Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Gröûp X (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

238:, because they're an internet phenomenon more than they are a live band. Per note 1 "Any content which is distributed solely on the Internet is considered, for the purposes of this guideline, as web content. Content which has been packaged into material form, such as onto CD, DVD or book form, but which is still primarily only available for sale via the Internet, still falls under these guidelines." As far as I understand, they only sell their CDs on their site and through online retailers (IIRC they used to sell on the 246:", A site with alexa rank 2,400, and which has a wikipedia article that survived AfD, so that seems to be a non-trivial mention. They need at least one more for "multiple secondary sources", but one good mention suggests they aren't totally unknown and that further evidence of notability can be found, so I think it's premature to just trash the article - 192:
I probably wouldn't have prodded it had I noticed the previous AFD. That said, I see no reliable sources, and the article has been tagged as lacking them for almost a year now. A quick Google search doesn't turn up any, and most of the results are generic hits. I have to go with
322:- they're not obviously notable, but there do seem to be enough sources here to justify a keep. By the way, I'd point out to Dchall1 that articles that have previously been through an AFD process (whether successful or not) are not candidates for being 288:: I think those in this discussion should read the discussion for the previous nomination last year. I can't see any new points being raised here, so I can't see why a different conclusion should be reached. 82: 77: 264: 137: 153: 72: 152:. Since this has survived an AfD before, I think it should go through it again rather than simply get prodded away. My opinion is pretty much the same as it was in 242:
MP3.com before it committed temporary net-suicide and re-launched). For references to their notability, the external links section shows one review by "
335: 314: 297: 279: 254: 222: 206: 187: 169: 55: 17: 110: 105: 114: 97: 353: 36: 305:: A few of their videos/songs have started a sort of internet meme. There are articles on them to be found, too. 52: 352:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
331: 310: 293: 49: 327: 101: 243: 165: 235: 149: 274: 202: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
323: 93: 61: 183: 231: 306: 289: 248: 216: 161: 271: 198: 145: 131: 179: 346:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
214:
An article that survived an AfD can't be deleted via prod -
265:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
127: 123: 119: 178:
per my vote on the last AfD (as Danny Lilithborne).
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 356:). No further edits should be made to this page. 83:Articles for deletion/Gröûp X (3rd nomination) 78:Articles for deletion/Gröûp X (2nd nomination) 8: 263:: This debate has been included in the 70: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 68: 24: 1: 148:on the grounds that it fails 73:Articles for deletion/Gröûp X 336:03:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 315:18:22, 11 January 2008 (UTC) 56:06:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC) 298:13:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 280:01:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 255:11:09, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 230:. They should be judged on 223:10:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 207:06:26, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 188:05:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 170:05:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 373: 349:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 67:AfDs for this article: 244:Associated Content 282: 268: 364: 351: 277: 269: 259: 253: 221: 154:the previous AfD 135: 117: 34: 372: 371: 367: 366: 365: 363: 362: 361: 360: 354:deletion review 347: 275: 247: 215: 108: 92: 89: 87: 65: 50:Yamamoto Ichiro 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 370: 368: 359: 358: 341: 339: 338: 317: 300: 283: 257: 225: 209: 190: 142: 141: 88: 86: 85: 80: 75: 69: 66: 64: 59: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 369: 357: 355: 350: 344: 343: 342: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 318: 316: 312: 308: 304: 301: 299: 295: 291: 287: 284: 281: 278: 273: 266: 262: 258: 256: 252: 251: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 226: 224: 220: 219: 213: 210: 208: 204: 200: 196: 191: 189: 185: 181: 177: 174: 173: 172: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 139: 133: 129: 125: 121: 116: 112: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 90: 84: 81: 79: 76: 74: 71: 63: 60: 58: 57: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 348: 345: 340: 319: 302: 285: 260: 249: 239: 234:rather than 227: 217: 211: 194: 175: 157: 143: 45: 43: 31: 28: 144:Prodded by 324:WP:PRODded 307:Grazfather 290:Bondegezou 166:Talk at me 320:Weak Keep 328:Terraxos 250:TheBilly 236:WP:MUSIC 218:TheBilly 162:furrykef 150:WP:MUSIC 138:View log 272:the wub 212:Comment 199:Dchall1 146:Dchall1 111:protect 106:history 94:Gröûp X 62:Gröûp X 232:WP:WEB 195:Delete 180:JuJube 115:delete 160:). - 132:views 124:watch 120:links 16:< 332:talk 311:talk 303:Keep 294:talk 286:Keep 276:"?!" 261:Note 228:Keep 203:talk 184:talk 176:Keep 158:keep 128:logs 102:talk 98:edit 46:keep 270:-- 267:. 240:old 197:. 136:– ( 334:) 326:. 313:) 296:) 205:) 186:) 168:) 130:| 126:| 122:| 118:| 113:| 109:| 104:| 100:| 53:会話 48:. 330:( 309:( 292:( 201:( 182:( 164:( 156:( 140:) 134:) 96:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Yamamoto Ichiro
会話
06:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Gröûp X
Articles for deletion/Gröûp X
Articles for deletion/Gröûp X (2nd nomination)
Articles for deletion/Gröûp X (3rd nomination)
Gröûp X
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Dchall1
WP:MUSIC
the previous AfD
furrykef
Talk at me
05:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
JuJube
talk
05:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Dchall1

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.