346:
In addition to what Czar says, which is correct, I'll also add that its pretty common for there to be an initial deletion discussion to be held on one example of a type of article, and then further action taken based on the result of the initial discussion. For example, lets say there is a strong
487:) so in the end I've just wasted an hour of my life scrapping the barrel for sources!, I'm a great lover of Vice City however even I agree this shouldn't be an article, Merge the radio descriptions into Vice City as they're relevent but the rest can go. –
355:
soundtrack is nominated for deletion next, if it looks to be a comparable situation. On the other hand, if someone points out how there are actually a lot of websites that cover this sort of thing, then they may be less likely to nominated
166:
252:
I'm confused why its "okay" for those three articles to remain, but the Vice City article has to redirect to the commercially-released discs that don't contain the full soundtrack ingame... Damian001 (talk) 07:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
217:
I strongly oppose this deletion. Vice city soundtrack is one of the most iconic video game soundtracks of all time, and in many cases have introduced entire communities to genres of music they might not have otherwise listened to.
425:
305:
you're using to justify keeping this article separate from the main game's article. It was originally redirected for a lack of references, nevertheless from reliable sources. The soundtrack article is also full of
160:
232:
Hi Onel, I see you've recommended the soundtrack article for GTA Vice City to be deleted. Why havent you also recommended the soundtrack articles for GTA3, GTA4, and GTA5 be deleted as well.?
92:
87:
96:
301:
Every soundtrack, as any article, is discussed on its own merits. Also we typically discuss one case before deciding whether a principle applies to a whole group. The question is what
484:
79:
360:, and whole thing may be dropped. But its not abnormal (or wrong) to just "start with one". People can pick and chose whatever they want to nominate, as long as its in good faith.
400:
126:
119:
454:- Can you point out a few specifics? I'm neutral right now, but I'm seeing a lot of false positives in that first page of listings. I really don't think the article
380:
83:
314:, though it'd be fine to export the content to a fandom wiki (such as Wikia) if you want to preserve the unverified information. But when a topic lacks
268:
181:
290:
148:
75:
67:
455:
560:
537:
500:
471:
441:
412:
392:
371:
341:
227:
212:
61:
142:
197:
No indication of independent notability. A single non-RS source. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that it meets
428:(Granted not all are great however notability is there)- As the game was released in 2002 I'd imagine most sources would be offline. –
138:
17:
188:
236:
279:
241:
333:, we then lack the means to write an encyclopedic treatment of the topic, hence why the article is redirected or deleted.
246:
513:
579:
40:
549:
408:
388:
154:
269:
https://www.gamespot.com/forums/games-discussion-1000000/vice-city-hands-down-has-the-best-soundtrack-out-o-27530615/
291:
http://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/seven-songs-you-only-know-and-love-if-you-played-grand-theft-auto-vice-city-7558
302:
52:. Given the extensive history of edit-warring, I will be protecting the redirect to enforce the close decision.
457:
The
Notorious B.I.G. & 9/11: Radio Censorship, Illuminati Conspiracy Theories and Everything In Between
530:
466:
404:
384:
366:
575:
36:
223:
174:
311:
525:
461:
361:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
574:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
315:
198:
219:
328:
323:
319:
307:
280:
http://thebests.kotaku.com/the-best-licensed-video-game-soundtrack-of-all-time-1685069296
554:
488:
451:
429:
335:
483:- I assumed this was the CD however I've just found out we already have a CD article (
310:—like Izno said on my talk page, it's exactly the sort of unencyclopedic information
202:
53:
113:
460:
is going to be significant coverage on this subject, for example.
568:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
516:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
485:
Grand Theft Auto: Vice City
Official Soundtrack Box Set
109:
105:
101:
173:
522:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
582:). No further edits should be made to this page.
401:list of Video games-related deletion discussions
351:soundtrack article. Then its likely that the
8:
399:Note: This debate has been included in the
379:Note: This debate has been included in the
398:
381:list of Music-related deletion discussions
378:
261:
550:Grand_Theft_Auto:_Vice_City#Soundtrack
76:Grand Theft Auto: Vice City soundtrack
68:Grand Theft Auto: Vice City soundtrack
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
552:), per my longer comment above
237:Grand_Theft_Auto_III_soundtrack
242:Grand_Theft_Auto_IV_soundtrack
1:
347:consensus here to delete the
247:Grand_Theft_Auto_V_soundtrack
599:
571:Please do not modify it.
561:07:53, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
538:04:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
501:21:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
472:21:07, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
442:20:37, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
413:20:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
393:20:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
372:20:51, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
342:13:18, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
228:12:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
213:11:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
62:11:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
316:significant coverage
50:restore the redirect
324:independent sources
540:
426:sources on Google
415:
405:Shawn in Montreal
395:
385:Shawn in Montreal
332:
308:original research
590:
573:
559:
557:
535:
533:
528:
521:
519:
517:
498:
493:
469:
464:
439:
434:
369:
364:
340:
338:
326:
303:reliable sources
293:
288:
282:
277:
271:
266:
209:
206:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
598:
597:
593:
592:
591:
589:
588:
587:
586:
580:deletion review
569:
555:
553:
541:
531:
526:
524:
512:
510:
494:
489:
467:
462:
435:
430:
367:
362:
336:
334:
298:
297:
296:
289:
285:
278:
274:
267:
263:
207:
204:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
596:
594:
585:
584:
564:
563:
520:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
475:
474:
446:
445:
417:
416:
396:
376:
375:
374:
295:
294:
283:
272:
260:
259:
255:
250:
249:
244:
239:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
595:
583:
581:
577:
572:
566:
565:
562:
558:
551:
547:
543:
542:
539:
536:
534:
529:
518:
515:
502:
499:
497:
492:
486:
482:
479:
478:
477:
476:
473:
470:
465:
459:
458:
453:
450:
449:
448:
447:
444:
443:
440:
438:
433:
427:
423:
419:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
397:
394:
390:
386:
382:
377:
373:
370:
365:
359:
354:
350:
345:
344:
343:
339:
330:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:we don't host
309:
304:
300:
299:
292:
287:
284:
281:
276:
273:
270:
265:
262:
258:
254:
248:
245:
243:
240:
238:
235:
234:
233:
230:
229:
225:
221:
215:
214:
211:
210:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
570:
567:
545:
527:CAPTAIN RAJU
523:
511:
495:
490:
480:
463:Sergecross73
456:
436:
431:
421:
420:
363:Sergecross73
357:
352:
348:
318:in multiple
286:
275:
264:
256:
251:
231:
216:
203:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
161:free images
257:References
220:Sushovande
576:talk page
452:Davey2010
349:Vice City
37:talk page
578:or in a
546:redirect
544:Restore
514:Relisted
320:reliable
120:View log
39:or in a
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
54:Nyttend
468:msg me
368:msg me
199:WP:GNG
139:Google
97:delete
491:Davey
481:Merge
432:Davey
358:GTA 3
353:GTA 3
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
556:czar
496:2010
437:2010
424:per
422:Keep
409:talk
389:talk
337:czar
224:talk
208:5969
205:Onel
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
532:(✉)
201:.
189:TWL
118:– (
411:)
403:.
391:)
383:.
322:,
226:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
548:(
407:(
387:(
331:)
329:?
327:(
222:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.