619:
ten-line-long ad page; the MIT Tech Review piece and ZDnet piece are talking about the Google Glass and its early restrictions/launch procedures, not the
Glasshole neologism; the Forbes author writes about his experience and personal opinions on the Glass, where the only mention is a link pointing to the Urban Dictionary entry; and the NewStatesman piece talks about the wider implications of technology giants and engineers running the world, not this glasshole neologism. The point is, anyone can do a cherry-picked Google search for "glasshole" and find sources that mention the term, but that doesn't mean it's the main topic of discussion or that it's notable enough to merit its own article.
206:) rather than the term itself. The sources present in the article so far don't show any substantial evidence of notability beyond a trivial coinage and its apparent "trending" usage. Among the 4 sources cited, SFChronicle gives around ten lines of "pop culture"-style commentary, and the other three sources seem to op-ed type sources commenting on the Google Glass rather than the term. One source, the
210:
is misleading as the title gives the assumption that linguists have specifically analyzed the neologism, "glasshole", but they haven't, and the article goes on a ramble about an individual linguist's commentary on the term "asshole", and misleadingly associates that individual's commentary with this
618:
Half of the sources you cite don't specifically talk about the "glasshole" neologism, which is by far not the main topic of discussion or relevance/importance in those blog-style opinion pieces. Specifically, as I pointed out above, the SFChronicle is not a reliable source as it's essentially a
692:
notable. The sources also seem to differ wildly on what the term seems to mean, so a lot of it seems to be an attempt at using a clever wording to increase page hits rather than an actual term with any consistent meaning. -
716:
the term (not just using the term) to justify a stand-alone article. The term would make a perfectly good redirect, though, and there is some material in there worth saving, so I don't see a need for deletion outright. —
171:
202:
Appears to be a non-notable neologism coined in Urban
Dictionary, and stub doesn't contain enough reliable sources to establish notability on the neologism beyond commentary about a wider topic (
267:
124:
431:
165:
574:
459:
743:
if it is ever started. This is a bad name for an encyclopedic topic, what could be said about "glasshole" that would not fit better in a putative
211:
neologism. In any case, what essentially amounts to 3 sources that mention the topic is not enough to establish notability on this neologism. -
524:
131:
305:. This article is just a dictionary definition, while the main article discusses the topic of people behaving like assholes/illegally. --
207:
17:
228:
Update: also doesn't provide enough new/notable content to warrant an article. This will only end up being a perma-stub. -
97:
92:
186:
101:
153:
546:
487:
284:
84:
792:
769:
744:
40:
620:
464:
395:
310:
254:
147:
657:
788:
720:
674:
249:
neologism with very weak sources, so not notable either, and in any case
Knowledge is not a dictionary.
36:
520:
143:
765:
773:
756:
727:
700:
678:
661:
632:
624:
609:
372:
364:
350:
314:
290:
258:
237:
229:
220:
212:
66:
697:
628:
368:
233:
216:
179:
306:
250:
193:
60:
669:
until/unless there's evidence that the neologism catches on beyond a couple mentions on blogs.
653:
604:
432:"Google Glass Bid Up To $ 95,300 On eBay Before Seller Realized He Isn't Allowed To Sell Them"
403:
360:
356:
345:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
787:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
355:
Call it whatever you'd like, but the removal has already been discussed and justified in the
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
670:
521:""Glassholes" Only, Please Why is Google restricting its Glass rollout to rich tech elites?"
752:
498:
694:
279:
159:
88:
460:"There's A New Word To Describe Inconsiderate Google Glass Users: 'Glassholes' (GOOG)"
689:
649:
579:
551:
411:
407:
387:
57:
740:
736:
709:
645:
599:
340:
324:
302:
203:
51:
118:
575:"No, you can't jam Glassholes; Google's Eric Schmidt calls for Glasses etiquette"
748:
272:
80:
72:
688:- A few instances of usage in blogs, even reliable blogs, does not make a
436:
391:
492:
399:
781:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
359:. You have no valid reasons for adding it to the article beyond
323:
This info has been repeatedly censored out of the main article,
621:
Knowledge is not for dictionary-type entries such as this one
337:
334:
331:
328:
114:
110:
106:
178:
488:"Google Glass and the emerging Glasshole culture"
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
795:). No further edits should be made to this page.
268:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
192:
8:
547:"What happens when engineers run the world?"
266:Note: This debate has been included in the
712:. I'm not yet seeing the level of coverage
265:
414:. Hardly weak sources by any definition.
422:
545:Chakrabortty, Aditya (9 April 2013).
525:Massachusetts Institute of Technology
7:
24:
519:Pavlus, John (21 February 2013).
339:It is no longer discussed there.
573:Storm, Darlene (22 April 2013).
430:Hill, Kashmir (17 April 2013).
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
390:with the coverage and use in
1:
458:Bort, Julie (15 April 2013).
812:
701:06:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
679:05:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
662:08:31, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
633:05:23, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
610:14:46, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
373:05:28, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
351:16:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
315:10:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
291:08:47, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
259:07:57, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
238:05:21, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
221:06:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
745:Criticism of Google Glass
784:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
774:17:00, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
757:15:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
728:13:10, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
465:San Francisco Chronicle
396:San Francisco Chronicle
67:20:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
764:as not encyclopedic.
