330:: I think some information about using algorithms to solve nonograms would be useful, but I'm not sure an article dedicated to this one piece of software is the right way to go about it. There was a big discussion in the Telegraph letters pages back in 2003 about using programming as a solving mechanism. I tmay be worth either adding a section to the nonograms article or having a new article
369:
very clear sockpuppet whose only edits have been spamming that site and harassing other editors/vandalizing user pages. He also admits to being a "friend" of the person whose site the article is spam for, which is immediate evidence of meatpuppeting. Assume good faith is for situations that are not clear abuse at work, and everything that editor has ever done is abuse of the system.
368:
There's a significant section there already and is probably already more than it really needs to be. But this isn't the place to discuss what should go on other articles, it's to discuss the very unrepentant spammy article up for deletion. As far as assuming good faith, the person who created it is a
345:
It was already entered into the main nonograms article. And there'saboslutely no justification for a whole new article about computer solving, as it's not any different from how people solve them (that's kind of the point, if the person can;t solve them thn it's no fun to play), and I'm sure our
151:
puzzles with computer. I am gathering and preparing data for my bachelor work. I am not an expert, but yet I have not found this kind of alogrithm anywhere else yet. Yes there is other software that tries to solve this puzzle, but they work a bit differently with different results. Also some are
288:. The shorter search term does produce some relevant extra results, but I can still only find directory entries and a small number of brief mentions on personal sites. Mentions like these are generally considered too trivial to indicate notability. Can you indicate any
301:
I have not searched all the returned links yet (doing this was never my intention in the first place, it just happened, sigh), but all I have found (searched the english only) was directories, blogs or forums. No magazines. Though, I have found
Softpedia report
132:
article as spammer and continuously put back by owner of the website in question. Person who created this article also placed it back in the article against consensus and has no edit history other than doing so, clear sockpuppet of previous spammer,
309:, I think the Griddlers Solver keep up with a lot of them, doesn't it? I do not understand spanish or italian, but there are a lot of articles in these languages. Since the author does not speak any of these languages (according to his CV
346:
little dedicated spammer would just try to convert it into talking about his own software and ignoring all the other computer programs out there doing the same thing (and better, I might add).
292:
that have discussed the program in more detail? For example, if it's been reviewed by a magazine or a website with editorial oversight, that could be used to show notability.
91:
86:
118:
95:
180:
He removes external links in good faith of removing spam, however, in this case he is trying to delete, what might not be a spam. I have been given an approval from
78:
305:, they seem to review software. And directories report amount of download hits, thus the software has some base of its users. Looking at other articles in
256:, only 20 Google hits, seemingly all from freeware directories or mirrors of this article, or from its creator's own site. No evidence of any coverage by
359:
article. I think that this ought to be expanded and reworded at the very least. Also, please assume good faith when referrring to others' edits.
17:
222:. Google hits for "Griddlers Solver with Animator" are merely directory entries, and there are no hits on Google News Archive or
55:
373:
363:
350:
338:
316:
296:
280:
264:
246:
234:
212:
141:
60:
230:
in
Knowledge (XXG) terms; the program needs to have been covered by independent secondary sources, and apparently hasn't been.
197:
puzzles, even those that were mentioned by other people as well. And I believe he is pushing his own personal feeling towards
289:
82:
392:
36:
74:
66:
331:
128:- No notability is even attempted to be established. Page created as spam for a product frequently removed from
391:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
303:
152:
notable for their gains as well and I would want to write about one of them as well, after this is resolved.
227:
137:(not user name's similarity to name of website URL, and he has admitted it's his software he is promoting.
173:
He fails to recognize the importance of attempts to solve nonograms by a computer algorithm. Example:
52:
274:
313:
306:
277:
243:
209:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
159:
is twisting the policies here, pushing his POV and pushing his personal feelings because:
49:
257:
240:
261:
370:
347:
193:
is pushing his own POV, which does not include any kind of algorithm for solving the
190:
174:
156:
138:
360:
335:
293:
231:
208:, though my history is small and it started with writting about Jsimlo's software.
181:
147:
I have created the article, because I feel it is notable to the problem of solving
112:
355:
There is a very small paragraph about nonograms in computer science in the main
205:
198:
163:
134:
223:
356:
276:
gives much more hits than 20, a lot of them even in different languages.
194:
167:
148:
129:
170:
history. My guess is that this is just another step in a longer crusade.
226:. The program may be innovative, but that doesn't count as a claim to
310:
385:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
184:, who apparently thinks this software might be worth of keeping.
166:(the author of the Griddlers Solver with Animator) all over the
108:
104:
100:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
242:? Freeware Guide pages do not list poor software.
395:). No further edits should be made to this page.
312:) they must have been written by other people.
8:
201:, accusing me of being a sock puppet of him.
269:This is not right since searching for
162:He seems to have personal issues with
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
204:I claim to be no sockpuppet of
75:Griddlers Solver with Animator
67:Griddlers Solver with Animator
1:
332:solving nonograms by computer
48:Notability not established.
412:
189:Therefore, I believe that
175:Talk:Nonogram#Links, AGAIN
388:Please do not modify it.
374:18:22, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
364:14:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
351:13:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
339:09:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
317:21:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
297:18:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
281:18:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
265:16:27, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
247:15:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
235:13:08, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
213:12:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
142:23:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
61:02:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
155:I believe that the
271:"Griddlers Solver"
307:Category:Freeware
58:
403:
390:
290:reliable sources
258:reliable sources
239:What about this
116:
98:
56:
34:
411:
410:
406:
405:
404:
402:
401:
400:
399:
393:deletion review
386:
89:
73:
70:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
409:
407:
398:
397:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
342:
341:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
251:
250:
249:
216:
215:
202:
187:
186:
185:
178:
171:
153:
123:
122:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
408:
396:
394:
389:
383:
382:
375:
372:
367:
366:
365:
362:
361:Tim (Xevious)
358:
354:
353:
352:
349:
344:
343:
340:
337:
336:Tim (Xevious)
333:
329:
326:
318:
315:
311:
308:
304:
300:
299:
298:
295:
291:
287:
284:
283:
282:
279:
275:
272:
268:
267:
266:
263:
259:
255:
252:
248:
245:
241:
238:
237:
236:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
217:
214:
211:
207:
203:
200:
196:
192:
191:User:DreamGuy
188:
183:
179:
176:
172:
169:
165:
161:
160:
158:
157:User:DreamGuy
154:
150:
146:
145:
144:
143:
140:
136:
131:
127:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
53:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
387:
384:
334:or similar.
327:
314:Give it back
285:
278:Give it back
270:
253:
244:Give it back
219:
210:Give it back
182:User:Majorly
125:
124:
45:
43:
31:
28:
206:User:Jsimlo
199:User:Jsimlo
164:User:Jsimlo
135:User:Jsimlo
228:notability
224:LexisNexis
50:CĂșchullain
262:The Anome
168:Nonograms
130:nonograms
371:DreamGuy
357:nonogram
348:DreamGuy
195:Nonogram
149:Nonogram
139:DreamGuy
119:View log
328:Comment
294:EALacey
286:Comment
232:EALacey
92:protect
87:history
254:Delete
220:Delete
126:Delete
96:delete
46:Delete
273:only
260:. --
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
302:here
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
117:â (
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
177:.
121:)
115:)
77:(
57:c
54:/
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.