507:
independent source in the
Chinese Knowledge article that has significant coverage of the person. I am unable to find independent source about the person myself (I searched articles from 2004 in Baidu news), most search engine hits are about his opinion, and his employer and the think tanks he's in do not count as independent sources. Given the person is an opinion leader (quote a lot of news articles cite his opinions), sooner or later an independent sources will write about himself. But the article, as it currently stands, fails the basic notability criteria for biographies. --
384:. Msrasnw has provided enough evidence that the subject is considered a leader in the field of Chinese liberalism. I note that this hasn't yet been flagged for the attention of editors interested in Chinese topics, which may explain the lack of participation here so far by people with a better ability to find sources in Chinese (although Msrasnw has made valiant efforts).
482:. Me too. Professor Gu Su is an important Chinese thinker and one of the leading, university-based, advocates of political reform. His work reflects this very well, as does his extensive connections throughout Chinese society. I realize creating your own pages is against Knowledge's best practice rules, but it's not a vanity page but thoroughly merited.
524:
Citation is what proves notability as a scholar, not sources about their personal life. Scholars , opinion leaders, writers, athletes, musicians, are notable for what they do professionally, and sources that show a person an expert show notability. The only people who are actually notable for their
428:
by nominator: I did not mean to imply the subject was not notable or that anything in the article was incorrect. I was under the impression that this project does not accept articles on a person created by that same person, not least because unless the subject is known well enough for such articles
506:
Citation alone proves nothing about the paper's notability (the citing paper either fail the "significant coverage" test or fails the fair use principle), let lone the author's. Need to find source focusing the person, but it looks like the person himself is unable to find them, there is no
285:
91 citations. This seems a reasonably large amount of notice - notability - given GS poor coverage of
Chinese Scholarship. One can find more of his work on Worldcat and then citations via GS but I am afraid my Mandarin skills are shall we say
269:: Seems to me to be a leading Chinese scholar noted in China for bringing liberal political philosophy to the Chinese audience. I think we might argue there is evidence of notability via his published work. The article suggests that his
282:
158:
226:
433:
editors, they may tend to be very unbalanced, as their creators themselves would seem unlikely to include anything that might cast them in a negative light. After a more thorough look at
274:
119:
152:
402:
437:, I now understand the project’s policy is not that extreme and that the mere creation of an autobiography is not enough to warrant deletion.
489:
356:
over issues of political, constitutional, and legal reform; modes of governance in urban and rural China; and culture and cultural policy
17:
279:
Gu, S. (2003). Zi you zhu yi ji ben li nian =: Essential ideas of liberalism. Beijing: Zhong yang bian yi chu ban she.
173:
140:
555:
92:
87:
40:
493:
96:
413:
389:
79:
551:
442:
234:
214:
36:
134:
525:
personal life are society figures who have done nothing in particular except being written about.
485:
329:
166:
209:, an article may be PRODed only once; I assume this extends to resurrections of deleted articles.
130:
512:
434:
202:
194:
190:
536:
516:
497:
470:
446:
417:
393:
371:
333:
303:
261:
238:
218:
197:
has created an earlier incarnation of this article. I proposed its deletion in
January 2007.
61:
409:
385:
367:
299:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
550:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
180:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
456:
438:
314:
257:
230:
210:
325:
206:
532:
508:
198:
467:
363:
344:
I think the case for keeping the article is strengthened by Su having a chapter in
295:
290:
and I am reliant on the wonders of GTranslate but I think there seems enough for a
250:
146:
53:
113:
281:
is his key work. Google
Scholar lists this I think as 自由主义基本理念 and reports here
253:
83:
459:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
317:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
345:
527:
201:
deleted it in
February 2007, hopefully after careful deliberation.
75:
67:
544:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
227:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
109:
105:
101:
205:
resurrected the article in August 2008. According to
165:
466:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
350:
available to
English-language readers debates among
324:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
558:). No further edits should be made to this page.
