Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Green wedding - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

224:
Not only is the expression being used, but major newspapers are publishing in-depth articles about environmentally friendly weddings, wedding planners are specializing in this field, and classes on the topic are being offered. All these sources use the term "green wedding" so it is notable, and not
322:
I guess this warrants clarification - I'm not trying to assert that the concept is not notable - just that it doesn't warrant a standalone article, at least not now. The concept of a green wedding is not any different from a normal wedding, and it really doesn't warrant more than a paragraph in the
158: 119: 244: 152: 278:
in this sense is about 40 years old and so is not new. In any case, if an article title is unclear, we just rename it and so this is not grounds for deletion.
341:
try to assert that the concept is not notable), then you should have just discussed merger and redirection on the talk page (or just
17: 92: 87: 96: 79: 173: 295:
Shouldn't be hard to prove the notability of this one, given the amount of increasingly in-depth coverage it is getting.--
140: 391: 36: 390:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
283: 134: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
207:
Google searches show that the expression is being used, and that it is a topic of interest to lots of people.
372: 358: 332: 312: 287: 259: 234: 216: 198: 130: 61: 345:) rather than starting an AFD. Want to withdraw this now and then deal with it through normal editing? 180: 364: 324: 190: 368: 328: 279: 230: 194: 166: 342: 83: 353: 255: 56: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
212: 48:. Nom's issues will be addressed through normal article editing and talk page discussion. 146: 226: 296: 75: 67: 347: 251: 50: 268:
The topic is certainly notable as there are entire books written about it such as
113: 270: 208: 384:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109: 105: 101: 165: 179: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 394:). No further edits should be made to this page. 245:list of Environment-related deletion discussions 8: 239: 243:: This debate has been included in the 189:Contested prod, non-notable neologism. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 337:If that's the case (though you 1: 373:15:12, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 363:Yeah, that seems reasonable. 359:14:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 333:14:16, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 313:08:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 288:07:12, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 260:03:00, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 235:21:05, 8 February 2011 (UTC) 217:19:56, 8 February 2011 (UTC) 199:19:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC) 62:16:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 411: 387:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 323:main wedding article. 225:at all a neologism 310: 297: 262: 248: 402: 389: 309: 306: 303: 300: 249: 184: 183: 169: 117: 99: 44:The result was 34: 410: 409: 405: 404: 403: 401: 400: 399: 398: 392:deletion review 385: 307: 304: 301: 298: 126: 90: 74: 71: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 408: 406: 397: 396: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 316: 315: 290: 280:Colonel Warden 263: 237: 219: 187: 186: 123: 70: 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 407: 395: 393: 388: 382: 381: 374: 370: 366: 362: 361: 360: 356: 355: 350: 349: 344: 340: 336: 335: 334: 330: 326: 321: 318: 317: 314: 311: 294: 291: 289: 285: 281: 277: 273: 272: 271:Green Wedding 267: 264: 261: 257: 253: 246: 242: 238: 236: 232: 228: 223: 220: 218: 214: 210: 206: 203: 202: 201: 200: 196: 192: 182: 178: 175: 172: 168: 164: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 132: 129: 128:Find sources: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 76:Green wedding 73: 72: 69: 68:Green wedding 66: 64: 63: 59: 58: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 386: 383: 352: 346: 338: 319: 292: 275: 274:. The word 269: 265: 240: 221: 204: 188: 176: 170: 162: 155: 149: 143: 137: 127: 55: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 153:free images 365:Eldamorie 325:Eldamorie 252:• Gene93k 227:Cullen328 191:Eldamorie 46:WITHDRAWN 120:View log 348:postdlf 343:done it 320:Comment 159:WP refs 147:scholar 93:protect 88:history 51:postdlf 209:Borock 131:Google 97:delete 276:green 174:JSTOR 135:books 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 369:talk 354:talk 329:talk 293:Keep 284:talk 266:Keep 256:talk 241:Note 231:talk 222:Keep 213:talk 205:Keep 195:talk 167:FENS 141:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 57:talk 339:did 308:ski 302:orr 250:-- 181:TWL 118:– ( 371:) 357:) 331:) 286:) 258:) 247:. 233:) 215:) 197:) 161:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 367:( 351:( 327:( 305:u 299:K 282:( 254:( 229:( 211:( 193:( 185:) 177:· 171:· 163:· 156:· 150:· 144:· 138:· 133:( 125:( 122:) 116:) 78:( 54:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
postdlf
talk
16:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Green wedding
Green wedding
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Eldamorie
talk
19:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Borock

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.