375:, did a copy & paste move from Draft space to article space. There is no reason to think that after moving it back to draft space it would stay there, nor that after 5 declines it will prosper there, although it could if the creator and associates were willing. I fear it must be made into an acceptable article during this AfD, or else deleted.
687:
for promotion. For example, the current article states "In 2012, DNS Made Easy made history...DNS Made Easy's network was unaffected by the attack with no effects to end users" but the cited source was dated 2010 and says otherwise. The second paragraph in the lead claims that the company "is the
492:
Strictly speaking, the MfD didn't delete this or any version of it. It looked like it was heading to a delete outcome, but still had lots of time to run, when it was interrupted by the HistMerge, and made moot by the opening of this AfD. It is possible (but unlikely) that further eedits could have
528:
Because draft was declined so many times even after taking appropriate action and removal external links then that still be nominated for deletion. Not all resources seem to be press release. Please revert it for deletion and improve it yourself instead deleting it.
678:
due to the number of times a promotional article about this company has been drafted, submitted, moved, merged, created and otherwise wasted time of
Wikipedians who might otherwise be building an encyclopedia. I was unable to find reliable sources to support
335:. I don't know why this ended up in article space, but it shouldn't be there. It might eventually be accepted through AfC if the blatant advertising, blatant paid editing and questionable notability are dealt with. Deletion was proposed
564:
166:
655:- when a dupe of this came up at AfC, I declined it there due to notability. Searches turned up nothing but (as Primefac and Cullen328 point out), mentions and press releases. No in-depth, independent coverage.
247:
looks to be reliable, but the key content is behind a paywall. I think this needs more checking before a decision is made. If it is kept it must be edited to remove promotional content and puffery, of course.
392:
263:
I did check all of those sources, and I did not feel that those sources demonstrated enough detail to demonstrate notability. Obviously if consensus is that I was overly critical, then I'll roll with it.
634:
I searched for significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, but found only passing mentions, press releases and the usual social media stuff controlled by the company. Not notable.
726:
claims is the number one provider in market shares? There are so many little things on wikipedia and i see people never be interested to read/edit/improve on them but still existing. lol
336:
119:
476:
salt, and not move to draft space. Having it there did not produce any improvement in the past, and there's no reason to expect any in the future. The MfD already deleted it there.
282:
search, I mean did you do a net search of your own for other sources, not provided by the article drafter, to see if any of them demonstrated or helped to demonstrate notability?
446:
419:
160:
692:
don't. Search for "dns service market share" or similar. I found no other source to support the company as number one. The company isn't notable. Articles about
461:
434:
407:
126:
450:
423:
396:
239:
236:
17:
92:
87:
696:
should be blocked for a while to minimize time wasted, recognizing that it may become notable enough for an article in the future.
96:
722:
says "making it the world's largest ICANN-accredited registrar." doesn't this look like a promotional or advertisement? What if
359:
242:
79:
551:
181:
705:
613:
587:
148:
757:
40:
355:
544:
142:
601:
684:
739:
718:
It's funny all of you claim wasted time of wikipedians and still be wasting your time in this discussion.
712:
666:
647:
620:
593:
556:
538:
523:
499:
487:
465:
438:
411:
381:
363:
317:
302:
288:
273:
254:
214:
138:
61:
510:
202:
753:
730:
you're a racist man.. Well close this topic, delete article do whatever you want and stop being biased.
83:
36:
521:
245:
188:
57:
543:
Onus is on those seeking to retain the content to seek sources, not on those seeking to remove it. —
198:
723:
693:
640:
174:
75:
67:
279:
228:
497:
379:
315:
298:
286:
269:
252:
210:
575:
pushback and didn't want to push the limits of G6. I'm hoping for a "snow" close on the MfD.
735:
701:
609:
583:
534:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
752:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
675:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
709:
617:
568:
154:
518:
348:
53:
635:
344:
680:
224:
656:
514:
494:
483:
376:
372:
312:
308:
294:
283:
265:
249:
232:
206:
201:
sources (mainly press releases) and name drops. No indication of notability, and the
731:
727:
697:
605:
576:
530:
688:
number one provider in market shares" and the cited source supports the claim but
113:
689:
683:. Cited sources often either don't support the promotional content or were
565:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Draft:DNS Made Easy (2nd nomination)
478:
340:
241:
is a reliable source, and does not seem to be based on a press release.
719:
238:
is a reliable source, although the mention of the subject is brief.
746:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
244:
may be reliable, I'm not sure of the credentials of the author.
235:
or if you have, you don't mention it above. As to the sources,
293:
Ah. Yes, I did do a search, and found more PR and name-drops.
393:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
223:
While I don't think the article as it stands establishes
371:
This ended up in article space because someone, i think
509:: To add to the confusion, a new account has recreated
109:
105:
101:
173:
231:
check, and it doesn't sound aas if you have either,
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
760:). No further edits should be made to this page.
