350:
are not intellectually independent enough, then I can see your point. Just looking for clarification on the principles because when I submitted this article I believed that we met WP:NCORP because I cited multiple independent sources and that is the only requirement I see in WP:NCORP. I see no definition nor requirement of "intellectual independence" nor "depth" in WP:NCORP, so I do not think it is fair to assess that these sources "clearly fail the independence criteria".
219:
activities of The DotComGuy (person) and the subsequent branding of the DotComGuy company, going back (as of 1/9/2018) 18 years, providing it with a basis for notability both as a documentation of the history of the evolution of the DotComGuy brand (first as a person, then as a company that purchased the brand) and as a company in its own right.
261:. We normally require multiple reliable sources intellectually independent from the company that discuss the company in some depth. Both sources present in the article clearly fail the independence criterion. Unless better sources can be found, the article is likely to be deleted. Also, please be mindful of our
349:
because there are multiple reliable sources that are independent from the company. I do see your point about depth, however I believe at around 750 words the Sun
Current article does offer some depth, though if your point is that any articles that involve interviewing a representative of the company
218:
I believe this article meets the criteria for inclusion on the basis of its reliably referenced content and notability. There are two citations from reputable news sources about this company and its activities and the article is written in a neutral way. Additionally, its history evolves out of the
224:
With regards to the assertion that there is a lack of substantial third-party coverage, I would challenge where the line should be drawn to define whether third-party coverage is substantial or not - what is the established criteria for defining what is and is not substantial? If evidence can be
225:
presented as to what the established norm within the
Knowledge (XXG) community is to define substantial, then I agree that this is or is not substantial in accordance with whatever that established norm is, however I have been unable to find any documentation of what constitutes substantial.
344:
What aspect makes the existing sources not independent? These organizations are both independent news organizations. Is it because they are interviewing DotComGuy representatives? I believe this does meet the cited criteria in
163:
213:
I apologize if I posted my feedback on the wrong page. I thought I had to add it to the article's talk page - I didn't realize there was another talk page specifically for the discussion of deletion.
116:
157:
325:
283:
297:
311:
123:
89:
84:
93:
76:
365:
240:
178:
17:
145:
198:
by a wide margin due to lack of substantial third-party coverage. Not to be confused with the person having the same name.
471:
412:
139:
541:
40:
449:-- the company has not achieved anything significant just yet. Sources listed in the article are local, not meeting
135:
522:
505:
486:
462:
427:
399:
369:
331:
317:
303:
289:
274:
244:
207:
58:
258:
185:
80:
501:
353:
228:
361:
236:
442:
382:
Interviews do not normally contribute to the notability of a company since they are primary sources. See
72:
64:
537:
482:
458:
423:
257:. The DotComGuy person is covered in another article and does not confer notability on your company per
54:
36:
151:
446:
171:
383:
497:
438:
346:
254:
195:
395:
377:
357:
270:
250:
232:
203:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
536:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
518:
454:
450:
262:
388:
other works in which the company, corporation, organization, or group talks about itself
496:. I don't see the significant third party coverage needed to be regarded as notable.
391:
341:
266:
199:
110:
514:
513:- we need significant coverage in independent reliable sources.--
530:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
474:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
415:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
253:, the notability criteria for companies are laid out at
106:
102:
98:
170:
480:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
421:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
184:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
544:). No further edits should be made to this page.
324:Note: This discussion has been included in the
310:Note: This discussion has been included in the
296:Note: This discussion has been included in the
282:Note: This discussion has been included in the
326:list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions
284:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
298:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
351:
323:
312:list of Texas-related deletion discussions
309:
295:
281:
226:
194:De-prodded by the author. Appears to fail
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
263:conflict of interest guideline
1:
52:. Consensus is for deletion.
523:07:15, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
506:17:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
487:12:34, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
463:19:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
428:12:40, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
400:00:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
386:, which explicitly excludes
370:05:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
332:04:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
318:04:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
304:04:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
290:04:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
275:04:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
245:03:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
208:02:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
59:13:29, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
561:
533:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
73:DotComGuy (company)
65:DotComGuy (company)
489:
437:-- does not meet
430:
372:
356:comment added by
334:
320:
306:
292:
247:
231:comment added by
552:
535:
485:
479:
477:
475:
426:
420:
418:
416:
381:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
57:
34:
560:
559:
555:
554:
553:
551:
550:
549:
548:
542:deletion review
531:
490:
481:
470:
468:
445:and in general
431:
422:
411:
409:
375:
259:WP:NOTINHERITED
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
558:
556:
547:
546:
526:
525:
508:
478:
467:
466:
465:
419:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
336:
335:
321:
307:
293:
279:
278:
277:
265:. Thank you.
221:
220:
215:
214:
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
557:
545:
543:
539:
534:
528:
527:
524:
520:
516:
512:
509:
507:
503:
499:
498:Slideshow Bob
495:
492:
491:
488:
484:
483:North America
476:
473:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
432:
429:
425:
424:North America
417:
414:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
379:
374:
373:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
348:
343:
340:
339:
338:
337:
333:
330:
327:
322:
319:
316:
313:
308:
305:
302:
299:
294:
291:
288:
285:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
249:
248:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
223:
222:
217:
216:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
56:
55:North America
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
532:
529:
510:
493:
469:
443:WP:CORPDEPTH
434:
410:
387:
378:Jacobbeasley
358:Jacobbeasley
352:— Preceding
329:
315:
301:
287:
251:Jacobbeasley
233:Jacobbeasley
227:— Preceding
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
49:
47:
31:
28:
455:K.e.coffman
158:free images
447:WP:TOOSOON
538:talk page
384:WP:ORGIND
37:talk page
540:or in a
472:Relisted
439:WP:NCORP
413:Relisted
366:contribs
354:unsigned
347:WP:NCORP
255:WP:NCORP
241:contribs
229:unsigned
196:WP:NCORP
117:View log
39:or in a
392:Rentier
342:Rentier
267:Rentier
200:Rentier
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
515:Rusf10
511:Delete
494:Delete
451:WP:AUD
435:Delete
136:Google
94:delete
50:delete
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
519:talk
502:talk
459:talk
396:talk
362:talk
271:talk
237:talk
204:talk
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
186:TWL
115:– (
521:)
504:)
461:)
453:.
441:/
398:)
390:.
368:)
364:•
328:.
314:.
300:.
286:.
273:)
243:)
239:•
206:)
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
517:(
500:(
457:(
394:(
380::
376:@
360:(
269:(
235:(
202:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.