275:Worldcat: Essential Ideas of Liberalism Gu, S.
353:prominent Chinese intellectuals and academics
179:
8:
401:Note: This debate has been included in the
225:Note: This debate has been included in the
403:list of China-related deletion discussions
400:
224:
429:to attract significant contributions by
360:Democracy and the Rule of Law in China
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
537:00:45, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
517:21:49, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
447:07:19, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
418:19:38, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
394:19:38, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
372:12:26, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
334:19:43, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
304:22:43, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
271:Essential Ideas of Liberalism
262:16:00, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
239:08:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
219:08:17, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
62:11:41, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
498:12:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
471:06:24, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
575:
547:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
348:(2010) which makes
273:which is listed at
358:(Yu Keping (2010)
48:The result was
488:comment added by
473:
420:
406:
336:
241:
566:
549:
500:
465:
461:
407:
362:Leiden: Brill) (
323:
319:
184:
183:
169:
117:
99:
34:
574:
573:
569:
568:
567:
565:
564:
563:
562:
556:deletion review
545:
490:173.255.225.134
483:
454:
312:
126:
90:
74:
71:
54:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
572:
570:
561:
560:
540:
539:
519:
501:
476:
475:
474:
463:
462:
451:
450:
449:
422:
421:
397:
396:
378:
377:
376:
375:
339:
338:
337:
321:
320:
309:
308:
307:
264:
243:
242:
187:
186:
123:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
571:
559:
557:
553:
548:
542:
541:
538:
534:
530:
529:
523:
520:
518:
514:
510:
505:
502:
499:
495:
491:
487:
481:
478:
477:
472:
469:
464:
460:
458:
453:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
427:
424:
423:
419:
415:
411:
404:
399:
398:
395:
391:
387:
383:
380:
379:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
351:
347:
343:
342:
341:
340:
335:
331:
327:
322:
318:
316:
311:
310:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
265:
263:
259:
255:
252:
248:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
199:User:Lectonar
196:
192:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:Find sources:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
546:
543:
526:
521:
503:
484:— Preceding
479:
455:
430:
425:
410:Phil Bridger
386:Phil Bridger
381:
359:
355:
352:
349:
313:
291:
287:
278:
270:
266:
246:
188:
176:
170:
162:
155:
149:
143:
137:
127:
49:
47:
31:
28:
439:Wikipeditor
435:WP:YOURSELF
283:GS:自由主义基本理念
231:Wikipeditor
211:Wikipeditor
203:User:Gusunj
195:User:Gusunj
191:WP:YOURSELF
153:free images
552:talk page
346:Keping Yu
326:causa sui
189:Possibly
37:talk page
554:or in a
509:Skyfiler
486:unsigned
457:Relisted
315:Relisted
120:View log
39:or in a
504:Comment
468:Spartaz
426:Comment
364:Msrasnw
296:Msrasnw
207:WP:PROD
159:WP refs
147:scholar
93:protect
88:history
254:Jab843
247:Delete
131:Google
97:delete
533:talk
431:other
251:WP:NN
174:JSTOR
135:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
76:Gu Su
68:Gu Su
16:<
522:Keep
513:talk
494:talk
480:Keep
443:talk
414:talk
390:talk
382:Keep
368:talk
330:talk
300:talk
292:keep
288:weak
267:Keep
258:talk
249:per
235:talk
215:talk
167:FENS
141:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
50:keep
528:DGG
294:. (
277:as
181:TWL
118:– (
535:)
515:)
496:)
445:)
416:)
405:.
392:)
370:)
332:)
302:)
260:)
237:)
229:.
217:)
193:–
161:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
531:(
511:(
492:(
441:(
412:(
408:—
388:(
374:)
366:(
328:(
306:)
298:(
256:(
233:(
213:(
185:)
177:·
171:·
163:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
133:(
125:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.