260:? If so, I have to disagree. There are a few news articles about the company's fights with other companies, but the rest seems to be sourced from the company's website and at least one blog that doesn't even mention the subject. Having done a search of my own, I couldn't find much by way of
311:
sources out there that could be used to replace the inadequate ones currently used in the article. Many of them still seem to be about the entrepreneur that owns the company, rather than the company itself, but in amongst that there is enough to convince me. Just. Have changed my note.
272:
to do with the subject. I'd like to think they were mistakes rather than a deliberate attempt to mislead, but they are not worth keeping there either way. Without more in depth coverage, I can't see how the subject passes
181:
268:. The sources attached to the article were horrible and some links weren't even the articles they claimed to be. I've removed a couple of deadlinks and a few that went nowhere or to articles that had
336:
175:
423:
367:
134:
141:
107:
102:
111:
94:
17:
196:
163:
422:
had been checked the news section on Google turns up 5 years worth of RSes, including interviews. From the
Independent.
53:
384:
353:
70:
459:
40:
157:
436:
429:
426:
406:
440:
431:
It meets GNG because of these sources. While they may not be cited right now, they can easily be included.
410:
390:
359:
325:
294:
239:
221:
153:
76:
235:
455:
318:
287:
217:
36:
203:
432:
304:
278:
189:
98:
402:
231:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
454:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
419:
313:
282:
261:
213:
169:
212:
Seems a Soap for glasses direct - content is completely written in advertisement style.
379:
348:
90:
82:
65:
274:
265:
128:
257:
372:
341:
58:
281:. More than willing to be convinced, so please post anything you can find.
307:
has now done exactly that, sufficiently enough to demonstrate there
448:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
230:
The article appears notable. It appears it can be salvaged.
124:
120:
116:
188:
337:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
462:). No further edits should be made to this page.
368:list of Business-related deletion discussions
202:
8:
428:and even coverage of its award as a startup.
366:Note: This debate has been included in the
335:Note: This debate has been included in the
401:because I doubt it is a notable company.
365:
334:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
479:
451:Please do not modify it.
441:02:54, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
411:18:41, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
391:04:51, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
360:04:51, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
326:05:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
295:02:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
240:20:05, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
222:19:21, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
77:22:44, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
262:significant coverage
252:- do you mean the
48:The result was
393:
362:
54:non-admin closure
470:
453:
389:
387:
382:
377:
358:
356:
351:
346:
322:
291:
266:reliable sources
207:
206:
192:
144:
132:
114:
75:
73:
68:
63:
34:
478:
477:
473:
472:
471:
469:
468:
467:
466:
460:deletion review
449:
385:
380:
373:
371:
354:
349:
342:
340:
320:
289:
149:
140:
105:
89:
86:
71:
66:
59:
57:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
476:
474:
465:
464:
444:
443:
433:ChrisGualtieri
413:
395:
394:
363:
331:
330:
329:
328:
305:ChrisGualtieri
298:
297:
256:appears to be
242:
210:
209:
146:
91:Glasses Direct
85:
83:Glasses Direct
80:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
475:
463:
461:
457:
452:
446:
445:
442:
438:
434:
430:
427:
424:
421:
417:
414:
412:
408:
404:
403:Peterkingiron
400:
397:
396:
392:
388:
383:
378:
376:
369:
364:
361:
357:
352:
347:
345:
338:
333:
332:
327:
324:
323:
317:
316:
310:
306:
302:
301:
300:
299:
296:
293:
292:
286:
285:
280:
276:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
250:
246:
243:
241:
237:
233:
229:
226:
225:
224:
223:
219:
215:
205:
201:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
152:
151:Find sources:
147:
143:
139:
136:
130:
126:
122:
118:
113:
109:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
87:
84:
81:
79:
78:
74:
69:
64:
62:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
450:
447:
415:
398:
374:
343:
319:
314:
308:
288:
283:
279:WP:CORPDEPTH
269:
264:in multiple
253:
248:
247:
244:
232:Citrusbowler
227:
211:
199:
193:
185:
178:
172:
166:
160:
150:
137:
60:
49:
47:
31:
28:
425:to Skynews
399:Weak delete
249:Weak delete
176:free images
456:talk page
420:WP:BEFORE
245:Weak keep
37:talk page
458:or in a
315:Stalwart
284:Stalwart
135:View log
39:or in a
270:nothing
258:notable
254:subject
182:WP refs
170:scholar
108:protect
103:history
275:WP:GNG
154:Google
112:delete
418:- If
197:JSTOR
158:books
142:Stats
129:views
121:watch
117:links
16:<
437:talk
416:Keep
407:talk
375:czar
344:czar
303:And
236:talk
228:Keep
218:talk
214:Amit
190:FENS
164:news
125:logs
99:talk
95:edit
61:czar
50:keep
321:111
309:are
290:111
277:or
204:TWL
133:– (
52:. (
439:)
409:)
370:.
339:.
238:)
220:)
184:)
127:|
123:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
56:)
435:(
405:(
386:·
381:·
355:·
350:·
234:(
216:(
208:)
200:·
194:·
186:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
156:(
148:(
145:)
138:·
131:)
93:(
72:·
67:·
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.