741:Google Glass#Criticism
737:Google Glass#Reception
710:Google Glass#Reception
303:Google Glass#Reception
52:Google Glass#Reception
404:MIT Technology Review
208:Atlantic Wire source
642:Merge and redircet
48:The result was
608:
349:
293:
803:
786:
723:
722:Mr. Stradivarius
602:
592:
591:
589:
587:
570:
564:
563:
561:
559:
542:
536:
535:
533:
531:
516:
510:
509:
507:
505:
483:
477:
476:
474:
472:
455:
449:
448:
446:
444:
427:
343:
289:
287:
282:
277:
197:
196:
182:
134:
122:
104:
63:
34:
811:
810:
806:
805:
804:
802:
801:
800:
799:
793:deletion review
782:
766:Robert McClenon
721:
596:
595:
585:
583:
572:
571:
567:
557:
555:
544:
543:
539:
529:
527:
518:
517:
513:
503:
501:
499:CBS Interactive
486:Perlow, Jason.
485:
484:
480:
470:
468:
457:
456:
452:
442:
440:
429:
428:
424:
394:Magazine, the
386:: Easily meets
285:
280:
273:
271:
139:
130:
95:
79:
76:
61:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
809:
807:
798:
797:
777:
776:
759:
730:
703:
682:
681:
664:
638:
637:
636:
635:
613:
612:
594:
593:
565:
537:
511:
478:
450:
421:
417:
416:
415:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
327:by M0rphzone.
318:
317:
295:
294:
262:
261:
243:
242:
241:
240:
200:
199:
136:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
808:
796:
794:
790:
785:
779:
778:
775:
771:
767:
763:
760:
758:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
731:
729:
726:
725:
724:
715:
711:
707:
704:
702:
699:
696:
691:
687:
684:
683:
680:
676:
672:
668:
665:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
640:
639:
634:
630:
626:
622:
617:
616:
615:
614:
611:
606:
601:
598:
597:
582:
581:
580:Computerworld
576:
569:
566:
554:
553:
552:New Statesman
548:
541:
538:
526:
522:
515:
512:
500:
496:
494:
489:
482:
479:
467:
466:
461:
454:
451:
439:
438:
433:
426:
423:
420:
413:
412:Computerworld
409:
408:New Statesman
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
382:
381:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
353:
352:
347:
342:
338:
335:
332:
329:
326:
322:
321:
320:
319:
316:
312:
308:
307:Colapeninsula
304:
300:
297:
296:
292:
288:
283:
278:
276:
269:
264:
263:
260:
256:
252:
251:Chiswick Chap
248:
245:
244:
239:
235:
231:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
209:
205:
195:
191:
188:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
145:
142:
141:Find sources:
137:
133:
129:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
65:
64:
59:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
783:
780:
761:
732:
719:
718:
713:
705:
685:
666:
654:Stuartyeates
646:Google Glass
641:
584:. Retrieved
578:
568:
556:. Retrieved
550:
540:
528:. Retrieved
514:
502:. Retrieved
495:Tech Broiler
491:
481:
469:. Retrieved
463:
453:
441:. Retrieved
435:
425:
418:
383:
325:Google Glass
298:
274:
246:
204:Google Glass
201:
189:
183:
175:
168:
162:
156:
150:
140:
127:
56:
49:
47:
31:
28:
747:article? --
671:polarscribe
166:free images
419:References
361:WP:ILIKEIT
789:talk page
690:neologism
625:M0rphzone
365:M0rphzone
357:talk page
230:M0rphzone
213:M0rphzone
81:Glasshole
73:Glasshole
50:merge to
37:talk page
791:or in a
586:25 April
558:25 April
530:25 April
504:24 April
471:17 April
443:25 April
299:Redirect
125:View log
39:or in a
648:as per
600:Toddst1
341:Toddst1
172:WP refs
160:scholar
98:protect
93:history
62:Faraone
762:Delete
686:Delete
667:Delete
650:WP:NEO
437:Forbes
402:, the
392:Forbes
388:WP:GNG
247:Delete
144:Google
102:delete
749:A3 nm
733:Merge
714:about
706:Merge
698:Ghost
493:ZDnet
400:ZDnet
187:JSTOR
148:books
132:Stats
119:views
111:watch
107:links
16:<
770:talk
753:talk
695:Sudo
675:talk
658:talk
629:talk
623:. -
605:talk
588:2013
560:2013
532:2013
506:2013
473:2013
445:2013
410:and
406:the
384:Keep
369:talk
363:. -
346:talk
311:talk
275:czar
255:talk
234:talk
217:talk
180:FENS
154:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
739:or
735:to
708:to
644:to
301:to
194:TWL
123:– (
772:)
755:)
677:)
660:)
652:.
631:)
577:.
549:.
523:.
497:.
490:.
462:.
434:.
398:,
371:)
336:,
330:,
313:)
270:.
257:)
236:)
219:)
174:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
55:.
768:(
751:(
673:(
656:(
627:(
607:)
603:(
590:.
562:.
534:.
508:.
475:.
447:.
367:(
348:)
344:(
333:,
309:(
286:·
281:·
253:(
232:(
215:(
198:)
190:·
184:·
176:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
146:(
138:(
135:)
128:·
121:)
83:(
58:L
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.