303:- Seems to fail the general notability guideline. Both the sources cited in the article and the ghits I found are either websites he is affiliated with or non-RS blogs commenting on his departure from Saddleback. Some of his books are published by religious publishing houses that might be independent of Saddleback, but blurbs on book jacket are not significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. --
31:
272:, arguably the most famous church in the world. Those alone should meet Wiki criteria, let alone the fact that he is a nationally-recognized speaker. Just because you haven't heard of him doesn't mean he isn't notable. In his field, he is probably the most famous
320:
Largely per flavius, but I found quite a number of his books. A sales rank of 15,000 at Amazon isn't exactly a best seller, but neither is it indicative of self-published status. I added a few books to the article, and cleaned up some
189:
284:. Had the user above taken 2 minutes to Google the guy, we wouldn't even be wasting our time on this. Notability is clearly established. I move to have this frivolous and baseless appeal dropped immediately.
150:
183:
40:
280:
because I don't know anything about that field - that doesn't mean they aren't notable. I've added several sources and the guy has a profile on
17:
390:
264:
This one isn't even debatable. Try
Googling the guy. He has written more than 50 published books and worked for nearly 20 years as
123:
118:
127:
289:
204:
171:
110:
372:
65:
46:
371:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
285:
85:
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
165:
354:
161:
357:
334:
312:
293:
254:
237:
92:
114:
328:
211:
197:
78:
106:
98:
348:
342:
Publishing lots of books does not guarantee notability. No other reliable sources supporting
277:
269:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
308:
343:
221:
323:
246:
Looked for reliable sources to establish notability. Could not establish he is notable.
233:
225:
177:
276:
expert in the world. For instance, I have never heard of any of the leading experts on
273:
384:
144:
304:
265:
248:
281:
229:
220:
No evidence this person or any of his projects are even remotely
365:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
25:
140:
136:
132:
196:
210:
68:). No further edits should be made to this page.
375:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
45:For an explanation of the process, see
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
41:deletion review on 2009 November 4
24:
224:. Completely lacks citations to
29:
47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
1:
358:15:39, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
335:00:03, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
313:04:12, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
294:04:07, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
255:00:48, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
238:23:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
93:00:38, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
407:
391:Pages at deletion review
368:Please do not modify it.
61:Please do not modify it.
286:Flavius Constantine
226:third-party sources
73:The result was
278:quantum mechanics
270:Saddleback Church
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
398:
370:
352:
333:
331:
326:
268:'s associate at
251:
215:
214:
200:
148:
130:
88:
63:
33:
32:
26:
406:
405:
401:
400:
399:
397:
396:
395:
381:
380:
379:
373:deletion review
366:
350:
329:
324:
322:
249:
157:
121:
105:
102:
86:
66:deletion review
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
404:
402:
394:
393:
383:
382:
378:
377:
361:
360:
337:
315:
297:
296:
274:youth ministry
258:
257:
218:
217:
154:
101:
96:
71:
70:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
403:
392:
389:
388:
386:
376:
374:
369:
363:
362:
359:
356:
355:
353:
345:
341:
338:
336:
332:
327:
319:
316:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
298:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
260:
259:
256:
253:
252:
245:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
213:
209:
206:
203:
199:
195:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
163:
160:
159:Find sources:
155:
152:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
125:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
103:
100:
97:
95:
94:
91:
89:
82:
81:
76:
69:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
367:
364:
347:
339:
317:
300:
261:
250:~~ GB fan ~~
247:
243:
219:
207:
201:
193:
186:
180:
174:
168:
158:
83:
79:
74:
72:
60:
57:
36:
321:citations--
266:Rick Warren
184:free images
107:Doug Fields
99:Doug Fields
325:SPhilbrick
282:Amazon.com
385:Category
351:itsJamie
151:View log
346:claim.
222:notable
190:WP refs
178:scholar
124:protect
119:history
344:WP:BIO
340:Delete
305:Orlady
301:Delete
244:Delete
162:Google
128:delete
75:delete
262:Leave
230:EEMIV
205:JSTOR
166:books
145:views
137:watch
133:links
16:<
349:OhNo
318:Keep
309:talk
290:talk
234:talk
228:. --
198:FENS
172:news
141:logs
115:talk
111:edit
87:Talk
212:TWL
149:– (
387::
311:)
292:)
236:)
192:)
143:|
139:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
80:NW
77:.
43:.
330:T
307:(
288:(
232:(
216:)
208:·
202:·
194:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
164:(
156:(
153:)
147:)
109:(
90:)
84:(
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.