Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Grand Hotel van Cleef - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

213:-- I have 31,500 given, and even 194 in news. Even if it were 7, Google search results by themselves aren't grounds for deletion. First article by a new contributor to the English Knowledge (XXG) so s/he should have time enough to work on improvements with this discussion open. I removed CSD tag on a subjective call to at least give the editor a fair shot with an article. I will 100% agree that the article stands little chance on its own without sizable improvements, though. To the author, good luck. 195:
There seems to be a few more sources coming up from the above tool but when searcihhgn this morning there is a link with 7 results 2 in german. On this one there is 195, however a reader of German might help because it would seem to have heightened it's potential notability.
149: 110: 245: 143: 244:. Seriously, I think the nominator should consider adding the study German to their list of activities for the Christmas vacation: look at the results of 83: 78: 87: 70: 17: 164: 180:
I don't know what the notability standards of german Knowledge (XXG) is but 7 ghits doesn't quite cover it. Delete non notable.
131: 258: 362: 125: 36: 343: 329: 315: 289: 271: 222: 205: 189: 52: 325: 285: 201: 185: 74: 121: 361:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
320:
Well I learned something today. I didn't know the google hits were by date. Consider it wqithdrawn my mistake.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
171: 309: 321: 281: 197: 181: 66: 58: 218: 157: 137: 49: 303: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
339: 267: 299: 298:
news. Look earlier than October 2009 and you'll find that there's more than enough to pass
235: 214: 294:
Nothing in our notability guidelines to say that they should have been covered in
104: 335: 334:
No worries Hell. Thanks for withdrawing, and thanks to Spiff for their comment.
263: 240: 278:
Sorry, I still don't find it notable, take a look at this search....
355:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
262:... Hell, consider withdrawing this: you can't win it. 100: 96: 92: 156: 170: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 365:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 234:--and possibly in a speedy manner. Look at 238:, for instance, a full-length article in 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 259:Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 1: 344:04:22, 28 October 2009 (UTC) 330:04:11, 28 October 2009 (UTC) 316:04:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC) 290:03:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC) 272:03:55, 28 October 2009 (UTC) 223:22:52, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 206:22:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 190:22:02, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 53:04:35, 28 October 2009 (UTC) 382: 358:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 250:Financial Times Germany 46:Speedy keep (withdrawn) 252:, and article in the 67:Grand Hotel van Cleef 59:Grand Hotel van Cleef 256:, an article in the 248:. An article in the 254:Schwabische Zeitung 246:this Google search 44:The result was 373: 360: 322:Hell In A Bucket 312: 306: 282:Hell In A Bucket 198:Hell In A Bucket 182:Hell In A Bucket 175: 174: 160: 108: 90: 34: 381: 380: 376: 375: 374: 372: 371: 370: 369: 363:deletion review 356: 310: 304: 117: 81: 65: 62: 50:Good Ol’factory 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 379: 377: 368: 367: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 275: 274: 228: 227: 226: 225: 178: 177: 114: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 378: 366: 364: 359: 353: 345: 341: 337: 333: 332: 331: 327: 323: 319: 318: 317: 314: 313: 307: 301: 297: 293: 292: 291: 287: 283: 279: 277: 276: 273: 269: 265: 261: 260: 255: 251: 247: 243: 242: 237: 233: 230: 229: 224: 220: 216: 212: 209: 208: 207: 203: 199: 194: 193: 192: 191: 187: 183: 173: 169: 166: 163: 159: 155: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 133: 130: 127: 123: 120: 119:Find sources: 115: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 357: 354: 308: 295: 257: 253: 249: 239: 231: 210: 179: 167: 161: 153: 146: 140: 134: 128: 118: 45: 43: 31: 28: 241:Der Spiegel 144:free images 215:Datheisen 305:Spaceman 111:View log 211:Comment 150:WP refs 138:scholar 84:protect 79:history 336:Drmies 300:WP:GNG 296:recent 264:Drmies 122:Google 88:delete 311:Spiff 165:JSTOR 126:books 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 340:talk 326:talk 286:talk 268:talk 236:this 232:Keep 219:talk 202:talk 186:talk 158:FENS 132:news 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 302:. - 172:TWL 109:– ( 342:) 328:) 288:) 270:) 221:) 204:) 188:) 152:) 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 48:. 338:( 324:( 284:( 280:] 266:( 217:( 200:( 184:( 176:) 168:· 162:· 154:· 147:· 141:· 135:· 129:· 124:( 116:( 113:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Good Ol’factory
04:35, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Grand Hotel van Cleef
Grand Hotel van Cleef
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Hell In A Bucket
talk
22:02, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Hell In A Bucket
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.