256:) 21:25, 2 December 2013 (UTC): Keep. This is not "conspiracy theory" in any way. That Groundswell exists is not in question--the members named it themselves, and they were clear in their goals and methods as well as in keeping the group secret. The group members included several major players in Washington DC. The article has numerous citations to legitimate sources
371:
This article isn't the best written, and the sources are in a specific time-frame, but I think the amount of media coverage, in combination with the individuals who are a part of the group, make it notable. I know that notability is not inherited, but I think the main reason it got a decent amount
390:
But, as you acknowledge, the group does not receive notability simply from its members. It needs to have some sort of lasting "claim to fame" - as far as I can tell, this is not even a famous group of famous people. To give an example, if a group of celebrities had a party, and there was some
372:
of media coverage at the time was because of its members, and it seems to me a group of notable individuals getting together to shape policy, and that had substantial media coverage when its existence was found out, is notable.
166:
197:
Conspiracy theory. "exposed" ... "conservative cabal" Does not appear to have lasting notability, MSNBC for example does not seem to have any other coverage other than the single article. (By their topics system)
391:
reporting on that party, would the party be notable? No, because the party had no lasting significance. I believe this is a similar situation (with the added problems of casting negative aspersions on people.)
215:
405:
Reliable sources exist that gave it significant coverage in more than one outlet, and shows that it garnered significant media attention. As such, I feel that it meets the criteria for inclusion.
235:
119:
160:
126:
428:. This isn't even close. The organization is covered in detail by multiple reliable sources independent of the subject. Meets both criteria of
92:
87:
96:
79:
17:
181:
148:
316:
396:
324:
261:
253:
223:
203:
460:
40:
142:
441:
414:
400:
381:
359:
328:
310:
293:
265:
242:
227:
207:
61:
138:
257:
249:
410:
377:
83:
188:
456:
355:
289:
239:
57:
36:
306:
174:
340:
274:
154:
437:
406:
373:
75:
67:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
455:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
351:
285:
53:
429:
315:
Did you find any coverage outside of the brief news window cited in the article? See
433:
113:
392:
320:
219:
199:
343:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
277:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
449:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
432:: national scope and verification by multiple third party RSs.
319:. This seems to be a single, isolated piece of sensationalism.
216:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
305:. Multiple independent significant coverage. - Altenmann
109:
105:
101:
173:
350:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
284:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
187:
236:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
463:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
234:Note: This debate has been included in the
214:Note: This debate has been included in the
233:
213:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
442:01:08, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
415:01:34, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
401:00:18, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
382:19:59, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
360:02:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
62:19:13, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
329:18:56, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
311:18:19, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
294:04:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
266:21:25, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
243:13:57, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
228:02:27, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
208:02:26, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
480:
452:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
317:WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE
258:Localemediamonitor
250:Localemediamonitor
48:The result was
362:
296:
245:
230:
76:Groundswell group
68:Groundswell group
471:
454:
349:
345:
283:
279:
240:Northamerica1000
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
479:
478:
474:
473:
472:
470:
469:
468:
467:
461:deletion review
450:
399:
338:
327:
272:
226:
206:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
477:
475:
466:
465:
445:
444:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
395:
385:
384:
365:
364:
363:
347:
346:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
323:
299:
298:
297:
281:
280:
269:
247:
246:
231:
222:
202:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
476:
464:
462:
458:
453:
447:
446:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
424:
423:
416:
412:
408:
404:
403:
402:
398:
394:
389:
388:
387:
386:
383:
379:
375:
370:
367:
366:
361:
357:
353:
348:
344:
342:
337:
336:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
313:
312:
309:
304:
301:
300:
295:
291:
287:
282:
278:
276:
271:
270:
268:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
244:
241:
237:
232:
229:
225:
221:
217:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
451:
448:
425:
407:TonyBallioni
374:TonyBallioni
368:
339:
302:
273:
248:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
352:Mark Arsten
286:Mark Arsten
161:free images
54:Mark Arsten
457:talk page
397:contribs.
325:contribs.
224:contribs.
204:contribs.
37:talk page
459:or in a
341:Relisted
275:Relisted
120:View log
39:or in a
434:BusterD
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
430:WP:NGO
393:OSborn
321:OSborn
220:OSborn
200:OSborn
139:Google
97:delete
307:: -->
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
438:talk
426:Keep
411:talk
378:talk
369:Keep
356:talk
303:keep
290:talk
262:talk
254:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
50:keep
189:TWL
118:– (
440:)
413:)
380:)
358:)
292:)
264:)
238:.
218:.
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
436:(
409:(
376:(
354:(
308:t
288:(
260:(
252:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.