31:
542:
articles, and present their asserions in an encyclopedic and well sourced manner, wiki has room for both. We are here to inform the reader, not promote one side more or less than another. POV forks are emminently allowed here on Wiki... for balance, and to improve the project. Its not a "bad word".
541:
Indeed, and there are two real-world POVs, neither "neutral" in that each states their case from their own prespective and in depth: that global warming is a major concern, and that global warming is hype are opposing views. If each is side of the dichotomy is treated neutrally by their respective
463:
Not POV fork if covered itself in reliable sources. What would be left after cleanup would depend a lot on just who was doing the cleanup now, wouldn't it? As long as what's left is itself well sourced, there is no reason to make it into something it is not. And
476:(and please lets not call either of these "propagandist essays" too)... so it must be that Wiki accepts that opposite sides exist in any argument. Its up to the reader to make their own determinations based upon the information offered and how it is sourced.
423:
for sourcing. The phenomena of "Global
Warming" has indeed been disputed as "political hype" by scientists and press. Wiki is about balance, and all legitimate viewpoints are worthy of inclusion.
523:
At nearly 100kb, the global warming article is practically "full." I'm curious as to why there can't be two articles on the opposing viewpoint. A google news search shows that a
184:
151:
468:
is itself a huge article... so having a seperate article on the opposite viewpoint gives balance to
Knowledge (XXG) and makes sense. And as for POV forks, I note that
40:
118:
113:
122:
325:, It isn't OR. The article does site references, and there are a number of prominent scientists and articles written calling global warming a "
105:
499:. There is no need for 2 articles on the "opposing viewpoint". And just because something is sourced doesn't mean it doesn't violate NPOV. -
17:
593:
402:
575:
65:
46:
296:
556:
536:
508:
496:
490:
458:
437:
411:
388:
371:
355:
351:
338:
317:
300:
279:
255:
238:
216:
198:
174:
87:
207:
as a POVFORK/essay (possibly a school paper). The "Conclusion" section is a give-away that this doesn't fit here.
551:
485:
432:
574:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
109:
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
292:
313:
101:
93:
532:
359:
334:
309:
544:
478:
425:
275:
445:
POV fork. After cleanup, there would be nothing left of this article that is not already present in
420:
367:
524:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
407:
288:
268:
225:
163:
528:
330:
251:
504:
454:
271:
171:
264:
246:, may or may not be a fork, but it surely is argumentative essay of original research. -
465:
446:
384:
347:
167:
587:
397:
363:
212:
473:
139:
326:
247:
192:
78:
500:
450:
380:
224:
Everything in this article is covered elsewhere in
Knowledge (XXG). Fails
527:
of scientists and organizations have indeed called global warming a hype.
469:
208:
568:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
25:
291:. There are plenty of other places sceptical POV belongs
146:
135:
131:
127:
68:). No further edits should be made to this page.
578:). No further edits should be made to this page.
185:list of Environment-related deletion discussions
8:
179:
183:: This debate has been included in the
45:For an explanation of the process, see
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
346:Essay. The topic is redundant to
29:
495:The "opposing viewpoint" is at
47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
308:- Agree with all of the above.
1:
41:deletion review on 2009 May 4
610:
497:Global warming controversy
389:23:38, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
372:10:58, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
356:Politics of global warming
352:Global warming controversy
339:19:40, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
318:03:32, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
301:22:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
280:14:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
256:14:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
239:13:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
217:13:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
199:13:31, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
175:12:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
472:has not been merged into
379:Clearly redundant essay.
594:Pages at deletion review
571:Please do not modify it.
61:Please do not modify it.
557:16:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
537:13:24, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
509:05:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
491:04:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
459:04:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
438:20:53, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
412:04:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
396:per propagandist essay.
88:08:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
360:Climate change denial
162:Appears to be a not
102:Global Warming: Hype
94:Global Warming: Hype
73:The result was
293:Blue Square Thing
236:
201:
188:
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
601:
573:
547:
481:
428:
235:
233:
195:
189:
149:
143:
125:
63:
33:
32:
26:
609:
608:
604:
603:
602:
600:
599:
598:
584:
583:
582:
576:deletion review
569:
545:
479:
426:
405:
248:Smerdis of Tlön
229:
193:
166:version of the
145:
116:
100:
97:
66:deletion review
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
607:
605:
597:
596:
586:
585:
581:
580:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
466:Global Warming
447:Global warming
440:
414:
401:
391:
374:
348:Global warming
341:
320:
303:
282:
258:
241:
219:
202:
177:
168:Global Warming
156:
155:
96:
91:
85:
71:
70:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
606:
595:
592:
591:
589:
579:
577:
572:
566:
558:
555:
554:
553:
549:
548:
540:
539:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
493:
492:
489:
488:
487:
483:
482:
475:
471:
467:
462:
461:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
441:
439:
436:
435:
434:
430:
429:
422:
418:
415:
413:
409:
404:
399:
395:
392:
390:
386:
382:
378:
375:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
342:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
319:
315:
311:
307:
304:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
283:
281:
277:
273:
270:
266:
262:
259:
257:
253:
249:
245:
242:
240:
232:
227:
223:
220:
218:
214:
210:
206:
203:
200:
197:
196:
186:
182:
178:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
157:
153:
148:
141:
137:
133:
129:
124:
120:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
98:
95:
92:
90:
89:
86:
84:
83:
79:
76:
69:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
570:
567:
552:
550:
543:
486:
484:
477:
474:Christianity
442:
433:
431:
424:
419:and send to
416:
393:
376:
343:
322:
310:Vote Cthulhu
305:
284:
260:
243:
230:
221:
204:
191:
180:
159:
81:
80:
74:
72:
60:
57:
36:
529:Smallman12q
331:Smallman12q
421:WP:CLEANUP
408:WP Physics
287:- Clearly
231:Blanchardb
172:Dougofborg
588:Category
546:Schmidt,
480:Schmidt,
470:Satanism
427:Schmidt,
403:κοντριβς
398:Headbomb
364:Apoc2400
237:- timed
170:article
152:View log
289:WP:SOAP
269:WP:SOAP
226:WP:SOAP
222:Delete.
164:WP:NPOV
119:protect
114:history
525:number
443:Delete
394:Delete
377:Delete
344:Delete
306:Delete
285:Delete
261:Delete
244:Delete
205:Delete
160:Delete
147:delete
123:delete
75:delete
501:Atmoz
451:Atmoz
265:WP:OR
150:) – (
140:views
132:watch
128:links
16:<
533:talk
505:talk
455:talk
417:Keep
385:talk
381:Gigs
368:talk
362:. --
358:and
335:talk
327:hype
323:Keep
314:talk
297:talk
276:talk
272:andy
252:talk
228:. --
213:talk
181:Note
136:logs
110:talk
106:edit
449:. -
209:JJL
190:--
82:Nja
590::
535:)
507:)
457:)
410:}
406:–
387:)
370:)
354:,
350:,
337:)
329:".
316:)
299:)
278:)
267:,
263:-
254:)
215:)
187:.
138:|
134:|
130:|
126:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
77:.
43:.
531:(
503:(
453:(
400:{
383:(
366:(
333:(
312:(
295:(
274:(
250:(
234:-
211:(
194:J
154:)
144:(
142:)
104:(
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.