368:
There is an overwhelming colossal difference. His was merely one of a set of ten articles by the WSJ staff published the day after the 9/11 attack that collectively earned a prize for the paper, not for Mr. Ip. Eight of the articles were written by a total of 18 different reporters. The other two
437:
of which concluded, "if you’ve read a lot of economics in the past, this book won’t be very revelatory for you. It speaks very well to the person who is new to economics, but not so much to someone who studied it in college, for example, and has kept up on the ideas."
595:
He is now a WSJ columnist. the
Journal describes his book as "go-to economic guide for college undergraduates, self-directed investors and budding financial journalists". The book was reviewed in multiple reliable news sources. He held a major editorial position at
442:
described it as "an excellent read for non-economists". That sure doesn't sound to me like these reviewers think this is a significant work, they think it's a book for people who don't know anything about the subject.
235:
179:
547:
We seem to be off-track. I respect your right to your opinion. All I'm saying is that the reviews don't appear to support a claim that the work is significant or well-known as is required by
439:
404:
132:
280:
300:
173:
593:
555:. Even if we agreed the book was notable, that wouldn't automatically make the author notable unless the book also met the additional criteria in
139:
434:
399:
516:
17:
433:. The criteria is that it's a well-known or significant work. It's not either of those. It's just a book that got a few reviews,
500:
Yeah, well, I hope you don't mind if we don't pay much attention to your unspoken speculation as to this guy's motives.
483:
It could also be that he's a reporter at the WSJ and he has a big
Rolodex of people he could reach out to for a review.
67:
628:
40:
401:
194:
105:
100:
161:
109:
552:
408:
92:
504:
551:. You might have a case that the book itself is notable based on the reviews but notability is generally
512:
403:
http://moneyweek.com/book-review-the-little-book-of-economics-greg-ip-63015 (blacklisted link), including
155:
624:
605:
462:
326:
265:
36:
457:
It could be a significant work for people new to the subject. Getting reviews is a sign of notability.
556:
548:
430:
391:
215:
151:
589:
260:
in fact, Greg Ip is quite a unique name and it is extremely easy to google him and turn up sources.
187:
609:
568:
520:
492:
466:
452:
420:
378:
352:
330:
312:
292:
269:
247:
227:
74:
366:
321:- sources where already reasonable. Finding more 'reliable' source was easy, I've added some.
201:
564:
508:
488:
448:
416:
374:
308:
288:
243:
223:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
623:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
601:
458:
322:
261:
61:
211:
597:
210:
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by
167:
560:
484:
444:
412:
370:
304:
284:
239:
219:
96:
126:
361:
No, he did not win a
Pulitzer Prize. It was awarded to the Wall Street Journal
55:
588:
In fact, Googling instantly turned up a profile of him and his career in the
559:
of being significant or well-known. Does that help explain my position?
398:, which has been the subject of multiple independent periodical reviews,
88:
80:
396:
The Little Book of
Economics: How the Economy Works in the Real World
600:. He has won a blue-linked journalism award. Why is this at AFD?
429:
Oh, please. It takes more than a couple book reviews to satisfy
617:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
369:
were staff roundups not attributed to any individual authors.
236:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
122:
118:
114:
186:
218:and unhelpful. Googling turned up nothing useful.
200:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
631:). No further edits should be made to this page.
281:list of News media-related deletion discussions
8:
301:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
299:Note: This debate has been included in the
279:Note: This debate has been included in the
234:Note: This debate has been included in the
52:. Article's subject is found to be notable.
298:
278:
233:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
394:criterion 3. Ip is the author of
1:
493:22:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
467:21:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
453:09:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
421:03:16, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
379:01:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
353:20:35, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
331:10:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
313:01:49, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
293:01:49, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
248:01:49, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
228:16:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
365:, not Grep Ip personally.
338:Overwhelming Colossal Keep:
214:. Sources offered are all
648:
610:00:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
569:00:36, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
521:21:31, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
270:00:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
75:00:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
620:Please do not modify it.
409:Central Bank of Barbados
32:Please do not modify it.
340:The guy won a freaking
592:, where he now works.
590:Wall Street Journal
48:The result was
524:
507:comment added by
315:
295:
250:
73:
639:
622:
523:
501:
350:
205:
204:
190:
142:
130:
112:
70:
64:
53:
34:
647:
646:
642:
641:
640:
638:
637:
636:
635:
629:deletion review
618:
553:WP:NOTINHERITED
502:
346:
342:Pulitzer Prize.
147:
138:
103:
87:
84:
68:
62:
58:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
645:
643:
634:
633:
613:
612:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
424:
423:
384:
383:
382:
381:
356:
355:
334:
333:
316:
296:
275:
274:
273:
272:
252:
251:
208:
207:
144:
83:
78:
56:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
644:
632:
630:
626:
621:
615:
614:
611:
607:
603:
599:
598:The Economist
594:
591:
587:
584:
583:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
499:
496:
495:
494:
490:
486:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
468:
464:
460:
456:
455:
454:
450:
446:
441:
436:
432:
428:
427:
426:
425:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
400:
397:
393:
389:
386:
385:
380:
376:
372:
367:
364:
360:
359:
358:
357:
354:
351:
349:
343:
339:
336:
335:
332:
328:
324:
320:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
297:
294:
290:
286:
282:
277:
276:
271:
267:
263:
259:
256:
255:
254:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
232:
231:
230:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
203:
199:
196:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
153:
150:
149:Find sources:
145:
141:
137:
134:
128:
124:
120:
116:
111:
107:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
85:
82:
79:
77:
76:
71:
65:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
619:
616:
585:
509:NukeThePukes
503:— Preceding
497:
395:
387:
362:
347:
345:
341:
337:
318:
257:
209:
197:
191:
183:
176:
170:
164:
158:
148:
135:
49:
47:
31:
28:
602:E.M.Gregory
459:Jonpatterns
323:Jonpatterns
262:E.M.Gregory
174:free images
557:WP:NAUTHOR
549:WP:NAUTHOR
431:WP:NAUTHOR
392:WP:NAUTHOR
344:Nuf 'ced.
216:WP:PRIMARY
63:have a cup
625:talk page
407:from the
348:Nha Trang
305:• Gene93k
285:• Gene93k
240:• Gene93k
37:talk page
627:or in a
517:contribs
505:unsigned
390:: Meets
133:View log
39:or in a
561:Msnicki
485:Msnicki
445:Msnicki
440:Another
413:Altamel
371:Msnicki
258:Comment
220:Msnicki
180:WP refs
168:scholar
106:protect
101:history
89:Greg Ip
81:Greg Ip
498:Reply:
212:WP:GNG
152:Google
110:delete
57:Coffee
363:staff
195:JSTOR
156:books
140:Stats
127:views
119:watch
115:links
69:beans
16:<
606:talk
586:Keep
565:talk
513:talk
489:talk
463:talk
449:talk
417:talk
388:Keep
375:talk
327:talk
319:Keep
309:talk
289:talk
266:talk
244:talk
224:talk
188:FENS
162:news
123:logs
97:talk
93:edit
50:keep
435:one
405:one
202:TWL
131:– (
72://
66://
60://
608:)
567:)
519:)
515:•
491:)
465:)
451:)
419:)
411:.
377:)
329:)
311:)
303:.
291:)
283:.
268:)
246:)
238:.
226:)
182:)
125:|
121:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
54:—
604:(
563:(
511:(
487:(
461:(
447:(
415:(
373:(
325:(
307:(
287:(
264:(
242:(
222:(
206:)
198:·
192:·
184:·
177:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
154:(
146:(
143:)
136:·
129:)
91:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.