507:
This article was nominated for deletion within a few hours of its creation and, as a new creation by an inexperienced editor, it's obviously a weak stub. In considering the merits of the topic, experienced editors like us are expected to go beyond what's in the stub, reviewing available sources
788:
claim of notability is as a local councillor. There are a fair number of people who served as local councillors and then went on to also achieve higher, more includable notablity claims — for example, four of the five people in
401:
the seat, not just run for it, to get a
Knowledge (XXG) article on the basis of the election itself. But there's no evidence of preexisting notability here, because serving on a borough council isn't an automatic free pass over
194:
93:
705:. Nothing stops anybody from trying to create an article about anything they want to, so plenty of Knowledge (XXG) articles exist that rightly should not. The existence of that article does not prove that a
414:
notable than the norm for that role, not in simply being able to verify that they exist. No prejudice against recreation on or after June 8 if he wins, but nothing here gets him an article today.
471:
that enough media coverage exists to get him over GNG, ideally by actually adding it to the article but at the very least by showing actual hard results of a search in this discussion.
272:
790:
246:
88:
512:. I have cited that guideline, as suggested by the edit notice ("valid arguments citing relevant guidelines will be given more weight than unsupported statements"). Per
188:
147:
926:
298:
154:
654:
327:
406:
either. For both local borough councillors and as yet unelected parliamentary candidates, the path to a valid notability claim lies in being able to
520:, there is no requirement for me to do the work of actually writing the article. I might still go on to improve or rewrite the article per our
120:
115:
66:
759:
124:
620:
No, the case here has to be made by those wanting action, who are expected to search for sources and alternatives to deletion per our
17:
989:
958:
938:
917:
902:
891:
850:
771:
742:
692:
666:
633:
611:
541:
500:
446:
423:
379:
364:
316:
290:
264:
238:
107:
72:
433:
The subject's role as opposition leader seems to have generated adequate biographical coverage for our purposes and so this passes
904:
which is really about local issues not
Stafford as a person/political figure: he is a run-of-the-mill local politician, and per
508:
using the search links provided above. I have done this and am satisfied that the sources out there mean that the topic passes
209:
370:
Evidently the IP editors were well informed. Reliable sources now show that he is the
Conservative candidate for that seat.--
176:
985:
867:
751:
702:
1009:
40:
908:
he is not notable, having neither a sufficiently important politician nor significant, non-routine press coverage. --
733:, rather than constituting evidence that the article on Gregory Stafford needs to be kept just because Bell has one.
393:
in an election — if you cannot show and properly source that he already had preexisting notability for other reasons
809:
borough council per se — the borough council is just an additional detail about a person who has an article because
709:
exists to keep such articles — all that proves is that until you pointed it out just now, none of
Knowledge (XXG)'s
170:
767:
688:
629:
537:
442:
61:
676:
166:
913:
524:
but first we should dismiss this deletion proposal which naturally has a chilling effect on such work. Per
973:
517:
226:
884:
662:
309:
283:
257:
521:
1005:
216:
111:
36:
763:
762:
which is an extended hierarchy which well demonstrates that such content is acceptable and accepted.
684:
625:
533:
438:
801:, and the other has been head of an important national organization. All five have articles on the
202:
56:
53:
657:, the consensus is that simply being on a local council in England does not establish notability.
621:
513:
909:
758:" and so it supports my position. Julian Bell is not an isolated example; he is in the category
509:
434:
981:
954:
934:
879:
846:
738:
658:
607:
496:
419:
304:
278:
252:
234:
182:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1004:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
967:
905:
525:
403:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
679:, has an article. This demonstrates that there's no such consensus and we should rely upon
375:
360:
103:
78:
680:
558:
way to resolve any concerns about whether a topic actually clears GNG or not, it's not the
460:
833:
notable than borough council alone — except perhaps in the rare occasion that they can be
407:
977:
950:
930:
842:
734:
603:
492:
415:
230:
141:
372:
357:
330:
claiming that
Gregory Stafford is the Conservative candidate for that seat.
530:
nothing scares potentially valuable contributors away faster than hostility
756:
these comparisons are important as the encyclopedia should be consistent
966:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a promotional vehicle for politicians. Fails
389:. A person does not get a Knowledge (XXG) article just for being a
326:. There have been repeated edits by IP editors to the article on
998:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
870:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
841:
more notable than the norm for that level of significance.
