279:. I made and started updating Guerrilla phase of the Second Chechen War (2009) because the war is still going on. Just because a Russian news agency does not call the attackers rebels does not mean this article should be deleted. These incidents aren't just some scattered landmines and a few people acting alone, this is an organization of fighters through out the Caucus or Russia fighting the Russian military and their allies. In 2008 the Russian military put 3,500 more troops in Ingushetia and over 4,000 more in the surrounding areas, these troop surges along with the continued and intensifying rebel attacks prove that this war is still going on. If it was over or near over Russia would either pull out or significantly draw down its forces not send more in. Through out the history of the Guerrilla Phase of the Second Chechen war the contributors of Knowledge (XXG) have added attacks from Dagestan, Ingushetia, Karabnio-Balkaria, and North Ossetia. None of these places are Chechnya. Yet we still list them under the Second Chechen war, it only makes sense. The other thing is I am doing my best with the help of others to only add significant attacks so the Guerrilla section does not get all jumbled and huge like the 2008 section. If you are looking at Guerrilla phase 2009 as WP:SYNTH then you would also agree with deleting Guerrilla phases 2005 through 2008. I ask you not to delete 2009 Guerrilla Phase but to help me make it and all other articles related to the Chechen war better thank you.
350:
rebels. I also changed the
Localized Sporadic Fighting to Low Level Insurgency because I thought that was a more accurate title and everyone seems to be fine with it. I'm not sure if you brought up the whole edit thing to make me look bad, but it had nothing to do with the topic were on Guerrilla Phase 2009. Now when it comes to my sources for the Guerrilla Phase 2009 I used a mix so i couldn't be accused of any bias and I kept the information accurate to a t. I don't think anyone understands what you mean when you are saying this has nothing to do with the 2nd Chechen war. It's not like these are made up stories or something and I know a news agency does not have to say 2nd Chechen war or Insurgency for it to be one. I also like how you (Lokki) seem to think you are the only one that's right on this issue. You say one sentence about the Discussion of Guerrilla Phase 2009 and then go on a long diatribe about me and some edits classy Lokki! Next time you accuse me of doing something wrong bring a better argument! Im trying to make a good article, I dont know why your fighting me on that.
221:
etc.. but nothing about warfare. The word "guerrilla" is nowhere to be found in any of those articles, neither is there any mention of a new "phase" of a war that ended years ago. And like I said, the bombing and all those listed attacks didn't even take place in
Chechnya. You're grasping at straws
349:
Lokki! I made a mistake on a couple of edits which was my fault but they were by no means errouneas. I also did add that estimations for
Russian casualty's ran as high has 20,000 which is a fact by numerous organizations. I only put that because the article also had estimations for the Chechen
187:
Four
Russian policemen and three suspected rebels were killed on Thursday when a residential building exploded during a police raid in the southern region of Ingushetia, officials said. The two-storey building in Nazran, around 1,500 km (930 miles) south of Moscow, was reduced to rubble by an
314:
article a different user ended up having to revert a whole chain of your edits because you were adding erroneous information that wasn't supported by sources there too. You're evidently new here, so I won't assume bad faith on your part. It's a common mistake. You should head over to
131:. Fabricated war. None of these sources mention a "Guerrilla phase" of the Second Chechen war (which is over), or anything about Guerrilla warfare. Moreover, none of this violence is occurring in Chechnya as the title would suggest, and it's completely sporadic and unorganized.
87:
82:
91:
74:
120:
78:
217:- That's simply not true. None of those articles mention warfare currently taking place in Chechnya (or any other region). Not a single one. They all say the same thing:
70:
62:
222:
and trying to blow it way out of proportion based on your own personal interpretation of what warfare and
Guerrilla warfare are. That falls under the category of
370:
340:
299:
267:
235:
205:
158:
140:
56:
17:
188:
explosion as special forces officers forced entry to detain a group of suspected rebels, a police officer at the scene told
Reuters.
328:
386:
36:
366:
295:
385:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
354:
283:
316:
201:
258:
to be in control of his fief, the neighboring regimes crumble - but it's their problem, not Ramzan's.
320:
197:
311:
251:
154:
223:
128:
193:
175:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
324:
310:
Unfortunately, none of the sources you supplied support any of your claims. I noticed in the
336:
247:
231:
136:
215:
No, in fact every cited source (and a lot of other sources) describes warfare in
Chechnya."
362:
291:
263:
150:
50:
108:
332:
227:
132:
358:
287:
254:. Chechnya is just a piece of a larger (and scarier) picture; while Ramzan
259:
179:
171:
149:. Agreed, this is not a "Guerilla phase of the Second Chechen war."
379:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
115:
104:
100:
96:
219:
Violent region/volatile region/violence plagued region
170:
cited source (and a lot of other sources) describes
174:in Chechnya. This can be either an active war or a
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
389:). No further edits should be made to this page.
71:Guerrilla phase of the Second Chechen War (2009)
63:Guerrilla phase of the Second Chechen War (2009)
185:
319:and read up on all the policies, specifically
8:
250:belongs to Chechnya, less so to a long-gone
192:And so on, and so on... If this is not a
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
226:, just like the article itself.
1:
371:00:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
341:16:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
300:23:10, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
268:19:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
236:18:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
206:15:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
159:05:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
141:01:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
406:
182:(a ref from this article):
57:03:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
382:Please do not modify it.
317:Knowledge (XXG) policies
32:Please do not modify it.
190:
329:WP:Original Research
178:. Let me just cite
312:Second Chechen War
252:Second Chechen war
44:The result was
374:
357:comment added by
303:
286:comment added by
194:Guerrilla warfare
176:Guerrilla warfare
397:
384:
373:
351:
302:
280:
248:guerilla warfare
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
405:
404:
400:
399:
398:
396:
395:
394:
393:
387:deletion review
380:
352:
281:
189:
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
403:
401:
392:
391:
348:
346:
345:
344:
343:
305:
304:
273:
272:
271:
270:
246:Easy: Not all
241:
240:
239:
238:
196:, what is it?
186:
184:
183:
166:. No, in fact
161:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
402:
390:
388:
383:
377:
376:
375:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
313:
309:
308:
307:
306:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
278:
275:
274:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
244:
243:
242:
237:
233:
229:
225:
220:
216:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
195:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
160:
156:
152:
148:
145:
144:
143:
142:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
381:
378:
347:
276:
255:
218:
214:
191:
167:
163:
146:
126:
49:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
353:—Preceding
282:—Preceding
321:WP:Sources
367:contribs
355:unsigned
296:contribs
284:unsigned
224:WP:SYNTH
151:Offliner
129:WP:SYNTH
121:View log
325:WP:SOAP
256:appears
198:Biophys
180:Reuters
172:warfare
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
333:LokiiT
228:LokiiT
147:Delete
133:LokiiT
116:delete
92:delete
168:every
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
363:talk
359:Cmp7
337:talk
327:and
292:talk
288:Cmp7
277:Keep
264:talk
232:talk
202:talk
164:Keep
155:talk
137:talk
127:Per
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
260:NVO
369:)
365:•
339:)
331:.
323:,
298:)
294:•
266:)
234:)
204:)
157:)
139:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
361:(
335:(
290:(
262:(
230:(
213:"
200:(
153:(
135:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.