417:. If an object is in a catalog of interest to amateur astronomers then it likely passes NASTRO. Catalogs of interest to professionals don't count in this regard. I downloaded the two papers cited in this article, and Gliese 167 was not singled out for any special coverage or investigation. It was studied along with 225 other stars in the first paper, and with 152 other stars in the second paper. No singular coverage was given, so no evidence of notability is presented here. Waving your arms and saying
374:
page and it said if it is found in catalogues it is worth including. The sources seem to suggest it is included and of some interest. Admittedly, I may be misinterpreting the guideline, but a star seems worth keeping. Do we know when and who discovered it? Is it observable with the naked eye?
166:
425:
is clear that notability isn't inherited, so distance is irrelevant, and the consensus from WikiProject
Astronomical Objects is that a distance cutoff for notability isn't necessary. Cheers,
119:
222:
160:
126:
210:
17:
304:
Deletionists will all die, but Gliese 167 will still be there. Seriously, it's useful information, I needed to look this up today.
92:
87:
96:
181:
453:
148:
40:
380:
79:
401:
206:
142:
376:
418:
449:
245:
226:
57:
36:
138:
434:
405:
384:
358:
313:
293:
249:
229:
214:
61:
397:
202:
174:
422:
414:
371:
324:
259:
198:
188:
430:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
448:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
241:
53:
355:
309:
290:
83:
154:
426:
113:
393:
336:
305:
271:
75:
67:
327:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
262:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
396:. It's only 43 ly away, which makes it quite close , as these things go.
442:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
413:
into appropriate list. The users above are misinterpreting
52:. Discussion about merger can take place at talk page. —
109:
105:
101:
173:
334:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
269:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
456:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
223:list of Science-related deletion discussions
221:Note: This debate has been included in the
220:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
62:07:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
435:13:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
406:10:36, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
385:01:27, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
359:00:32, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
314:13:54, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
294:05:58, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
250:01:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
230:17:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
215:17:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
473:
445:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
197:Doesn't seem to meet
421:isn't an argument.
48:The result was
377:Candleabracadabra
361:
296:
232:
464:
447:
357:
352:
349:
346:
343:
340:
333:
329:
292:
287:
284:
281:
278:
275:
268:
264:
240:: fails WP:GNG.
227:Northamerica1000
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
472:
471:
467:
466:
465:
463:
462:
461:
460:
454:deletion review
443:
350:
347:
344:
341:
338:
335:
322:
285:
282:
279:
276:
273:
270:
257:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
470:
468:
459:
458:
438:
437:
408:
387:
364:
363:
362:
331:
330:
319:
318:
317:
316:
298:
297:
266:
265:
254:
253:
252:
234:
233:
203:StringTheory11
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
469:
457:
455:
451:
446:
440:
439:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
409:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
388:
386:
382:
378:
373:
369:
366:
365:
360:
356:
354:
353:
332:
328:
326:
321:
320:
315:
311:
307:
303:
300:
299:
295:
291:
289:
288:
267:
263:
261:
256:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
236:
235:
231:
228:
224:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
444:
441:
419:it is useful
410:
389:
367:
337:
323:
301:
272:
258:
237:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
370:I read the
242:Praemonitus
161:free images
54:Crisco 1492
76:Gliese 167
68:Gliese 167
450:talk page
423:WP:NASTRO
415:WP:NASTRO
372:wp:nastro
199:WP:NASTRO
37:talk page
452:or in a
427:AstroCog
325:Relisted
260:Relisted
120:View log
39:or in a
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
398:Warden
238:Delete
139:Google
97:delete
411:Merge
394:Bryce
306:Bryce
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
431:talk
402:talk
392:per
390:Keep
381:talk
368:Keep
310:talk
302:Keep
246:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
50:keep
189:TWL
118:– (
433:)
404:)
383:)
312:)
248:)
225:.
213:)
209:•
201:.
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
429:(
400:(
379:(
351:i
348:t
345:s
342:u
339:D
308:(
286:i
283:t
280:s
277:u
274:D
244:(
211:c
207:t
205:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.