582:
whether quality sourcing actually exists or not — but you
570:
that a GNG-satisfying volume of sourcing exists — again,
554:
to fix the article yourself — while certainly that's the
349:
344:
339:
334:
137:
133:
129:
94:
Articles for deletion/Gregory
Stafford (2nd nomination)
791:
Category:Councillors in the London
Borough of Hounslow
201:
949:
fails WP:NPOL. Local coverage as a local councillor.
876:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
729:possible that the article on Julian Bell should be
273:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
215:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1012:). No further edits should be made to this page.
602:of hits in news databases, and on and so forth.
247:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
725:it met our inclusion standards or not. So it's
594:discussion: such as some actual URLs of actual
225:Previously deleted at AfD. Still fails to meet
8:
927:list of England-related deletion discussions
925:Note: This debate has been included in the
655:Cardiff Central (UK Parliament constituency)
328:Cardiff Central (UK Parliament constituency)
297:Note: This debate has been included in the
271:Note: This debate has been included in the
245:Note: This debate has been included in the
299:list of People-related deletion discussions
971:
924:
296:
270:
244:
760:Local political office-holders in England
459:that media coverage exists to confer a
86:
901:Only coverage is in local news such as
89:Articles for deletion/Gregory Stafford
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
566:does not clear GNG just because you
784:accept articles about people whose
85:
675:Note that the rival party leader,
590:the actual results of a search in
340:16:36, 10 May 2017 213.152.162.10
335:15:14, 10 May 2017 165.225.80.252
24:
829:attained something significantly
397:of his candidacy, then he has to
345:09:47, 11 May 2017 213.210.2.234
717:it in order to give it a proper
350:15:52, 11 May 2017 80.7.141.152
817:gets a Knowledge (XXG) article
1:
483:— so it's not enough to just
598:of quality sources, actual
550:I didn't say that you were
487:that if you're not showing
479:that coverage exists about
1029:
562:possible way. But a topic
1001:Please do not modify it.
990:16:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
959:14:53, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
939:18:44, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
918:11:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
892:04:50, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
851:12:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
772:08:00, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
743:16:00, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
693:09:28, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
667:08:32, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
634:07:28, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
612:16:20, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
542:09:20, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
501:23:56, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
447:20:19, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
424:13:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
380:07:06, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
365:20:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
317:05:06, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
291:05:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
265:05:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
239:00:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
73:00:03, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
683:, in our general way.
410:them as significantly
84:AfDs for this article:
793:went on to serve as
752:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
703:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
463:pass — you have to
837:well sourced as a
825:, if they haven't
992:
976:comment added by
941:
894:
586:have to at least
319:
293:
267:
1020:
1003:
889:
887:
882:
875:
873:
871:
821:borough council
378:
363:
314:
312:
307:
288:
286:
281:
262:
260:
255:
220:
219:
205:
157:
145:
127:
104:Gregory Stafford
79:Gregory Stafford
69:
64:
59:
34:
1028:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1010:deletion review
999:
895:
885:
880:
878:
866:
864:
780:Except that we
622:deletion policy
455:You can't just
408:reliably source
371:
356:
310:
305:
303:
284:
279:
277:
258:
253:
251:
231:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
162:
153:
118:
102:
99:
82:
67:
62:
57:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1026:
