128:
Despite controversies on mailing lists and blogs, Grouply does not appear to be notable. Another editor and myself have both done some searching and nothing turns up from reliable sources (eg Wired magazine has nothing on it). Even
Grouply's supporters don't seem to have been able to find anything.
217:
I see you've added two more blogs. I'm not sure they qualify as RS anywhere, certainly not evidence of notability. What makes TechChrunch more important than Wired? I note that you are the article's creator (and have every right to comment here, but the fact seems relevant)
199:
Contrary to above assertions there are several important citations including TechCrunch, which with startups is more relevant than Wired. Whilst the Alexa stats are not high, it does show more
Grouply has doubled its traffic in the last month.
253:
Grouply seems to be invading Yahoo! groups, and there is a big argument if this is trojan spam or something with which Yahoo! is partnering, as its e-mails claim.--01:52, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
121:
151:. You know an article is in trouble when almost every "source" is actually just the subject's own blog. I also note an Alexa rank of
17:
88:
83:
92:
244:
36:
243:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
75:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
53:
155:, which is really weak especially for social networking (for comparison's sake, Myspace is ranked 7).
223:
205:
134:
187:
227:
209:
191:
174:
138:
79:
57:
152:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
71:
63:
219:
201:
130:
183:
156:
148:
109:
49:
237:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
116:
105:
101:
97:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
247:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
210:00:30, 01 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
228:08:19, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
58:14:09, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
192:16:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
175:13:55, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
139:13:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
267:
240:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
258:
242:
172:
169:
166:
163:
119:
113:
95:
34:
266:
265:
261:
260:
259:
257:
256:
255:
251:
245:deletion review
238:
182:per nominator.
170:
167:
164:
161:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
264:
262:
250:
249:
233:
232:
231:
230:
194:
177:
157:Andrew Lenahan
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
263:
254:
248:
246:
241:
235:
234:
229:
225:
221:
216:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
198:
195:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
176:
173:
158:
154:
150:
146:
143:
142:
141:
140:
136:
132:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
252:
239:
236:
214:
196:
179:
160:
144:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
220:Doug Weller
131:Doug Weller
202:Andyswarbs
184:Thryduulf
153:#49,735th
122:View log
215:Comment
149:WP:CORP
89:protect
84:history
72:Grouply
64:Grouply
180:Delete
145:Delete
117:delete
93:delete
50:Stifle
46:Delete
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
224:talk
206:talk
197:Keep
188:talk
147:per
135:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
168:bli
226:)
208:)
190:)
171:nd
165:ar
162:St
159:-
137:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
222:(
204:(
186:(
133:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.