403:
The references currently in the article are rubbish (his amazon.com reviewers profile (!), an autobiography at jGuru.com, a masters thesis that doesn't mention him, and an interview in a niche magazine about development of one game) and none offer significant coverage of the topic, so he clearly
410:
There are five books and four notable video games where he played a significant role, so he is somewhat significant. I don't at all see "obvious" notability, like Lulu thinks, lots of people write books, lots of people have significant roles in video games.
415:#3 isn't enough, in my opinion: *every* video game released these days gets coverage (previews, tests) in multiple sources – that makes the product notable, but not the authors, and I can't believe it was intended that way.
184:
84:
79:
222:
lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. If you actually drill down on some of the cites provided you will find passing mention or no mention of this person within.
359:. Even apart from the obvious notability, substantial publication, surviving prior AfDs, etc., the bad-faith nomination was made solely as wikistalking because I had worked on the article.
139:
273:
178:
144:
246:
417:
Based on that, I would favor deletion, and seeing that there is no significant coverage of the topic at all and we'd be relying only on the indicators from
74:
250:
366:
17:
431:
390:
371:
351:
329:
310:
288:
262:
235:
57:
360:
112:
107:
305:
283:
199:
116:
446:
36:
166:
99:
379:
If he is the lead developed for the game, he is notable, and I think the references are good enough to show it.
445:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
317:
302:
280:
160:
347:
156:
103:
229:
192:
412:
298:
426:
206:
325:
258:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
343:
53:
418:
219:
223:
172:
405:
386:
321:
254:
133:
49:
95:
63:
381:
338:- doesn't he pass #3 of WP:AUTHOR? i.e. lead programmer of the seminal
439:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
408:. Most of the information has to be thrown out if this is kept.
401:
would be notable, which I hadn't considered thus far. :)
129:
125:
121:
191:
205:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
449:). No further edits should be made to this page.
85:Articles for deletion/Doug Bell (3rd nomination)
80:Articles for deletion/Doug Bell (2nd nomination)
247:list of video game related deletion discussions
8:
316:This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing
274:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
268:
421:, I quite firmly believe this should be
272:: This debate has been included in the
245:: This debate has been included in the
72:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
70:
24:
75:Articles for deletion/Doug Bell
1:
395:Based on similar reasoning
466:
432:16:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
391:08:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
372:17:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
58:15:36, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
352:17:24, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
330:16:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
311:17:34, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
289:17:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
263:00:19, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
251:Search video game sources
236:17:47, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
442:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
69:AfDs for this article:
320:). It is listed now.
218:. This individual
44:The result was
332:
308:
291:
286:
277:
265:
457:
444:
429:
369:
363:
315:
306:
297:. Does not pass
284:
278:
241:
232:
226:
210:
209:
195:
147:
137:
119:
34:
465:
464:
460:
459:
458:
456:
455:
454:
453:
447:deletion review
440:
427:
367:
361:
230:
224:
152:
143:
110:
94:
91:
89:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
463:
461:
452:
451:
435:
434:
416:
409:
402:
393:
374:
354:
340:Dungeon Master
333:
313:
292:
266:
213:
212:
149:
145:AfD statistics
90:
88:
87:
82:
77:
71:
68:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
462:
450:
448:
443:
437:
436:
433:
430:
424:
420:
414:
407:
400:
399:
394:
392:
388:
384:
383:
378:
375:
373:
370:
364:
358:
355:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
331:
327:
323:
319:
314:
312:
309:
304:
300:
296:
293:
290:
287:
282:
275:
271:
267:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
239:
238:
237:
233:
227:
221:
217:
208:
204:
201:
198:
194:
190:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
158:
155:
154:Find sources:
150:
146:
141:
135:
131:
127:
123:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
92:
86:
83:
81:
78:
76:
73:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
441:
438:
422:
397:
396:
380:
376:
356:
339:
335:
301:in my view.
294:
269:
242:
215:
214:
202:
196:
188:
181:
175:
169:
163:
153:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
357:Speedy keep
344:Marasmusine
179:free images
413:WP:AUTHOR
299:WP:AUTHOR
225:JBsupreme
96:Doug Bell
64:Doug Bell
428:Amalthea
140:View log
423:deleted
322:DumbBOT
255:MrKIA11
185:WP refs
173:scholar
113:protect
108:history
419:WP:BIO
404:fails
318:step 3
295:Delete
220:WP:BLP
216:Delete
157:Google
117:delete
50:Stifle
387:talk
362:LotLE
200:JSTOR
161:books
134:views
126:watch
122:links
16:<
406:WP:N
377:Keep
368:talk
348:talk
336:Keep
326:talk
307:ping
303:Pcap
285:ping
281:Pcap
270:Note
259:talk
243:Note
231:talk
193:FENS
167:news
130:logs
104:talk
100:edit
54:talk
382:DGG
279:--
249:. (
207:TWL
142:•
138:– (
425:.
389:)
350:)
342:?
328:)
276:.
261:)
253:)
234:)
187:)
132:|
128:|
124:|
120:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
56:)
48:.
398:I
385:(
365:×
346:(
324:(
257:(
228:(
211:)
203:·
197:·
189:·
182:·
176:·
170:·
164:·
159:(
151:(
148:)
136:)
98:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.