: 186: 185: 181: 180: 179: 177: 176: 175: 174: 168:deletion review 161: 58: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 184: 182: 173: 172: 156: 155: 154: 153: 132: 116: 100: 95:Metropolitan90 57: 52: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 183: 171: 169: 164: 158: 157: 152: 149: 145: 144: 143: 140: 136: 133: 131: 128: 124: 120: 117: 115: 112: 109: 105: 101: 99: 96: 92: 88: 85: 84: 83: 82: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 56: 53: 51: 50: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 162: 159: 148:David Gerard 134: 127:David Gerard 122: 118: 86: 73: 59: 46:David Gerard 43: 31: 28: 55:Glass books 119:Redirect 139:AlisonW 91:WP:FICT 66:notable 135:Delete 123:delete 108:Angela 87:Delete 74:delete 16:< 89:per 78:Huon 125:- 76:. 111:.

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
David Gerard
16:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Glass books
Amazon sales rank ca. 4,500
notable
reliable sources
Huon
13:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
WP:FICT
Metropolitan90
14:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
this wikimediauk-l post
Angela
.
15:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
David Gerard
15:17, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
AlisonW
16:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
David Gerard
16:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
deletion review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.