600:Another earlier version of the draft exists at
563:I have nominated the draft for deletion, see
447:list of Business-related deletion discussions
420:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
205:was repeatedly declined for similar reasons.
8:
445:Note: This debate has been included in the
418:Note: This debate has been included in the
391:Note: This debate has been included in the
444:
417:
390:
197:Promotional article supported entirely by
513:on 16 September. I left a message on
351:, and seems a reasonable alternative.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
278:Thank you. When I ask if you did a
24:
740:08:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
713:20:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
667:13:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
648:04:01, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
621:15:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
594:05:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
557:21:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
539:21:26, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
524:13:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
500:22:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
493:reverse the trend at the MfD.
488:17:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
466:09:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
439:09:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
412:09:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
382:12:07, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
364:08:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
318:22:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
307:Thnak you for clarifing that,
303:03:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
289:02:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
274:02:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
255:02:39, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
215:01:40, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
62:16:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
1:
457:Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR
430:Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR
403:Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR
777:
749:Please do not modify it.
571:but I expected at least
227:, I haven't done a full
32:Please do not modify it.
602:User:ZippyCycle/sandbox
356:Justlettersandnumbers
517:in this regards. --
511:Draft:DNS Made Easy
333:Move to draft space
592:
591:
468:
441:
414:
343:and supported by
768:
751:
663:
660:
645:
643:Let's discuss it
581:
580:
567:. I considered
554:
549:
458:
455:
431:
428:
404:
401:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
776:
775:
771:
770:
769:
767:
766:
765:
764:
758:deletion review
747:
661:
658:
641:
552:
545:
515:DGG's talk page
456:
451:
429:
424:
402:
397:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
774:
772:
763:
762:
716:
715:
669:
650:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
561:
560:
559:
504:
503:
502:
470:
469:
442:
415:
387:
386:
385:
384:
353:
352:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
258:
257:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
773:
761:
759:
755:
750:
744:
743:
742:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
724:DNS Made Easy
721:
714:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
694:DNS Made Easy
691:
690:other sources
686:
685:cherry picked
682:
677:
673:
670:
668:
665:
664:
654:
651:
649:
646:
644:
639:
638:
633:
630:
622:
619:
615:
611:
607:
603:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
589:
585:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
555:
550:
548:
542:
541:
540:
536:
532:
527:
526:
525:
522:
520:
516:
512:
508:
505:
501:
498:
496:
491:
490:
489:
485:
481:
480:
475:
472:
471:
467:
463:
459:
454:
448:
443:
440:
436:
432:
427:
421:
416:
413:
409:
405:
400:
394:
389:
388:
383:
380:
378:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
330:
319:
316:
314:
310:
306:
305:
304:
300:
296:
292:
291:
290:
287:
285:
281:
277:
276:
275:
271:
267:
262:
261:
260:
259:
256:
253:
251:
246:
243:
240:
237:
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
203:draft version
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:DNS Made Easy
73:
72:
69:
68:DNS Made Easy
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
748:
745:
717:
671:
657:
652:
642:
636:
631:
572:
546:
506:
477:
473:
452:
425:
398:
354:
332:
220:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
161:free images
681:notability
519:Sam Sailor
349:Sam Sailor
225:notability
54:Randykitty
754:talk page
604:as well.
569:WP:CSD#G6
345:SmokeyJoe
280:WP:BEFORE
229:WP:BEFORE
37:talk page
756:or in a
588:contribs
573:a little
474:Delete,
373:Wikimoze
309:Primefac
295:Primefac
266:Primefac
233:Primefac
207:Primefac
120:View log
39:or in a
732:Xandios
728:Doctree
720:Godaddy
698:DocTree
606:DocTree
577:davidwr
531:Xandios
507:Comment
221:Comment
199:PRIMARY
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
672:Delete
653:Delete
637:Cullen
632:Delete
547:Jeremy
453:1Wiki8
426:1Wiki8
399:1Wiki8
139:Google
97:delete
50:delete
553:v^_^v
484:talk
449:. --
422:. --
395:. --
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
736:talk
706:ʇuoɔ
702:ʞlɐʇ
676:salt
674:and
662:5969
659:Onel
614:ʇuoɔ
610:ʞlɐʇ
584:talk
535:talk
462:talk
435:talk
408:talk
360:talk
347:and
337:here
299:talk
270:talk
211:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
710:WER
618:WER
586:)/(
495:DES
479:DGG
377:DES
341:DGG
339:by
313:DES
284:DES
250:DES
189:TWL
118:– (
52:.
738:)
708:)
616:)
537:)
486:)
464:)
437:)
410:)
362:)
311:.
301:)
272:)
213:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
734:(
704:·
700:(
612:·
608:(
590:)
582:(
579:/
533:(
482:(
460:(
433:(
406:(
358:(
297:(
268:(
209:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.