1024:
1015:
1014:
994:
993:
961:
943:
942:
921:
920:
874:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
775:
774:
746:
745:
696:
695:
670:
669:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
615:
614:
545:
544:
522:editing policy
450:
449:
427:
426:
383:
382:
353:
352:
347:
342:
337:
321:
320:
294:
268:
223:
222:
159:
98:
97:
96:
91:
83:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1025:
1013:
1011:
1007:
1002:
996:
995:
991:
987:
983:
979:
975:
969:
965:
962:
960:
956:
952:
948:
945:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
923:
922:
919:
915:
911:
910:Colapeninsula
907:
903:
900:
897:
896:
893:
890:
888:
883:
872:
869:
852:
848:
844:
840:
836:
832:
828:
824:
820:
816:
813:reasons. But
812:
808:
805:grounds, not
804:
800:
796:
792:
787:
783:
779:
778:
777:
776:
773:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
750:
749:
748:
747:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
699:
698:
697:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
673:
672:
671:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
649:
648:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
618:
617:
616:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
548:
547:
546:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
518:WP:NOTCLEANUP
515:
511:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
453:
452:
451:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
429:
428:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
400:
396:
392:
388:
385:
384:
381:
377:
374:
369:
368:
367:
366:
362:
359:
351:
348:
346:
343:
341:
338:
336:
333:
332:
331:
329:
325:
318:
315:
313:
308:
300:
295:
292:
289:
287:
282:
274:
269:
266:
263:
261:
256:
248:
243:
242:
241:
240:
236:
232:
228:
227:WP:POLITICIAN
218:
214:
211:
208:
204:
200:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
168:
165:
164:Find sources:
160:
156:
152:
149:
143:
139:
135:
131:
126:
122:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
100:
95:
92:
90:
87:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
65:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1000:
997:
972:— Preceding
963:
946:
898:
881:CAPTAIN RAJU
877:
865:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
802:
798:
794:
785:
781:
755:
730:
726:
722:
718:
714:
713:editors had
710:
706:
701:Please read
659:Power~enwiki
650:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
529:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
456:
430:
411:
398:
394:
390:
386:
354:
323:
322:
306:CAPTAIN RAJU
302:
280:CAPTAIN RAJU
276:
254:CAPTAIN RAJU
250:
224:
212:
206:
198:
191:
185:
179:
173:
163:
150:
49:
47:
31:
28:
799:Westminster
711:responsible
677:Julian Bell
578:that about
574:can simply
475:can simply
395:independent
189:free images
835:especially
719:evaluation
564:absolutely
1006:talk page
931:• Gene93k
764:Andrew D.
707:consensus
685:Andrew D.
626:Andrew D.
556:preferred
534:Andrew D.
514:WP:CHOICE
439:Andrew D.
391:candidate
37:talk page
1008:or in a
986:contribs
974:unsigned
868:Relisted
727:entirely
651:Redirect
596:examples
580:anything
552:required
510:WP:BASIC
481:anything
469:evidence
435:WP:BASIC
148:View log
39:or in a
978:Rogermx
968:WP:NPOL
951:LibStar
906:WP:NPOL
843:Bearcat
819:because
807:because
735:Bearcat
731:deleted
723:whether
715:noticed
604:Bearcat
600:numbers
572:anybody
526:WP:BITE
493:Bearcat
473:Anybody
416:Bearcat
404:WP:NPOL
324:Comment
195:WP refs
183:scholar
121:protect
116:history
54:King of
964:delete
947:delete
899:Delete
823:per se
815:nobody
803:latter
754:says "
681:WP:GNG
568:assert
461:WP:GNG
387:Delete
376:(talk)
373:Toddy1
361:(talk)
358:Toddy1
167:Google
125:delete
50:delete
811:other
782:don't
576:claim
489:proof
477:claim
210:JSTOR
171:books
155:Stats
142:views
134:watch
130:links
16:<
982:talk
955:talk
935:talk
914:talk
847:talk
831:more
827:also
786:only
768:talk
739:talk
721:for
689:talk
663:talk
630:talk
608:talk
592:this
588:show
560:only
538:talk
516:and
497:talk
467:the
465:show
443:talk
431:Keep
420:talk
412:more
235:talk
203:FENS
177:news
138:logs
112:talk
108:edit
886:(✉)
839:lot
797:at
795:MPs
653:to
532:".
528:, "
485:say
457:say
399:win
311:(✉)
285:(✉)
259:(✉)
217:TWL
146:– (
52:.
988:)
984:•
970:.
957:)
937:)
929:.
916:)
849:)
770:)
741:)
691:)
665:)
632:)
624:.
610:)
584:do
540:)
499:)
491:.
445:)
437:.
422:)
355:--
301:.
275:.
249:.
237:)
229:.
197:)
140:|
136:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
71:♠
980:(
953:(
933:(
912:(
845:(
766:(
737:(
687:(
661:(
628:(
606:(
536:(
495:(
441:(
418:(
233:(
221:)
213:·
207:·
199:·
192:·
186:·
180:·
174:·
169:(
161:(
158:)
151:·
144:)
106:(
68:♣
63:♦
58:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.